Nettle Sentinel
Played in 57 Naya decks
30+48+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
3.0% Naya
-
Green 781 · 41.0%
-
Golgari 614 · 32.2%
-
Sultai 131 · 6.9%
-
Simic 112 · 5.9%
-
Selesnya 82 · 4.3%
-
Naya 57 · 3.0%
- Other (10) 128 · 6.7%
Most Relevant
Heritage Druid 43.9% of decks
Heritage Druid 43.9% of decks
Quirion Ranger 45.6% of decks
Quirion Ranger 45.6% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 56.1% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 56.1% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 57.9% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 57.9% of decks
Priest of Titania 57.9% of decks
Priest of Titania 57.9% of decks
Dwynen's Elite 33.3% of decks
Dwynen's Elite 33.3% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Heritage Druid relevance 2.71 · 43.9% (25 of 57 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.53 · 45.6% (26 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 2.11 · 56.1% (32 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.99 · 57.9% (33 of 57 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.92 · 57.9% (33 of 57 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.81 · 33.3% (19 of 57 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.68 · 59.6% (34 of 57 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 1.66 · 28.1% (16 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.63 · 70.2% (40 of 57 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.62 · 43.9% (25 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.61 · 31.6% (18 of 57 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 1.56 · 24.6% (14 of 57 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.51 · 38.6% (22 of 57 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.50 · 42.1% (24 of 57 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.45 · 26.3% (15 of 57 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.41 · 73.7% (42 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.40 · 29.8% (17 of 57 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.36 · 33.3% (19 of 57 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 1.25 · 22.8% (13 of 57 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.25 · 26.3% (15 of 57 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.25 · 22.8% (13 of 57 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.20 · 28.1% (16 of 57 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.20 · 35.1% (20 of 57 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.17 · 17.5% (10 of 57 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.16 · 45.6% (26 of 57 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.13 · 17.5% (10 of 57 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.11 · 22.8% (13 of 57 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 1.10 · 29.8% (17 of 57 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.08 · 19.3% (11 of 57 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 1.00 · 26.3% (15 of 57 decks)
All creatures (48)
- Heritage Druid relevance 2.71 · 43.9% (25 of 57 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.53 · 45.6% (26 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 2.11 · 56.1% (32 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.99 · 57.9% (33 of 57 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.92 · 57.9% (33 of 57 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.81 · 33.3% (19 of 57 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.68 · 59.6% (34 of 57 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 1.66 · 28.1% (16 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.63 · 70.2% (40 of 57 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.62 · 43.9% (25 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.61 · 31.6% (18 of 57 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 1.56 · 24.6% (14 of 57 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.51 · 38.6% (22 of 57 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.50 · 42.1% (24 of 57 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.45 · 26.3% (15 of 57 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.41 · 73.7% (42 of 57 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.40 · 29.8% (17 of 57 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.36 · 33.3% (19 of 57 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 1.25 · 22.8% (13 of 57 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.25 · 26.3% (15 of 57 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.25 · 22.8% (13 of 57 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.20 · 28.1% (16 of 57 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.20 · 35.1% (20 of 57 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.17 · 17.5% (10 of 57 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.16 · 45.6% (26 of 57 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.13 · 17.5% (10 of 57 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.11 · 22.8% (13 of 57 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 1.10 · 29.8% (17 of 57 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.08 · 19.3% (11 of 57 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 1.00 · 26.3% (15 of 57 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (14 of 57 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.97 · 38.6% (22 of 57 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.96 · 19.3% (11 of 57 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.96 · 19.3% (11 of 57 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 0.95 · 28.1% (16 of 57 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.94 · 21.1% (12 of 57 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.94 · 17.5% (10 of 57 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.93 · 22.8% (13 of 57 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 0.91 · 15.8% (9 of 57 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.87 · 15.8% (9 of 57 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.86 · 21.1% (12 of 57 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.85 · 24.6% (14 of 57 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.85 · 19.3% (11 of 57 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.84 · 15.8% (9 of 57 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.81 · 29.8% (17 of 57 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.78 · 19.3% (11 of 57 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.77 · 19.3% (11 of 57 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.76 · 26.3% (15 of 57 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.86 · 22.8% (13 of 57 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.83 · 15.8% (9 of 57 decks)
EDH data for Nettle Sentinel: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 57 real decks.
















