Nettle Sentinel
Played in 108 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
5.7% Simic
- Green 770 · 40.9%
- Golgari 611 · 32.5%
- Sultai 129 · 6.9%
- Simic 108 · 5.7%
- Selesnya 83 · 4.4%
- Naya 58 · 3.1%
- Other (10) 123 · 6.5%
All commanders (1)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 3.25 · 4.2% (46 of 1,087 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Heritage Druid relevance 3.80 · 63.0% (68 of 108 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 3.33 · 50.0% (54 of 108 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 3.14 · 61.1% (66 of 108 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.50 · 58.3% (63 of 108 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.24 · 73.1% (79 of 108 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.97 · 38.9% (42 of 108 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.85 · 63.9% (69 of 108 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 1.52 · 27.8% (30 of 108 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.52 · 75.0% (81 of 108 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.51 · 36.1% (39 of 108 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.49 · 33.3% (36 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.45 · 47.2% (51 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.44 · 38.9% (42 of 108 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 1.42 · 34.3% (37 of 108 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 1.36 · 27.8% (30 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.30 · 87.0% (94 of 108 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.26 · 53.7% (58 of 108 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.25 · 25.9% (28 of 108 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.21 · 37.0% (40 of 108 decks)
- Riftsweeper relevance 1.20 · 17.6% (19 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.16 · 24.1% (26 of 108 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.16 · 20.4% (22 of 108 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.13 · 28.7% (31 of 108 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.12 · 24.1% (26 of 108 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 1.12 · 33.3% (36 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.10 · 86.1% (93 of 108 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.08 · 40.7% (44 of 108 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.04 · 26.9% (29 of 108 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 1.03 · 21.3% (23 of 108 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.02 · 19.4% (21 of 108 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Heritage Druid relevance 3.80 · 63.0% (68 of 108 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 3.33 · 50.0% (54 of 108 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 3.14 · 61.1% (66 of 108 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.50 · 58.3% (63 of 108 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.24 · 73.1% (79 of 108 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.97 · 38.9% (42 of 108 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.85 · 63.9% (69 of 108 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.52 · 75.0% (81 of 108 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.51 · 36.1% (39 of 108 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.49 · 33.3% (36 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.45 · 47.2% (51 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.44 · 38.9% (42 of 108 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 1.42 · 34.3% (37 of 108 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 1.36 · 27.8% (30 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.30 · 87.0% (94 of 108 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.26 · 53.7% (58 of 108 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.25 · 25.9% (28 of 108 decks)
- Riftsweeper relevance 1.20 · 17.6% (19 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.16 · 24.1% (26 of 108 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.16 · 20.4% (22 of 108 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.13 · 28.7% (31 of 108 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.12 · 24.1% (26 of 108 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 1.12 · 33.3% (36 of 108 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.10 · 86.1% (93 of 108 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.08 · 40.7% (44 of 108 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.04 · 26.9% (29 of 108 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 1.03 · 21.3% (23 of 108 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.02 · 19.4% (21 of 108 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.01 · 22.2% (24 of 108 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 1.00 · 17.6% (19 of 108 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.99 · 23.1% (25 of 108 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.98 · 28.7% (31 of 108 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.92 · 25.0% (27 of 108 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.92 · 38.9% (42 of 108 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.87 · 30.6% (33 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.87 · 23.1% (25 of 108 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.86 · 13.9% (15 of 108 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.85 · 21.3% (23 of 108 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.84 · 18.5% (20 of 108 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (18 of 108 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.21 · 37.0% (40 of 108 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 1.00 · 39.8% (43 of 108 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.92 · 32.4% (35 of 108 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.85 · 22.2% (24 of 108 decks)
All instants (1)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.99 · 36.1% (39 of 108 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 1.52 · 27.8% (30 of 108 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.92 · 37.0% (40 of 108 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.79 · 22.2% (24 of 108 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.91 · 28.7% (31 of 108 decks)
EDH data for Nettle Sentinel: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 108 real decks.