Pir's Whim
Played in 853 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- M'Baku, Jabari Chieftain relevance 3.64 · 58.3% (49 of 84 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.94 · 12.2% (98 of 806 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 2.58 · 18.3% (36 of 197 decks)
- Shizuko, Caller of Autumn relevance 2.03 · 15.1% (19 of 126 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.28 · 2.5% (33 of 1,327 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 1.27 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 1.05 · 7.1% (6 of 85 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 0.98 · 2.8% (12 of 427 decks)
- Iwamori of the Open Fist relevance 0.90 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.89 · 1.6% (19 of 1,163 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.89 · 1.1% (40 of 3,695 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.88 · 2.8% (9 of 323 decks)
- Multani, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.85 · 2.6% (9 of 352 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.67 · 1.3% (11 of 822 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.66 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Hardy Outlander // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.66 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.64 · 9.1% (2 of 22 decks)
- Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 0.62 · 1.5% (8 of 537 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.62 · 1.9% (6 of 317 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.60 · 3.8% (3 of 78 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.57 · 1.6% (6 of 375 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.56 · 1.4% (7 of 515 decks)
- Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant relevance 0.53 · 5.0% (2 of 40 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Dosan the Falling Leaf relevance 0.47 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (5 of 395 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.46 · 1.5% (4 of 260 decks)
- Mister Immortal relevance 0.46 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.42 · 2.8% (2 of 71 decks)
- Galion, Elvenking's Butler relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.21 · 32.9% (281 of 853 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.12 · 35.4% (302 of 853 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (213 of 853 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.82 · 15.5% (132 of 853 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.74 · 24.7% (211 of 853 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.73 · 24.5% (209 of 853 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.72 · 17.2% (147 of 853 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.67 · 12.8% (109 of 853 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.67 · 39.2% (334 of 853 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.66 · 46.2% (394 of 853 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.65 · 19.0% (162 of 853 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.62 · 30.7% (262 of 853 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.62 · 18.5% (158 of 853 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (86 of 853 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.56 · 19.1% (163 of 853 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (140 of 853 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.54 · 21.6% (184 of 853 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.53 · 28.0% (239 of 853 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.52 · 21.9% (187 of 853 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.52 · 19.7% (168 of 853 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.52 · 18.3% (156 of 853 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.50 · 24.5% (209 of 853 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.50 · 26.3% (224 of 853 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.50 · 23.4% (200 of 853 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.49 · 17.9% (153 of 853 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.49 · 30.1% (257 of 853 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.49 · 39.2% (334 of 853 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.49 · 21.8% (186 of 853 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.48 · 17.5% (149 of 853 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.48 · 26.5% (226 of 853 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.74 · 24.7% (211 of 853 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.73 · 24.5% (209 of 853 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.62 · 30.7% (262 of 853 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.62 · 18.5% (158 of 853 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.56 · 19.1% (163 of 853 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (140 of 853 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.54 · 21.6% (184 of 853 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.52 · 21.9% (187 of 853 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.50 · 24.5% (209 of 853 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.50 · 26.3% (224 of 853 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.49 · 30.1% (257 of 853 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.49 · 21.8% (186 of 853 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.46 · 17.1% (146 of 853 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (213 of 853 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.52 · 19.7% (168 of 853 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.49 · 17.9% (153 of 853 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 0.53 · 28.0% (239 of 853 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.50 · 23.4% (200 of 853 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.45 · 16.2% (138 of 853 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.67 · 39.2% (334 of 853 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.66 · 46.2% (394 of 853 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.48 · 26.5% (226 of 853 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (96 of 853 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.21 · 32.9% (281 of 853 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.12 · 35.4% (302 of 853 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.82 · 15.5% (132 of 853 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.72 · 17.2% (147 of 853 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.67 · 12.8% (109 of 853 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.65 · 19.0% (162 of 853 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (86 of 853 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.52 · 18.3% (156 of 853 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.49 · 39.2% (334 of 853 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.48 · 17.5% (149 of 853 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.47 · 12.2% (104 of 853 decks)
All utility lands (12)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.84 · 30.6% (261 of 853 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.72 · 20.8% (177 of 853 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.61 · 30.8% (263 of 853 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.61 · 40.7% (347 of 853 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.54 · 17.2% (147 of 853 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.54 · 20.2% (172 of 853 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.52 · 30.1% (257 of 853 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.52 · 15.8% (135 of 853 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.50 · 25.2% (215 of 853 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.47 · 27.5% (235 of 853 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (135 of 853 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.47 · 34.2% (292 of 853 decks)
All lands (4)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.59 · 22.0% (188 of 853 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.56 · 14.4% (123 of 853 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.47 · 24.4% (208 of 853 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (169 of 853 decks)
EDH data for Pir's Whim: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 853 real decks.