Hazard of the Dunes

Played in 1,601 decks

Hazard of the Dunes
$0.17 €0.09

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 4.93 · 26.7% (631 of 2,363 decks)
  2. Loot, the Pathfinder relevance 3.25 · 2.7% (65 of 2,383 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.74 · 1.6% (69 of 4,229 decks)
  4. Redshift, Rocketeer Chief relevance 2.49 · 2.9% (28 of 958 decks)
  5. Caradora, Heart of Alacria relevance 2.21 · 2.6% (20 of 779 decks)
  6. Sita Varma, Masked Racer relevance 2.16 · 5.5% (10 of 182 decks)
  7. Samut, the Driving Force relevance 1.79 · 1.1% (22 of 2,039 decks)
  8. Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 1.76 · 1.1% (18 of 1,685 decks)
  9. Lagorin, Soul of Alacria relevance 1.39 · 5.4% (4 of 74 decks)
  10. Graham O'Brien // The Fifth Doctor relevance 1.15 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
  11. Haliya, Ascendant Cadet relevance 1.13 · 1.5% (5 of 332 decks)
  12. Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.01 · 2.2% (21 of 962 decks)
  13. The Fourth Doctor // Rose Noble relevance 1.00 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
  14. Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.88 · 1.7% (2 of 121 decks)
  15. Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.77 · 1.2% (25 of 2,111 decks)
  16. Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.76 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
  17. Ravos, Soultender // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.69 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
  18. Shang-Chi, Martial Mentor relevance 0.66 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
  19. Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.66 · 1.4% (2 of 147 decks)
  20. Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.52 · 3.0% (3 of 101 decks)
  21. Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
  22. The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.49 · 1.9% (4 of 208 decks)
  23. Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.48 · 1.5% (5 of 334 decks)
  24. Akroma, Vision of Ixidor // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.44 · 1.6% (1 of 63 decks)
  25. Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
  26. Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Master Chef relevance 0.39 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
  27. Michelangelo, Game Master relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
  28. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
  29. Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.25 · 1.1% (2 of 181 decks)
  30. Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.24 · 1.0% (2 of 194 decks)

Parallel Cards

7

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Engulfing Slagwurm
    2.75 39.2%
    $0.55 €0.52
  • Balustrade Wurm
    2.59 34.8%
    $0.27 €0.22
  • Bellowing Tanglewurm
    2.55 41.0%
    $0.81 €0.91
  • Pelakka Wurm
    2.49 36.9%
    $0.28 €0.20
  • Penumbra Wurm
    2.49 32.3%
    $0.34 €0.22
  • Impervious Greatwurm
    2.38 40.5%
    $4.78 €2.42
  • Bramble Wurm
    2.32 31.4%
    $0.33 €0.52
  • Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans
    2.24 34.7%
    $0.27 €0.12
  • Worldspine Wurm
    2.21 43.1%
    $4.20 €2.51
  • Colossal Rattlewurm
    2.21 31.4%
    $0.31 €0.25
All most relevant (30)
  1. Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 2.75 · 39.2% (628 of 1,601 decks)
  2. Balustrade Wurm relevance 2.59 · 34.8% (557 of 1,601 decks)
  3. Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 2.55 · 41.0% (657 of 1,601 decks)
  4. Pelakka Wurm relevance 2.49 · 36.9% (591 of 1,601 decks)
  5. Penumbra Wurm relevance 2.49 · 32.3% (517 of 1,601 decks)
  6. Impervious Greatwurm relevance 2.38 · 40.5% (649 of 1,601 decks)
  7. Bramble Wurm relevance 2.32 · 31.4% (502 of 1,601 decks)
  8. Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 2.24 · 34.7% (555 of 1,601 decks)
  9. Worldspine Wurm relevance 2.21 · 43.1% (690 of 1,601 decks)
  10. Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 2.21 · 31.4% (503 of 1,601 decks)
  11. Elderscale Wurm relevance 2.19 · 29.7% (476 of 1,601 decks)
  12. Plated Slagwurm relevance 2.15 · 27.1% (434 of 1,601 decks)
  13. Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.12 · 40.7% (652 of 1,601 decks)
  14. Sandwurm Convergence relevance 2.12 · 40.3% (645 of 1,601 decks)
  15. Emergent Woodwurm relevance 2.12 · 33.0% (529 of 1,601 decks)
  16. Sifter Wurm relevance 2.07 · 27.0% (432 of 1,601 decks)
  17. Greater Sandwurm relevance 2.02 · 27.8% (445 of 1,601 decks)
  18. Elfhame Wurm relevance 1.97 · 23.5% (376 of 1,601 decks)
  19. Bookwurm relevance 1.96 · 26.0% (417 of 1,601 decks)
  20. Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 1.91 · 23.7% (379 of 1,601 decks)
  21. Defiler of Vigor relevance 1.86 · 38.5% (617 of 1,601 decks)
  22. Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.72 · 23.5% (377 of 1,601 decks)
  23. Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.59 · 25.2% (404 of 1,601 decks)
  24. Soul Swallower relevance 1.53 · 18.6% (297 of 1,601 decks)
  25. Germinating Wurm relevance 1.51 · 19.4% (311 of 1,601 decks)
  26. Wurmcoil Engine relevance 1.38 · 31.3% (501 of 1,601 decks)
  27. Carnage Wurm relevance 1.37 · 15.9% (254 of 1,601 decks)
  28. Crush of Wurms relevance 1.28 · 16.3% (261 of 1,601 decks)
  29. Symbiotic Wurm relevance 1.28 · 16.1% (257 of 1,601 decks)
  30. Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.21 · 47.0% (753 of 1,601 decks)

