Nettle Sentinel
Played in 130 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
6.9% Sultai
- Green 770 · 40.9%
- Golgari 610 · 32.4%
- Sultai 130 · 6.9%
- Simic 108 · 5.7%
- Selesnya 83 · 4.4%
- Naya 58 · 3.1%
- Other (10) 122 · 6.5%
All commanders (2)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.29 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.41 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Heritage Druid relevance 3.25 · 69.2% (90 of 130 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 2.23 · 53.8% (70 of 130 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.09 · 56.9% (74 of 130 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 2.05 · 35.4% (46 of 130 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.94 · 86.2% (112 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.74 · 44.6% (58 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.74 · 76.2% (99 of 130 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.48 · 53.8% (70 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.47 · 83.1% (108 of 130 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.46 · 61.5% (80 of 130 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.45 · 59.2% (77 of 130 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.43 · 43.1% (56 of 130 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.37 · 43.1% (56 of 130 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.37 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.36 · 58.5% (76 of 130 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.35 · 41.5% (54 of 130 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.35 · 38.5% (50 of 130 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.24 · 85.4% (111 of 130 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.23 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.16 · 42.3% (55 of 130 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 1.15 · 41.5% (54 of 130 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.15 · 49.2% (64 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.11 · 30.8% (40 of 130 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.10 · 27.7% (36 of 130 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.08 · 32.3% (42 of 130 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 1.06 · 48.5% (63 of 130 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.99 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.97 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.96 · 29.2% (38 of 130 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.95 · 29.2% (38 of 130 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Heritage Druid relevance 3.25 · 69.2% (90 of 130 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 2.23 · 53.8% (70 of 130 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.09 · 56.9% (74 of 130 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 2.05 · 35.4% (46 of 130 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.94 · 86.2% (112 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.74 · 44.6% (58 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.74 · 76.2% (99 of 130 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.48 · 53.8% (70 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.47 · 83.1% (108 of 130 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.46 · 61.5% (80 of 130 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.45 · 59.2% (77 of 130 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.43 · 43.1% (56 of 130 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.37 · 43.1% (56 of 130 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.37 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.36 · 58.5% (76 of 130 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.35 · 41.5% (54 of 130 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.35 · 38.5% (50 of 130 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.24 · 85.4% (111 of 130 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.23 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.16 · 42.3% (55 of 130 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 1.15 · 41.5% (54 of 130 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.15 · 49.2% (64 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.11 · 30.8% (40 of 130 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.10 · 27.7% (36 of 130 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.08 · 32.3% (42 of 130 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 1.06 · 48.5% (63 of 130 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.99 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.96 · 29.2% (38 of 130 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.95 · 29.2% (38 of 130 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (33 of 130 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.92 · 23.1% (30 of 130 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.89 · 32.3% (42 of 130 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.89 · 31.5% (41 of 130 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.88 · 33.1% (43 of 130 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.87 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.86 · 26.2% (34 of 130 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.85 · 38.5% (50 of 130 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.81 · 23.1% (30 of 130 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.80 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.79 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.76 · 24.6% (32 of 130 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.75 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.97 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.89 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.80 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.90 · 27.7% (36 of 130 decks)
All instants (1)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.84 · 26.2% (34 of 130 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.87 · 26.9% (35 of 130 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.76 · 26.9% (35 of 130 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.17 · 30.8% (40 of 130 decks)
EDH data for Nettle Sentinel: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 130 real decks.