Cards like Prismite
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Prismite 59%
- Stonework Packbeast 56%
- Signpost Scarecrow 25%
- Mystic Skull // Mystic Monstrosity 2%
- Pili-Pala 2%
Other options: Three Tree Mascot, Scarecrow Guide, Mana Cylix, Shire Scarecrow, Salvaged Manaworker
Cards like Kiora's Follower
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Kiora's Follower 56%
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands 44%
- Ioreth of the Healing House 38%
- Kelpie Guide 34%
- Forensic Researcher 5%
- North Pole Patrol 4%
Other options: Fatestitcher
Cards like Prophet of Distortion
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Prophet of Distortion 61%
- Spectral Sailor 32%
- Tymora's Invoker 31%
- Third Path Savant 23%
- Azure Mage 10%
- Mystic Archaeologist 6%
- Oscorp Research Team 2%
Other options: Archivist
Cards like Shore Up
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shore Up 49%
- Magic Damper 32%
- Octopus Form 17%
- Dive Down 13%
Other options: Glint, Mizzium Skin, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration, You See a Guard Approach
Cards like Future Sight
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Future Sight 38%
- Magus of the Future 35%
Cards like Crab Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ringing Strike Mastery
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Stay Hidden, Stay Silent, Waterknot, Locked in the Cemetery, Tangle Kelp, Blossombind, Stunning Strike, Mesmerizing Dose, Capture Sphere, Runner's Bane, Sleep Magic, So Shiny, Sleep Paralysis, Unquenchable Thirst, Thirst, Claustrophobia, Infinite Coursework, Dramatic Accusation, Frozen in Ice, Bind the Monster, Castaway's Despair, Winter's Rest, Bewitching Leechcraft, Spectral Prison, Bitter Chill, Bubble Snare, Sleeping Potion, Charmed Sleep, Motion Sickness, Containment Protocol, Mystic Restraints, Starlight Snare, Enchanted River's Grasp
Cards like Trophy Mage
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Gretchen Titchwillow
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Vizier of the Menagerie
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 46%
- Negate 31%
Other options: Intervene, Wash Away, Wild Unraveling, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Thousand-Year Elixir
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Jandor's Saddlebags, Puppet Strings, Voltaic Construct, Synod Artificer
Cards like Sol Ring
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 70%
- Basalt Monolith 19%
- Mana Vault 5%
- Grim Monolith 4%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 46%
- Lightning Greaves 19%
Cards like Urn of Godfire
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Goblin Firebomb
Cards like Fortune Teller's Talent
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Fabricate
5.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fabricate 22%
- Scour for Scrap 10%
Cards like Energy Refractor
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Spare Supplies, Futurist Forge, Sleeper Dart, Alchemist's Vial
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Snakeskin Veil 20%
- Tyvar's Stand 10%
- Overprotect 2%
Other options: Blossoming Defense, Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Slagwurm Armor
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Slagwurm Armor 37%
- Kite Shield 5%
Other options: Greatsword, Vulshok Battlegear, Barbed Battlegear, Pennon Blade, Warlord's Axe
Cards like Heroic Intervention
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Planar Bridge
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Planar Bridge 24%
- Planar Portal 2%
Cards like Patriar's Seal
6.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Relic of Legends, Spectral Searchlight, Honor-Worn Shaku, Victory Chimes
All top picks (50)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.81 · 56.9% (123 of 216 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.86 · 45.4% (98 of 216 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.67 · 62.0% (134 of 216 decks)
- Prismite relevance 0.69 · 59.3% (128 of 216 decks)
- Stonework Packbeast relevance 0.70 · 56.0% (121 of 216 decks)
- Prophet of Distortion relevance 0.62 · 60.6% (131 of 216 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.71 · 47.2% (102 of 216 decks)
- Tymora's Invoker relevance 0.83 · 31.5% (68 of 216 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.77 · 36.6% (79 of 216 decks)
- Thassa's Ire relevance 0.78 · 32.9% (71 of 216 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.75 · 34.7% (75 of 216 decks)
- Gemstone Array relevance 0.74 · 34.3% (74 of 216 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.73 · 34.7% (75 of 216 decks)
- Crossroads Candleguide relevance 0.78 · 27.8% (60 of 216 decks)
- Singing Bell Strike relevance 0.77 · 26.9% (58 of 216 decks)
- Third Path Savant relevance 0.80 · 22.7% (49 of 216 decks)
- Signpost Scarecrow relevance 0.78 · 24.5% (53 of 216 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.68 · 38.0% (82 of 216 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.60 · 46.3% (100 of 216 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.73 · 24.5% (53 of 216 decks)
- Ringing Strike Mastery relevance 0.68 · 27.8% (60 of 216 decks)
- Dimensional Infiltrator relevance 0.65 · 25.5% (55 of 216 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.54 · 44.0% (95 of 216 decks)
- Biomechan Engineer relevance 0.59 · 32.9% (71 of 216 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.50 · 49.1% (106 of 216 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.49 · 49.1% (106 of 216 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.53 · 40.7% (88 of 216 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.61 · 23.6% (51 of 216 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.50 · 44.4% (96 of 216 decks)
