Harrier Naga

Played in 359 decks

Harrier Naga
$0.16 €0.02

Change per day

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
All commanders (10)
  1. Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 4.78 · 14.3% (210 of 1,473 decks)
  2. Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 3.01 · 1.8% (72 of 3,958 decks)
  3. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.79 · 7.7% (9 of 117 decks)
  4. Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 1.03 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  5. The Sixth Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 1.02 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
  6. Tuknir Deathlock relevance 1.01 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
  7. Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.66 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
  8. Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
  9. Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.40 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
  10. God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Murasa Brute
    5.53 60.4%
    $0.17 €0.04
  • Centaur Courser
    5.24 60.2%
    $0.12 €0.05
  • Kalonian Tusker
    4.98 68.8%
    $0.25 €0.26
  • Leatherback Baloth
    4.90 69.4%
    $0.32 €0.33
  • Swordwise Centaur
    4.84 63.0%
    $0.10 €0.16
  • Terrain Elemental
    4.50 59.9%
    $0.13 €0.20
  • Nessian Courser
    4.43 48.2%
    $0.04 €0.05
  • Rumbling Baloth
    4.41 53.8%
    $0.33 €0.18
  • Elvish Warrior
    4.40 53.2%
    $0.31 €0.21
  • Garruk's Gorehorn
    4.38 61.3%
    $0.23 €0.11
All most relevant (30)
  1. Murasa Brute relevance 5.53 · 60.4% (217 of 359 decks)
  2. Centaur Courser relevance 5.24 · 60.2% (216 of 359 decks)
  3. Kalonian Tusker relevance 4.98 · 68.8% (247 of 359 decks)
  4. Leatherback Baloth relevance 4.90 · 69.4% (249 of 359 decks)
  5. Swordwise Centaur relevance 4.84 · 63.0% (226 of 359 decks)
  6. Terrain Elemental relevance 4.50 · 59.9% (215 of 359 decks)
  7. Nessian Courser relevance 4.43 · 48.2% (173 of 359 decks)
  8. Rumbling Baloth relevance 4.41 · 53.8% (193 of 359 decks)
  9. Elvish Warrior relevance 4.40 · 53.2% (191 of 359 decks)
  10. Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 4.38 · 61.3% (220 of 359 decks)
  11. Orazca Frillback relevance 4.35 · 57.9% (208 of 359 decks)
  12. Vorstclaw relevance 4.33 · 59.3% (213 of 359 decks)
  13. Alpine Grizzly relevance 4.30 · 65.5% (235 of 359 decks)
  14. Gnarled Mass relevance 4.28 · 44.0% (158 of 359 decks)
  15. Gigantosaurus relevance 4.21 · 74.1% (266 of 359 decks)
  16. Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 4.15 · 61.0% (219 of 359 decks)
  17. Grizzled Outrider relevance 4.11 · 48.2% (173 of 359 decks)
  18. Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 4.00 · 66.6% (239 of 359 decks)
  19. Colossapede relevance 3.90 · 46.2% (166 of 359 decks)
  20. Primordial Wurm relevance 3.86 · 52.4% (188 of 359 decks)
  21. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 3.78 · 60.2% (216 of 359 decks)
  22. Ferocious Zheng relevance 3.78 · 41.5% (149 of 359 decks)
  23. Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 3.77 · 49.0% (176 of 359 decks)
  24. Ancient Brontodon relevance 3.72 · 51.8% (186 of 359 decks)
  25. Grizzly Bears relevance 3.34 · 51.8% (186 of 359 decks)
  26. Runeclaw Bear relevance 3.29 · 49.6% (178 of 359 decks)
  27. Hollowhenge Beast relevance 3.24 · 35.1% (126 of 359 decks)
  28. Quilled Slagwurm relevance 3.19 · 41.5% (149 of 359 decks)
  29. Cowl Prowler relevance 2.99 · 33.7% (121 of 359 decks)
  30. Trained Armodon relevance 2.91 · 30.1% (108 of 359 decks)

