530+17+2+3+4+5+4+10+
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Captain Benjamin Sisko 11.9% of decks
Captain Benjamin Sisko 11.9% of decks
Worf, Defiant Commander 11.1% of decks
Worf, Defiant Commander 11.1% of decks
Dal R'El, Augment Orphan 12.5% of decks
Dal R'El, Augment Orphan 12.5% of decks
Jean-Luc Picard, Luminary 2.1% of decks
Jean-Luc Picard, Luminary 2.1% of decks
Marwyn, the Clearcutter 2.6% of decks
Marwyn, the Clearcutter 2.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Koth, the Geomancer 56.3% of decks
Koth, the Geomancer 56.3% of decks
Sabotender 75.0% of decks
Sabotender 75.0% of decks
Spitfire Lagac 62.5% of decks
Spitfire Lagac 62.5% of decks
Tunneling Geopede 59.4% of decks
Tunneling Geopede 59.4% of decks
Valakut Exploration 50.0% of decks
Valakut Exploration 50.0% of decks
Zell Dincht 34.4% of decks
Zell Dincht 34.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Captain Benjamin Sisko relevance 3.03 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Worf, Defiant Commander relevance 1.24 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Dal R'El, Augment Orphan relevance 1.01 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Jean-Luc Picard, Luminary relevance 1.01 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Marwyn, the Clearcutter relevance 0.85 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 3.84 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 3.66 · 75.0% (24 of 32 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 3.55 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 3.53 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 2.36 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 2.04 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.75 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Akoum Hellkite relevance 1.65 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.59 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 1.58 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.40 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.34 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 1.33 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.30 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.23 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Torbran, Thane of Red Fell relevance 1.22 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 1.22 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.09 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.07 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.03 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.02 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.97 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.94 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.88 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.69 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.68 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.58 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.57 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 3.84 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 3.66 · 75.0% (24 of 32 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 3.55 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 3.53 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 2.04 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Akoum Hellkite relevance 1.65 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.59 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.40 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.34 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 1.33 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.30 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Torbran, Thane of Red Fell relevance 1.22 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 1.22 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.07 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.02 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.88 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.23 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.97 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 2.36 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.09 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.03 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
All instants (4)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.94 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.58 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.57 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.75 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Cleansing Wildfire relevance 1.58 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.69 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.68 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.56 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 1.55 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 1.20 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 1.10 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.55 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
All lands (10)
- Stomping Ground relevance 1.15 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 1.11 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.86 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.84 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.82 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.76 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.72 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.70 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Sacred Foundry relevance 0.61 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.58 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
EDH data for Captain Michael Burnham: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 32 real decks.







































