Drift of Phantasms
Played in 35,226 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
30
Commanders
30All commanders (30)
- Arcades, the Strategist relevance 4.20 · 35.8% (3,778 of 10,561 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 4.14 · 43.5% (5,825 of 13,380 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 4.09 · 53.9% (1,513 of 2,805 decks)
- Phenax, God of Deception relevance 3.37 · 12.0% (556 of 4,634 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 2.85 · 17.8% (128 of 720 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 2.52 · 48.8% (80 of 164 decks)
- Super-Skrull relevance 2.50 · 3.5% (58 of 1,658 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 2.39 · 21.8% (32 of 147 decks)
- Kefka, Court Mage // Kefka, Ruler of Ruin relevance 2.37 · 3.5% (730 of 20,862 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 2.35 · 29.4% (303 of 1,030 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 2.34 · 23.3% (28 of 120 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 2.31 · 14.9% (525 of 3,528 decks)
- Vivi Ornitier relevance 2.27 · 10.5% (2,796 of 26,609 decks)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.08 · 6.4% (378 of 5,866 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 2.04 · 21.9% (111 of 507 decks)
- Loot, the Pathfinder relevance 2.03 · 6.3% (149 of 2,367 decks)
- Toluz, Clever Conductor relevance 1.96 · 5.1% (49 of 959 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 1.95 · 5.7% (81 of 1,411 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.94 · 20.3% (257 of 1,263 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 1.80 · 11.5% (30 of 261 decks)
- Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 1.70 · 19.5% (85 of 437 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Breeches, Brazen Plunderer relevance 1.67 · 11.8% (241 of 2,036 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Ravos, Soultender relevance 1.67 · 6.3% (17 of 270 decks)
- Shiko, Paragon of the Way relevance 1.66 · 4.2% (68 of 1,628 decks)
- Kasla, the Broken Halo relevance 1.64 · 3.8% (79 of 2,095 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 1.64 · 6.0% (37 of 621 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // K-9, Mark I relevance 1.63 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 1.63 · 28.1% (38 of 135 decks)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 1.61 · 3.6% (83 of 2,314 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 1.61 · 3.8% (72 of 1,908 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 1.55 · 39.0% (13,729 of 35,226 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 1.32 · 22.6% (7,967 of 35,226 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 1.05 · 20.6% (7,274 of 35,226 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 1.05 · 40.1% (14,134 of 35,226 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.99 · 23.1% (8,147 of 35,226 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.98 · 29.4% (10,342 of 35,226 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.94 · 28.4% (9,991 of 35,226 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.94 · 27.1% (9,542 of 35,226 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.92 · 25.2% (8,861 of 35,226 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.92 · 44.4% (15,634 of 35,226 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.90 · 38.0% (13,397 of 35,226 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.90 · 24.6% (8,676 of 35,226 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.90 · 29.1% (10,245 of 35,226 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.88 · 19.0% (6,707 of 35,226 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (6,874 of 35,226 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.86 · 32.3% (11,385 of 35,226 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.85 · 22.6% (7,954 of 35,226 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.85 · 15.4% (5,410 of 35,226 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.84 · 25.9% (9,123 of 35,226 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.84 · 36.3% (12,792 of 35,226 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.82 · 21.6% (7,610 of 35,226 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.81 · 15.6% (5,500 of 35,226 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.81 · 32.0% (11,260 of 35,226 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.79 · 19.8% (6,967 of 35,226 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.77 · 26.2% (9,245 of 35,226 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.77 · 24.9% (8,781 of 35,226 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.77 · 20.5% (7,217 of 35,226 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.75 · 15.1% (5,334 of 35,226 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.74 · 25.5% (8,968 of 35,226 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.72 · 43.5% (15,320 of 35,226 decks)
Creatures
6
Creatures
6 All creatures (6)
- Trophy Mage relevance 1.05 · 20.6% (7,274 of 35,226 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.94 · 28.4% (9,991 of 35,226 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.85 · 15.4% (5,410 of 35,226 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.75 · 15.1% (5,334 of 35,226 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.67 · 20.6% (7,256 of 35,226 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.67 · 16.6% (5,830 of 35,226 decks)
Artifacts
10
Artifacts
10 All artifacts (10)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.92 · 25.2% (8,861 of 35,226 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.86 · 32.3% (11,385 of 35,226 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.82 · 21.6% (7,610 of 35,226 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.77 · 24.9% (8,781 of 35,226 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.77 · 20.5% (7,217 of 35,226 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.74 · 25.5% (8,968 of 35,226 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.70 · 24.3% (8,556 of 35,226 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.70 · 21.6% (7,601 of 35,226 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.68 · 21.2% (7,452 of 35,226 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.66 · 14.6% (5,129 of 35,226 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 All enchantments (3)
- Mystic Remora relevance 1.05 · 40.1% (14,134 of 35,226 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.84 · 36.3% (12,792 of 35,226 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.68 · 17.9% (6,291 of 35,226 decks)
Instants
21
Instants
21 All instants (21)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 1.55 · 39.0% (13,729 of 35,226 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 1.32 · 22.6% (7,967 of 35,226 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.99 · 23.1% (8,147 of 35,226 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.98 · 29.4% (10,342 of 35,226 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.94 · 27.1% (9,542 of 35,226 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.92 · 44.4% (15,634 of 35,226 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.90 · 38.0% (13,397 of 35,226 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.90 · 24.6% (8,676 of 35,226 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.90 · 29.1% (10,245 of 35,226 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.88 · 19.0% (6,707 of 35,226 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (6,874 of 35,226 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.85 · 22.6% (7,954 of 35,226 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.84 · 25.9% (9,123 of 35,226 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.81 · 15.6% (5,500 of 35,226 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.81 · 32.0% (11,260 of 35,226 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.79 · 19.8% (6,967 of 35,226 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.77 · 26.2% (9,245 of 35,226 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.72 · 43.5% (15,320 of 35,226 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (5,910 of 35,226 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.66 · 14.7% (5,177 of 35,226 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.66 · 27.1% (9,560 of 35,226 decks)
Utility Lands
4
Utility Lands
4 All utility lands (4)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.84 · 28.3% (9,979 of 35,226 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.79 · 20.6% (7,239 of 35,226 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.76 · 29.4% (10,340 of 35,226 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (6,107 of 35,226 decks)
Lands
6
Lands
6 All lands (6)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.79 · 27.5% (9,677 of 35,226 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.74 · 32.9% (11,584 of 35,226 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.73 · 32.2% (11,349 of 35,226 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.71 · 23.7% (8,344 of 35,226 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.67 · 28.8% (10,160 of 35,226 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.66 · 27.6% (9,709 of 35,226 decks)
EDH data for Drift of Phantasms: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 35,226 real decks.




















































