Creatures

40

Showing 1-10 of 40

Page size
  • Engulfing Slagwurm
    2.75 39.2%
    $0.55 €0.52
  • Balustrade Wurm
    2.59 34.8%
    $0.27 €0.22
  • Bellowing Tanglewurm
    2.55 41.0%
    $0.81 €0.91
  • Pelakka Wurm
    2.49 36.9%
    $0.28 €0.20
  • Penumbra Wurm
    2.49 32.3%
    $0.34 €0.22
  • Impervious Greatwurm
    2.38 40.5%
    $4.78 €2.42
  • Bramble Wurm
    2.32 31.4%
    $0.33 €0.52
  • Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans
    2.24 34.7%
    $0.27 €0.12
  • Worldspine Wurm
    2.21 43.1%
    $4.20 €2.51
  • Colossal Rattlewurm
    2.21 31.4%
    $0.31 €0.25
All creatures (40)
  1. Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 2.75 · 39.2% (628 of 1,601 decks)
  2. Balustrade Wurm relevance 2.59 · 34.8% (557 of 1,601 decks)
  3. Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 2.55 · 41.0% (657 of 1,601 decks)
  4. Pelakka Wurm relevance 2.49 · 36.9% (591 of 1,601 decks)
  5. Penumbra Wurm relevance 2.49 · 32.3% (517 of 1,601 decks)
  6. Impervious Greatwurm relevance 2.38 · 40.5% (649 of 1,601 decks)
  7. Bramble Wurm relevance 2.32 · 31.4% (502 of 1,601 decks)
  8. Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 2.24 · 34.7% (555 of 1,601 decks)
  9. Worldspine Wurm relevance 2.21 · 43.1% (690 of 1,601 decks)
  10. Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 2.21 · 31.4% (503 of 1,601 decks)
  11. Elderscale Wurm relevance 2.19 · 29.7% (476 of 1,601 decks)
  12. Plated Slagwurm relevance 2.15 · 27.1% (434 of 1,601 decks)
  13. Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.12 · 40.7% (652 of 1,601 decks)
  14. Emergent Woodwurm relevance 2.12 · 33.0% (529 of 1,601 decks)
  15. Sifter Wurm relevance 2.07 · 27.0% (432 of 1,601 decks)
  16. Greater Sandwurm relevance 2.02 · 27.8% (445 of 1,601 decks)
  17. Elfhame Wurm relevance 1.97 · 23.5% (376 of 1,601 decks)
  18. Bookwurm relevance 1.96 · 26.0% (417 of 1,601 decks)
  19. Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 1.91 · 23.7% (379 of 1,601 decks)
  20. Defiler of Vigor relevance 1.86 · 38.5% (617 of 1,601 decks)
  21. Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.72 · 23.5% (377 of 1,601 decks)
  22. Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.59 · 25.2% (404 of 1,601 decks)
  23. Soul Swallower relevance 1.53 · 18.6% (297 of 1,601 decks)
  24. Germinating Wurm relevance 1.51 · 19.4% (311 of 1,601 decks)
  25. Wurmcoil Engine relevance 1.38 · 31.3% (501 of 1,601 decks)
  26. Carnage Wurm relevance 1.37 · 15.9% (254 of 1,601 decks)
  27. Symbiotic Wurm relevance 1.28 · 16.1% (257 of 1,601 decks)
  28. Iron-Craw Crusher relevance 1.16 · 13.8% (221 of 1,601 decks)
  29. Ravenous Lindwurm relevance 1.16 · 13.1% (209 of 1,601 decks)
  30. Ouroboroid relevance 1.15 · 26.7% (428 of 1,601 decks)
  31. Siege Wurm relevance 1.01 · 11.9% (190 of 1,601 decks)
  32. Witherscale Wurm relevance 0.98 · 11.2% (179 of 1,601 decks)
  33. Pouncing Wurm relevance 0.96 · 10.2% (163 of 1,601 decks)
  34. Gravetiller Wurm relevance 0.94 · 10.1% (162 of 1,601 decks)
  35. Voracious Wurm relevance 0.87 · 9.7% (156 of 1,601 decks)
  36. Phantom Wurm relevance 0.84 · 9.0% (144 of 1,601 decks)
  37. Stampeding Scurryfoot relevance 0.84 · 9.2% (148 of 1,601 decks)
  38. Roaring Slagwurm relevance 0.84 · 9.0% (144 of 1,601 decks)
  39. Deathcoil Wurm relevance 0.81 · 9.1% (146 of 1,601 decks)
  40. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.81 · 35.3% (565 of 1,601 decks)

