Rebuild
Played in 114 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (6)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 1.23 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.06 · 8.7% (2 of 23 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.87 · 1.4% (3 of 212 decks)
- Beast, Erudite Aerialist relevance 0.52 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.44 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.40 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.96 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.89 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.56 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.55 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.54 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.53 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Wave of Vitriol relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.52 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.43 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.42 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.42 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.42 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.41 · 32.5% (37 of 114 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.40 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.38 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.37 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.37 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.36 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.35 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.52 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.42 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.40 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.37 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.38 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
All instants (16)
- Filter Out relevance 0.89 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.53 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.43 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.42 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.42 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.37 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.36 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.35 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.32 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.96 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.56 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.55 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.54 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Wave of Vitriol relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (9 of 114 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.41 · 32.5% (37 of 114 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.34 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (10 of 114 decks)
All utility lands (9)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.81 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.72 · 21.1% (24 of 114 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.59 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.56 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.43 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.39 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.38 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.35 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.33 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
All lands (3)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.44 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
EDH data for Rebuild: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 114 real decks.