Creatures

43

Showing 1-10 of 43

Page size
  • Murasa Brute
    5.53 60.4%
    $0.17 €0.04
  • Centaur Courser
    5.24 60.2%
    $0.12 €0.05
  • Kalonian Tusker
    4.98 68.8%
    $0.25 €0.26
  • Leatherback Baloth
    4.90 69.4%
    $0.32 €0.33
  • Swordwise Centaur
    4.84 63.0%
    $0.10 €0.16
  • Terrain Elemental
    4.50 59.9%
    $0.13 €0.20
  • Nessian Courser
    4.43 48.2%
    $0.04 €0.05
  • Rumbling Baloth
    4.41 53.8%
    $0.33 €0.18
  • Elvish Warrior
    4.40 53.2%
    $0.31 €0.21
  • Garruk's Gorehorn
    4.38 61.3%
    $0.23 €0.11
All creatures (43)
  1. Murasa Brute relevance 5.53 · 60.4% (217 of 359 decks)
  2. Centaur Courser relevance 5.24 · 60.2% (216 of 359 decks)
  3. Kalonian Tusker relevance 4.98 · 68.8% (247 of 359 decks)
  4. Leatherback Baloth relevance 4.90 · 69.4% (249 of 359 decks)
  5. Swordwise Centaur relevance 4.84 · 63.0% (226 of 359 decks)
  6. Terrain Elemental relevance 4.50 · 59.9% (215 of 359 decks)
  7. Nessian Courser relevance 4.43 · 48.2% (173 of 359 decks)
  8. Rumbling Baloth relevance 4.41 · 53.8% (193 of 359 decks)
  9. Elvish Warrior relevance 4.40 · 53.2% (191 of 359 decks)
  10. Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 4.38 · 61.3% (220 of 359 decks)
  11. Orazca Frillback relevance 4.35 · 57.9% (208 of 359 decks)
  12. Vorstclaw relevance 4.33 · 59.3% (213 of 359 decks)
  13. Alpine Grizzly relevance 4.30 · 65.5% (235 of 359 decks)
  14. Gnarled Mass relevance 4.28 · 44.0% (158 of 359 decks)
  15. Gigantosaurus relevance 4.21 · 74.1% (266 of 359 decks)
  16. Grizzled Outrider relevance 4.11 · 48.2% (173 of 359 decks)
  17. Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 4.00 · 66.6% (239 of 359 decks)
  18. Colossapede relevance 3.90 · 46.2% (166 of 359 decks)
  19. Primordial Wurm relevance 3.86 · 52.4% (188 of 359 decks)
  20. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 3.78 · 60.2% (216 of 359 decks)
  21. Ferocious Zheng relevance 3.78 · 41.5% (149 of 359 decks)
  22. Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 3.77 · 49.0% (176 of 359 decks)
  23. Ancient Brontodon relevance 3.72 · 51.8% (186 of 359 decks)
  24. Grizzly Bears relevance 3.34 · 51.8% (186 of 359 decks)
  25. Runeclaw Bear relevance 3.29 · 49.6% (178 of 359 decks)
  26. Hollowhenge Beast relevance 3.24 · 35.1% (126 of 359 decks)
  27. Quilled Slagwurm relevance 3.19 · 41.5% (149 of 359 decks)
  28. Cowl Prowler relevance 2.99 · 33.7% (121 of 359 decks)
  29. Trained Armodon relevance 2.91 · 30.1% (108 of 359 decks)
  30. Norwood Ranger relevance 2.85 · 30.9% (111 of 359 decks)
  31. Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.73 · 34.0% (122 of 359 decks)
  32. Balduvian Bears relevance 2.61 · 38.4% (138 of 359 decks)
  33. Bear Cub relevance 2.58 · 39.0% (140 of 359 decks)
  34. Woodland Druid relevance 2.54 · 27.0% (97 of 359 decks)
  35. Enormous Baloth relevance 2.44 · 29.2% (105 of 359 decks)
  36. Panther Warriors relevance 2.29 · 26.5% (95 of 359 decks)
  37. Elvish Ranger relevance 2.27 · 26.2% (94 of 359 decks)
  38. Broodhunter Wurm relevance 1.82 · 19.5% (70 of 359 decks)
  39. Kindercatch relevance 1.61 · 16.7% (60 of 359 decks)
  40. Spined Karok relevance 1.54 · 15.6% (56 of 359 decks)
  41. Colossodon Yearling relevance 1.42 · 15.0% (54 of 359 decks)
  42. Cylian Elf relevance 1.41 · 15.0% (54 of 359 decks)
  43. Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.41 · 18.4% (66 of 359 decks)

Enchantments

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Muraganda Petroglyphs
    4.15 61.0%
    $0.72 €0.39
  • Gaea's Anthem
    2.38 34.8%
    $0.33 €0.17
  • Sylvan Anthem
    2.29 42.6%
    $1.75 €0.77
  • Unnatural Growth
    1.67 45.4%
    $3.94 €1.57
  • Sandwurm Convergence
    1.44 27.3%
    $0.36 €0.19
All enchantments (5)
  1. Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 4.15 · 61.0% (219 of 359 decks)
  2. Gaea's Anthem relevance 2.38 · 34.8% (125 of 359 decks)
  3. Sylvan Anthem relevance 2.29 · 42.6% (153 of 359 decks)
  4. Unnatural Growth relevance 1.67 · 45.4% (163 of 359 decks)
  5. Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.44 · 27.3% (98 of 359 decks)

Sorceries

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Ezuri's Predation
    1.44 32.3%
    $3.15 €2.81
All sorceries (1)
  1. Ezuri's Predation relevance 1.44 · 32.3% (116 of 359 decks)

Planeswalkers

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Garruk, Primal Hunter
    1.52 29.8%
    $1.96 €1.48
All planeswalkers (1)
  1. Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.52 · 29.8% (107 of 359 decks)

EDH data for Harrier Naga: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 359 real decks.