Artifacts

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Emerald Medallion
    1.09 28.4%
    $5.55 €2.37
  • Rhonas's Monument
    0.88 17.3%
    $1.80 €1.69
All artifacts (2)
  1. Emerald Medallion relevance 1.09 · 28.4% (454 of 1,601 decks)
  2. Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.88 · 17.3% (277 of 1,601 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Sandwurm Convergence
    2.12 40.3%
    $0.36 €0.15
  • Garruk's Uprising
    1.21 47.0%
    $0.57 €0.60
  • Colossal Majesty
    0.84 17.8%
    $1.17 €1.66
All enchantments (3)
  1. Sandwurm Convergence relevance 2.12 · 40.3% (645 of 1,601 decks)
  2. Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.21 · 47.0% (753 of 1,601 decks)
  3. Colossal Majesty relevance 0.84 · 17.8% (285 of 1,601 decks)

Instants

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Ram Through
    0.96 21.7%
    $0.48 €0.28
All instants (1)
  1. Ram Through relevance 0.96 · 21.7% (348 of 1,601 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Crush of Wurms
    1.28 16.3%
    $1.62 €0.74
  • Roar of the Wurm
    0.94 11.0%
    $0.34 €0.22
  • Wurmcalling
    0.84 11.4%
    $5.85 €0.78
All sorceries (3)
  1. Crush of Wurms relevance 1.28 · 16.3% (261 of 1,601 decks)
  2. Roar of the Wurm relevance 0.94 · 11.0% (176 of 1,601 decks)
  3. Wurmcalling relevance 0.84 · 11.4% (183 of 1,601 decks)

Planeswalkers

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Garruk, Primal Hunter
    1.01 19.9%
    $1.88 €1.58
All planeswalkers (1)
  1. Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.01 · 19.9% (318 of 1,601 decks)

EDH data for Hazard of the Dunes: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,601 real decks.