Harrier Naga

Played in 363 decks

Harrier Naga
$0.16 €0.02

Change per day

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
All commanders (10)
  1. Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 4.80 · 14.4% (213 of 1,484 decks)
  2. Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 3.01 · 1.8% (72 of 3,999 decks)
  3. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.79 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
  4. Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 1.02 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  5. The Sixth Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 1.02 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
  6. Tuknir Deathlock relevance 1.01 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
  7. Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.66 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
  8. Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.54 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
  9. Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
  10. God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Murasa Brute
    5.50 60.1%
    $0.17 €0.04
  • Centaur Courser
    5.22 60.1%
    $0.12 €0.05
  • Kalonian Tusker
    5.02 69.4%
    $0.24 €0.24
  • Leatherback Baloth
    4.93 69.7%
    $0.32 €0.33
  • Swordwise Centaur
    4.85 63.1%
    $0.10 €0.16
  • Terrain Elemental
    4.51 60.1%
    $0.13 €0.17
  • Nessian Courser
    4.43 48.2%
    $0.04 €0.05
  • Elvish Warrior
    4.42 53.4%
    $0.31 €0.21
  • Rumbling Baloth
    4.41 53.7%
    $0.33 €0.18
  • Garruk's Gorehorn
    4.36 60.9%
    $0.24 €0.11
All most relevant (30)
  1. Murasa Brute relevance 5.50 · 60.1% (218 of 363 decks)
  2. Centaur Courser relevance 5.22 · 60.1% (218 of 363 decks)
  3. Kalonian Tusker relevance 5.02 · 69.4% (252 of 363 decks)
  4. Leatherback Baloth relevance 4.93 · 69.7% (253 of 363 decks)
  5. Swordwise Centaur relevance 4.85 · 63.1% (229 of 363 decks)
  6. Terrain Elemental relevance 4.51 · 60.1% (218 of 363 decks)
  7. Nessian Courser relevance 4.43 · 48.2% (175 of 363 decks)
  8. Elvish Warrior relevance 4.42 · 53.4% (194 of 363 decks)
  9. Rumbling Baloth relevance 4.41 · 53.7% (195 of 363 decks)
  10. Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 4.36 · 60.9% (221 of 363 decks)
  11. Orazca Frillback relevance 4.34 · 57.9% (210 of 363 decks)
  12. Vorstclaw relevance 4.34 · 59.5% (216 of 363 decks)
  13. Alpine Grizzly relevance 4.29 · 65.3% (237 of 363 decks)
  14. Gnarled Mass relevance 4.26 · 43.8% (159 of 363 decks)
  15. Gigantosaurus relevance 4.22 · 74.4% (270 of 363 decks)
  16. Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 4.16 · 61.2% (222 of 363 decks)
  17. Grizzled Outrider relevance 4.09 · 47.9% (174 of 363 decks)
  18. Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 4.03 · 66.9% (243 of 363 decks)
  19. Colossapede relevance 3.90 · 46.3% (168 of 363 decks)
  20. Primordial Wurm relevance 3.86 · 52.3% (190 of 363 decks)
  21. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 3.80 · 60.6% (220 of 363 decks)
  22. Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 3.79 · 49.3% (179 of 363 decks)
  23. Ferocious Zheng relevance 3.79 · 41.6% (151 of 363 decks)
  24. Ancient Brontodon relevance 3.76 · 52.3% (190 of 363 decks)
  25. Grizzly Bears relevance 3.36 · 52.1% (189 of 363 decks)
  26. Runeclaw Bear relevance 3.29 · 49.6% (180 of 363 decks)
  27. Quilled Slagwurm relevance 3.24 · 42.1% (153 of 363 decks)
  28. Hollowhenge Beast relevance 3.23 · 35.0% (127 of 363 decks)
  29. Cowl Prowler relevance 2.98 · 33.6% (122 of 363 decks)
  30. Trained Armodon relevance 2.93 · 30.3% (110 of 363 decks)

