Cards like Force of Negation
3.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 48%
- Force of Will 44%
Cards like Rhystic Study
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 53%
- Mystic Remora 50%
Cards like Fabricate
7.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 44%
- Scour for Scrap 38%
Cards like Impulse
9.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Impulse 41%
- Dig Through Time 25%
- Experimental Augury 9%
- Anticipate 5%
Other options: Telling Time
Cards like Sol Ring
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 88%
- Mana Vault 31%
- Grim Monolith 27%
- Basalt Monolith 13%
Cards like Chrome Mox
5.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 31%
- Mox Diamond 27%
Cards like Unwind
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Flusterstorm
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 31%
- Dispel 22%
- Turn Aside 3%
- Miscast 3%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass
6.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sky Diamond
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 27%
- Prismatic Lens 20%
- Star Compass 9%
- Coldsteel Heart 8%
- Guardian Idol 3%
Other options: Corrupted Grafstone, Obsidian Obelisk
Cards like Swan Song
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 44%
- Strix Serenade 16%
Cards like Misdirection
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Misdirection 23%
- Commandeer 19%
- Snapback 8%
- Disrupting Shoal 5%
Cards like Negate
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Negate 53%
- Counterspell 38%
- Essence Scatter 11%
- Wash Away 5%
- Disruption Protocol 3%
- Spell Snare 2%
- Remove Soul 2%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Think Twice
9.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Opt
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Disallow
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
- Disallow 20%
- Saw It Coming 8%
- Ertai's Scorn 6%
- Cancel 5%
- Sinister Sabotage 5%
- Broken Concentration 2%
- Wizard's Retort 2%
Other options: Scatter to the Winds, Forceful Denial, Fervent Denial, Twist Reality, Confirm Suspicions, Admiral's Order
Cards like Remand
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Remand 25%
- Exclude 8%
- Dismiss 5%
- Bone to Ash 3%
- Keep Safe 3%
- Runeboggle 2%
- Contradict 2%
Other options: Grip of Amnesia, Scatter Arc, Force Void, Laquatus's Disdain, Disrupt, Interdict, Halt Order, Squelch, Confound
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Academy Wall
Cards like Cryptic Command
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like The Reality Chip
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards like Bender's Waterskin
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Spectral Searchlight, Patriar's Seal, Honor-Worn Shaku
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mana Leak
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mana Leak 22%
- Lose Focus 3%
- Metallic Rebuke 3%
- Clash of Wills 2%
- Make Disappear 2%
- It'll Quench Ya! 2%
- Spell Pierce 2%
- Don't Make a Sound 2%
Other options: Reasonable Doubt, Revolutionary Rebuff, Force Spike, Logic Knot, Rethink, Quench
Cards like Mind Stone
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 36%
- Chromatic Sphere 3%
Cards like Leyline of Anticipation
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Displacer Kitten
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Flash Photography
8.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Transmute Artifact
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Transmute Artifact 23%
- Reshape 6%
Cards like Aetherize
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aetherize 28%
- Evacuation 9%
- Perplexing Test 6%
Cards like High Fae Trickster
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- The Vision relevance 0.37 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.28 · 40.6% (26 of 64 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.33 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.25 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.29 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.26 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.23 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.22 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.26 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Fractured Powerstone relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.24 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.22 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.25 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.23 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.22 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.23 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.20 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.22 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.17 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.23 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.23 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.16 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Plunder the Trollshaws relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.20 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Disruptor Flute relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.18 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.23 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.21 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.21 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.19 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.19 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.19 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.20 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.15 · 53.1% (34 of 64 decks)
All creatures (50)
- The Vision relevance 0.37 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.25 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.26 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Council of Reeds relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.20 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- H.E.R.B.I.E., Lovable Robot relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.18 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Molecule Man relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.14 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.16 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.13 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.14 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Bilbo, Thief in the Night relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Horned Loch-Whale // Lagoon Breach relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Ironheart, Clever Champion relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Leitmotif Composer relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.14 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Cruel Witness relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Guile relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Wiccan, Rising Magician relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.11 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Metalworker relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.11 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.26 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Fractured Powerstone relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.25 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.23 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.22 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.23 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.20 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Disruptor Flute relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.18 · 42.2% (27 of 64 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.19 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.19 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.18 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.17 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Batterskull relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.16 · 34.4% (22 of 64 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.20 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- The Irencrag relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.15 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.19 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.16 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.17 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Arc Reactor relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.15 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- N'Yami-Class Mother Ship relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.13 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Renegade Map relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.10 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Planar Atlas relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Pristine Talisman relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.23 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.23 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.21 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Chakra Meditation relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Uncover the Moon-Letters relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.12 · 53.1% (34 of 64 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.18 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.17 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.15 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Quiet Contemplation relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.12 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Leyline of Singularity relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.11 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- The Bath Song relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Dungeon Delver relevance 0.16 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Precognition relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Mark of Eviction relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Central Elevator // Promising Stairs relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Underwater Tunnel // Slimy Aquarium relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Skywise Teachings relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Ghostly Touch relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All instants (50)
- Impulse relevance 0.28 · 40.6% (26 of 64 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.29 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.22 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.22 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.20 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.17 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.23 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.16 · 54.7% (35 of 64 decks)
- Plunder the Trollshaws relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.23 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.21 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.21 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.19 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.19 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.20 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.15 · 53.1% (34 of 64 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.16 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.20 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.18 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Reset relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.17 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.19 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.15 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.18 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Confusticate and Bebother relevance 0.23 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Radical Idea relevance 0.23 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.18 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.15 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Divergent Equation relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Oona's Grace relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Leadership Vacuum relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.33 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.24 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.22 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.18 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.18 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.22 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.15 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.20 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.14 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.13 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Stolen by the Fae relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Cruel Fate relevance 0.18 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Ransack relevance 0.16 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Eye Spy relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
All planeswalkers (34)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.23 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.12 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Machinist relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Teferi, Timeless Voyager relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.10 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Sky Dancer relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Ingenious Mind-Mage relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Cunning Castaway relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.07 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.07 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, Memory Adept relevance 0.07 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.07 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.07 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.07 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.06 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Arcavios // Invocation of the Founders relevance 0.10 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.16 · 35.9% (23 of 64 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 39.1% (25 of 64 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.21 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.15 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.13 · 43.8% (28 of 64 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.16 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.15 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.13 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.12 · 9.4% (6 of 64 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.12 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.07 · 53.1% (34 of 64 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.10 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Dungeon Descent relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ice Floe relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- The Great Mound relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Underdark Rift relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.08 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Surveillance Room relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.09 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 0.10 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.10 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ominous Cemetery relevance 0.10 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.10 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Soaring Seacliff relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.09 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All lands (30)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.22 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.21 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.21 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.20 · 29.7% (19 of 64 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.22 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.19 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Glimmervoid relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (7 of 64 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.11 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (4 of 64 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.10 · 7.8% (5 of 64 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.10 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.08 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.06 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.06 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.06 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.06 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.06 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 92.2% (59 of 64 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Valeria Richards, Precocious, from 64 real Commander decks.