Cards like Opt
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Archaeomancer
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Peregrine Drake
9.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Essence Flux
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Essence Flux 36%
- Teferi's Time Twist 33%
- Planar Incision 16%
- Spaceshift 9%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
6.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Impulse
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Impulse 24%
- Dig Through Time 12%
- Anticipate 11%
- Telling Time 3%
Other options: Experimental Augury
Cards like Cryogen Relic
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 61%
- Negate 45%
- Essence Scatter 6%
- Wild Unraveling 5%
- Wash Away 4%
Other options: Intervene, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Pongify
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 45%
- Rapid Hybridization 37%
Cards like Sky Diamond
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 25%
- Prismatic Lens 9%
- Coldsteel Heart 6%
- Star Compass 2%
Other options: Corrupted Grafstone, Guardian Idol, Obsidian Obelisk
Cards like Aetherize
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aetherize 30%
- Perplexing Test 16%
- Evacuation 5%
Cards like Bender's Waterskin
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Spectral Searchlight, Patriar's Seal, Victory Chimes, Honor-Worn Shaku
Cards like Mulldrifter
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mulldrifter 59%
- Quantum Riddler 4%
All top picks (50)
- Reality Acid relevance 0.64 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Sundial of the Infinite relevance 0.65 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.40 · 58.8% (87 of 148 decks)
- Skycoach Conductor // All Aboard relevance 0.47 · 32.4% (48 of 148 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.35 · 57.4% (85 of 148 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.49 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.45 · 30.4% (45 of 148 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.34 · 58.8% (87 of 148 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.39 · 40.5% (60 of 148 decks)
- H.E.R.B.I.E. Scout Unit relevance 0.46 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Loki, God of Mischief relevance 0.44 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Chakra Meditation relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.30 · 55.4% (82 of 148 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.26 · 70.3% (104 of 148 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.36 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- They Came from the Pipes relevance 0.45 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.42 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Emeritus of Ideation // Ancestral Recall relevance 0.37 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.34 · 36.5% (54 of 148 decks)
- Renet, Temporal Apprentice relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Kitsune, Dragon's Daughter relevance 0.44 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Confounding Conundrum relevance 0.41 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.41 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.35 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.37 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.34 · 31.1% (46 of 148 decks)
- Scampering Surveyor relevance 0.39 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Jadzi, Steward of Fate // Oracle's Gift relevance 0.44 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Cryptic Coat relevance 0.44 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Don't Blink relevance 0.47 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.31 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.33 · 28.4% (42 of 148 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.41 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Serum Visionary relevance 0.37 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.25 · 49.3% (73 of 148 decks)
- Shipwreck Dowser relevance 0.34 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.31 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Alexi's Cloak relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.31 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Extraordinary Journey relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.32 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.23 · 52.7% (78 of 148 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Falcon's Wing Harness relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Interdimensional Web Watch relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Skycoach Conductor // All Aboard relevance 0.47 · 32.4% (48 of 148 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.35 · 57.4% (85 of 148 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.45 · 30.4% (45 of 148 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.34 · 58.8% (87 of 148 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.39 · 40.5% (60 of 148 decks)
- H.E.R.B.I.E. Scout Unit relevance 0.46 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Loki, God of Mischief relevance 0.44 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.30 · 55.4% (82 of 148 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.26 · 70.3% (104 of 148 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.36 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.42 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Emeritus of Ideation // Ancestral Recall relevance 0.37 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.34 · 36.5% (54 of 148 decks)
- Renet, Temporal Apprentice relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Kitsune, Dragon's Daughter relevance 0.44 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.41 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.37 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.34 · 31.1% (46 of 148 decks)
- Scampering Surveyor relevance 0.39 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Jadzi, Steward of Fate // Oracle's Gift relevance 0.44 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Serum Visionary relevance 0.37 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Shipwreck Dowser relevance 0.34 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.38 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Ulamog's Reclaimer relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.36 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.28 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Nevermaker relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.21 · 51.4% (76 of 148 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.25 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.28 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Amphin Mutineer relevance 0.32 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Spellbook Seeker // Careful Study relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.33 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Kitesail Larcenist relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.23 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.24 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.29 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Augur of Bolas relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Exclusion Mage relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Salvager of Secrets relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Sundial of the Infinite relevance 0.65 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.40 · 58.8% (87 of 148 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.35 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Cryptic Coat relevance 0.44 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.33 · 28.4% (42 of 148 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.41 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Falcon's Wing Harness relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Interdimensional Web Watch relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.28 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Cursed Windbreaker relevance 0.37 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Mana Geode relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Mirror of Life Trapping relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.22 · 38.5% (57 of 148 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.28 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Arcum's Astrolabe relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Knight Paladin relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.23 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Dissection Tools relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Vessel of Endless Rest relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Spare Supplies relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.23 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Conductive Machete relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Mycosynth Wellspring relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.19 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 45.3% (67 of 148 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Potioner's Trove relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- The Irencrag relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.18 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.16 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Thunderhawk Gunship relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.16 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.17 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Reality Acid relevance 0.64 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.49 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Chakra Meditation relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- They Came from the Pipes relevance 0.45 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Confounding Conundrum relevance 0.41 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Alexi's Cloak relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Extraordinary Journey relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.34 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.33 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Roiling Dragonstorm relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Kiora Bests the Sea God relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Shimmering Wings relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- The Mirari Conjecture relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Spreading Seas relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Secret Invasion relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Frozen in Ice relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.23 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Cloudform relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Stop Cold relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Ashiok's Erasure relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Stuck in Summoner's Sanctum relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Primordial Mist relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- The Bath Song relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Ugin's Mastery relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Founding the Third Path relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Veil relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.13 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Retro-Mutation relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Gadwick's First Duel relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Necroduality relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Cradle of Safety relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Tamiyo Meets the Story Circle relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
All instants (50)
- Don't Blink relevance 0.47 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.31 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.25 · 49.3% (73 of 148 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.31 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.31 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.32 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.23 · 52.7% (78 of 148 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.26 · 35.8% (53 of 148 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.30 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.18 · 59.5% (88 of 148 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.26 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.26 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Take the Fall relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.26 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.24 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.18 · 43.9% (65 of 148 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.25 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.24 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Wild Unraveling relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Thassa's Rebuff relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.27 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Chase Inspiration relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.14 · 53.4% (79 of 148 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.16 · 37.2% (55 of 148 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.22 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.19 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Hour of Need relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.18 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.19 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.18 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.28 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.25 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.17 · 39.2% (58 of 148 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.19 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.20 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.14 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.15 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.18 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Write into Being relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Switcheroo relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.11 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (3)
- Invasion of Arcavios // Invocation of the Founders relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Invasion of Vryn // Overloaded Mage-Ring relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.25 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.23 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.17 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.15 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.15 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 52.7% (78 of 148 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.12 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 35.8% (53 of 148 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
All lands (27)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.27 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Branch of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Grixis Panorama relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Esper Panorama relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.08 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 83.8% (124 of 148 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Wiccan, Rising Magician, from 148 real Commander decks.