Nettle Sentinel
Played in 82 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
4.3% Selesnya
-
Green 775 · 40.9%
-
Golgari 612 · 32.3%
-
Sultai 130 · 6.9%
-
Simic 111 · 5.9%
-
Selesnya 82 · 4.3%
-
Naya 57 · 3.0%
- Other (10) 126 · 6.7%
330+40+3+1+3+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 2.61 · 1.6% (49 of 3,047 decks)
- Spider-Man India relevance 0.70 · 1.3% (2 of 150 decks)
- Chorus of the Conclave relevance 0.43 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Heritage Druid relevance 4.41 · 75.6% (62 of 82 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 2.51 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.46 · 61.0% (50 of 82 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.16 · 41.5% (34 of 82 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.10 · 57.3% (47 of 82 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.04 · 47.6% (39 of 82 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.81 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.80 · 43.9% (36 of 82 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.78 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.68 · 32.9% (27 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.68 · 32.9% (27 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.67 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.67 · 76.8% (63 of 82 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.64 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.64 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.55 · 42.7% (35 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.55 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.52 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.50 · 54.9% (45 of 82 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 1.47 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.45 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.42 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.39 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.21 · 79.3% (65 of 82 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.15 · 32.9% (27 of 82 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.15 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 1.12 · 50.0% (41 of 82 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 1.05 · 36.6% (30 of 82 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.04 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.01 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Heritage Druid relevance 4.41 · 75.6% (62 of 82 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 2.51 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.46 · 61.0% (50 of 82 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.16 · 41.5% (34 of 82 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.10 · 57.3% (47 of 82 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.04 · 47.6% (39 of 82 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.81 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.80 · 43.9% (36 of 82 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.78 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.68 · 32.9% (27 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.68 · 32.9% (27 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.67 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.67 · 76.8% (63 of 82 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.64 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.64 · 31.7% (26 of 82 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.55 · 42.7% (35 of 82 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.52 · 34.1% (28 of 82 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.50 · 54.9% (45 of 82 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.45 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.42 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.39 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.21 · 79.3% (65 of 82 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.15 · 32.9% (27 of 82 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.15 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 1.12 · 50.0% (41 of 82 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.04 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.01 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.98 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Nullmage Shepherd relevance 0.94 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Pelt Collector relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.91 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.88 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Midnight Guard relevance 0.86 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 0.86 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.84 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Hexhunter relevance 0.84 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.81 · 22.0% (18 of 82 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.76 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.75 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.91 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.79 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.74 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
All instants (1)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.92 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.55 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 1.47 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 1.05 · 36.6% (30 of 82 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.49 · 37.8% (31 of 82 decks)
All lands (2)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.88 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.78 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
EDH data for Nettle Sentinel: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 82 real decks.

