Creatures

43

Showing 1-10 of 43

Page size
  • Murasa Brute
    5.50 60.1%
    $0.17 €0.04
  • Centaur Courser
    5.22 60.1%
    $0.12 €0.05
  • Kalonian Tusker
    5.02 69.4%
    $0.24 €0.24
  • Leatherback Baloth
    4.93 69.7%
    $0.32 €0.33
  • Swordwise Centaur
    4.85 63.1%
    $0.10 €0.16
  • Terrain Elemental
    4.51 60.1%
    $0.13 €0.17
  • Nessian Courser
    4.43 48.2%
    $0.04 €0.05
  • Elvish Warrior
    4.42 53.4%
    $0.31 €0.21
  • Rumbling Baloth
    4.41 53.7%
    $0.33 €0.18
  • Garruk's Gorehorn
    4.36 60.9%
    $0.24 €0.11
All creatures (43)
  1. Murasa Brute relevance 5.50 · 60.1% (218 of 363 decks)
  2. Centaur Courser relevance 5.22 · 60.1% (218 of 363 decks)
  3. Kalonian Tusker relevance 5.02 · 69.4% (252 of 363 decks)
  4. Leatherback Baloth relevance 4.93 · 69.7% (253 of 363 decks)
  5. Swordwise Centaur relevance 4.85 · 63.1% (229 of 363 decks)
  6. Terrain Elemental relevance 4.51 · 60.1% (218 of 363 decks)
  7. Nessian Courser relevance 4.43 · 48.2% (175 of 363 decks)
  8. Elvish Warrior relevance 4.42 · 53.4% (194 of 363 decks)
  9. Rumbling Baloth relevance 4.41 · 53.7% (195 of 363 decks)
  10. Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 4.36 · 60.9% (221 of 363 decks)
  11. Orazca Frillback relevance 4.34 · 57.9% (210 of 363 decks)
  12. Vorstclaw relevance 4.34 · 59.5% (216 of 363 decks)
  13. Alpine Grizzly relevance 4.29 · 65.3% (237 of 363 decks)
  14. Gnarled Mass relevance 4.26 · 43.8% (159 of 363 decks)
  15. Gigantosaurus relevance 4.22 · 74.4% (270 of 363 decks)
  16. Grizzled Outrider relevance 4.09 · 47.9% (174 of 363 decks)
  17. Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 4.03 · 66.9% (243 of 363 decks)
  18. Colossapede relevance 3.90 · 46.3% (168 of 363 decks)
  19. Primordial Wurm relevance 3.86 · 52.3% (190 of 363 decks)
  20. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 3.80 · 60.6% (220 of 363 decks)
  21. Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 3.79 · 49.3% (179 of 363 decks)
  22. Ferocious Zheng relevance 3.79 · 41.6% (151 of 363 decks)
  23. Ancient Brontodon relevance 3.76 · 52.3% (190 of 363 decks)
  24. Grizzly Bears relevance 3.36 · 52.1% (189 of 363 decks)
  25. Runeclaw Bear relevance 3.29 · 49.6% (180 of 363 decks)
  26. Quilled Slagwurm relevance 3.24 · 42.1% (153 of 363 decks)
  27. Hollowhenge Beast relevance 3.23 · 35.0% (127 of 363 decks)
  28. Cowl Prowler relevance 2.98 · 33.6% (122 of 363 decks)
  29. Trained Armodon relevance 2.93 · 30.3% (110 of 363 decks)
  30. Norwood Ranger relevance 2.87 · 31.1% (113 of 363 decks)
  31. Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.74 · 34.2% (124 of 363 decks)
  32. Balduvian Bears relevance 2.60 · 38.3% (139 of 363 decks)
  33. Bear Cub relevance 2.59 · 39.1% (142 of 363 decks)
  34. Woodland Druid relevance 2.56 · 27.3% (99 of 363 decks)
  35. Enormous Baloth relevance 2.42 · 28.9% (105 of 363 decks)
  36. Panther Warriors relevance 2.26 · 26.2% (95 of 363 decks)
  37. Elvish Ranger relevance 2.25 · 25.9% (94 of 363 decks)
  38. Broodhunter Wurm relevance 1.85 · 19.8% (72 of 363 decks)
  39. Kindercatch relevance 1.60 · 16.5% (60 of 363 decks)
  40. Spined Karok relevance 1.58 · 16.0% (58 of 363 decks)
  41. Cylian Elf relevance 1.43 · 15.2% (55 of 363 decks)
  42. Colossodon Yearling relevance 1.41 · 14.9% (54 of 363 decks)
  43. Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.39 · 18.2% (66 of 363 decks)

Enchantments

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Muraganda Petroglyphs
    4.16 61.2%
    $0.71 €0.47
  • Gaea's Anthem
    2.37 34.7%
    $0.33 €0.17
  • Sylvan Anthem
    2.30 42.7%
    $1.81 €0.94
  • Unnatural Growth
    1.67 45.5%
    $3.92 €1.44
  • Sandwurm Convergence
    1.45 27.5%
    $0.36 €0.15
All enchantments (5)
  1. Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 4.16 · 61.2% (222 of 363 decks)
  2. Gaea's Anthem relevance 2.37 · 34.7% (126 of 363 decks)
  3. Sylvan Anthem relevance 2.30 · 42.7% (155 of 363 decks)
  4. Unnatural Growth relevance 1.67 · 45.5% (165 of 363 decks)
  5. Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.45 · 27.5% (100 of 363 decks)

Sorceries

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Ezuri's Predation
    1.46 32.8%
    $3.14 €2.75
All sorceries (1)
  1. Ezuri's Predation relevance 1.46 · 32.8% (119 of 363 decks)

Planeswalkers

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Garruk, Primal Hunter
    1.53 30.0%
    $1.90 €1.57
All planeswalkers (1)
  1. Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.53 · 30.0% (109 of 363 decks)

EDH data for Harrier Naga: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 363 real decks.