Fortitude
Played in 38 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Jund
-
Green 777 · 40.8%
-
Gruul 503 · 26.4%
-
Golgari 349 · 18.3%
-
Sultai 76 · 4.0%
-
Selesnya 58 · 3.0%
-
Jund 38 · 2.0%
- Other (9) 105 · 5.5%
30+29+3+3+5+3+4+3+
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.04 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.01 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.97 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.85 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.83 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.79 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.76 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.75 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.74 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.72 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.70 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.69 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.68 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.68 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.68 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.67 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Mazirek, Kraul Death Priest relevance 0.67 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.65 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.65 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.64 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.63 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.55 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.54 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.53 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- God-Eternal Bontu relevance 0.53 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.51 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.50 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.50 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.49 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.04 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.85 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.83 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.76 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.75 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.74 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.70 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.68 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.68 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.67 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Mazirek, Kraul Death Priest relevance 0.67 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.65 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.65 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.64 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.63 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.54 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- God-Eternal Bontu relevance 0.53 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.51 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.50 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.48 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.47 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.46 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.44 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.44 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Korvold, Fae-Cursed King relevance 0.42 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.42 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Mayhem Devil relevance 0.41 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.39 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.01 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.50 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.49 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Rancor relevance 0.97 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.79 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.69 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
All instants (5)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.72 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.55 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.53 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.48 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.68 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.46 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.44 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Eumidian Hatchery relevance 0.62 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.47 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.44 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Twisted Landscape relevance 0.42 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
All lands (3)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.74 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.66 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.43 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
EDH data for Fortitude: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 38 real decks.









































