Wave of Vitriol
Played in 112 Selesnya decks
430+24+3+4+10+5+4+
Color Identity Spread
3.0% Selesnya
Commanders
Yasharn, Implacable Earth 1.8% of decks
Yasharn, Implacable Earth 1.8% of decks
Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor 1.9% of decks
Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor 1.9% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist 25.0% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist 25.0% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Prava of the Steel Legion 2.9% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Prava of the Steel Legion 2.9% of decks
Most Relevant
Lotus Cobra 13.4% of decks
Lotus Cobra 13.4% of decks
Bane of Progress 10.7% of decks
Bane of Progress 10.7% of decks
Harmonize 23.2% of decks
Harmonize 23.2% of decks
Rampant Growth 35.7% of decks
Rampant Growth 35.7% of decks
Collector Ouphe 13.4% of decks
Collector Ouphe 13.4% of decks
Sakura-Tribe Elder 17.9% of decks
Sakura-Tribe Elder 17.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 1.57 · 1.8% (11 of 609 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.89 · 1.9% (3 of 158 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist relevance 0.78 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Prava of the Steel Legion relevance 0.50 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.49 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.47 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.47 · 35.7% (40 of 112 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.46 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.45 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.44 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.42 · 25.9% (29 of 112 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.41 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.41 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.41 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.41 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.39 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.38 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.37 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.37 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (8 of 112 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.37 · 24.1% (27 of 112 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (21 of 112 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.36 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.36 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (8 of 112 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.33 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.33 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.49 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.46 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.45 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.41 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.41 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.41 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.41 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.39 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.37 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.37 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.37 · 24.1% (27 of 112 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (21 of 112 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.36 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (8 of 112 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.33 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.33 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.33 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.32 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (8 of 112 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.33 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
All instants (4)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.38 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.36 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.32 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Harmonize relevance 0.47 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.47 · 35.7% (40 of 112 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.44 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.42 · 25.9% (29 of 112 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.44 · 18.8% (21 of 112 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.40 · 22.3% (25 of 112 decks)
- Emeria, the Sky Ruin relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.32 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
All lands (4)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.35 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.32 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
EDH data for Wave of Vitriol: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 112 real decks.










