- Galvanic Alchemist relevance 0.62 · 21.8% (47 of 216 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.54 · 34.3% (74 of 216 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.63 · 18.5% (40 of 216 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.53 · 34.3% (74 of 216 decks)
- Wizard's Rockets relevance 0.68 · 13.0% (28 of 216 decks)
- Tower of Fortunes relevance 0.71 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.45 · 48.6% (105 of 216 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.57 · 25.5% (55 of 216 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.49 · 38.0% (82 of 216 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.57 · 23.6% (51 of 216 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.51 · 31.9% (69 of 216 decks)
- Faerie Formation relevance 0.62 · 13.9% (30 of 216 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.50 · 31.9% (69 of 216 decks)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.65 · 11.1% (24 of 216 decks)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.64 · 11.6% (25 of 216 decks)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.56 · 19.0% (41 of 216 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.48 · 31.0% (67 of 216 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (25 of 216 decks)
- Azure Mage relevance 0.62 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.44 · 36.1% (78 of 216 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.53 · 17.6% (38 of 216 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Prismite relevance 0.69 · 59.3% (128 of 216 decks)
- Stonework Packbeast relevance 0.70 · 56.0% (121 of 216 decks)
- Prophet of Distortion relevance 0.62 · 60.6% (131 of 216 decks)
- Tymora's Invoker relevance 0.83 · 31.5% (68 of 216 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.75 · 34.7% (75 of 216 decks)
- Crossroads Candleguide relevance 0.78 · 27.8% (60 of 216 decks)
- Third Path Savant relevance 0.80 · 22.7% (49 of 216 decks)
- Signpost Scarecrow relevance 0.78 · 24.5% (53 of 216 decks)
- Dimensional Infiltrator relevance 0.65 · 25.5% (55 of 216 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.54 · 44.0% (95 of 216 decks)
- Biomechan Engineer relevance 0.59 · 32.9% (71 of 216 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.53 · 40.7% (88 of 216 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.50 · 44.4% (96 of 216 decks)
- Galvanic Alchemist relevance 0.62 · 21.8% (47 of 216 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.54 · 34.3% (74 of 216 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.45 · 48.6% (105 of 216 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.49 · 38.0% (82 of 216 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.57 · 23.6% (51 of 216 decks)
- Faerie Formation relevance 0.62 · 13.9% (30 of 216 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.50 · 31.9% (69 of 216 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.48 · 31.0% (67 of 216 decks)
- Azure Mage relevance 0.62 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.44 · 36.1% (78 of 216 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.53 · 17.6% (38 of 216 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.58 · 11.6% (25 of 216 decks)
- Colossus of Akros relevance 0.55 · 14.4% (31 of 216 decks)
- Wren's Run Hydra relevance 0.54 · 14.4% (31 of 216 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.49 · 21.8% (47 of 216 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.44 · 19.9% (43 of 216 decks)
- Mystic Archaeologist relevance 0.56 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.47 · 11.6% (25 of 216 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.45 · 13.4% (29 of 216 decks)
- Hypnotic Grifter relevance 0.52 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.27 · 55.6% (120 of 216 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.47 · 7.9% (17 of 216 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 0.42 · 12.0% (26 of 216 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.33 · 28.7% (62 of 216 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.31 · 34.7% (75 of 216 decks)
- Geology Enthusiast relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Shefet Monitor relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 0.45 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.38 · 11.1% (24 of 216 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.39 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (27 of 216 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (27 of 216 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.35 · 15.3% (33 of 216 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.29 · 31.5% (68 of 216 decks)
- Sage of the Beyond relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (15 of 216 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.31 · 20.4% (44 of 216 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (36 of 216 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.81 · 56.9% (123 of 216 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.86 · 45.4% (98 of 216 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.67 · 62.0% (134 of 216 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.77 · 36.6% (79 of 216 decks)
- Gemstone Array relevance 0.74 · 34.3% (74 of 216 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.73 · 34.7% (75 of 216 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.60 · 46.3% (100 of 216 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.73 · 24.5% (53 of 216 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.50 · 49.1% (106 of 216 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.61 · 23.6% (51 of 216 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.63 · 18.5% (40 of 216 decks)
- Wizard's Rockets relevance 0.68 · 13.0% (28 of 216 decks)
- Tower of Fortunes relevance 0.71 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.57 · 25.5% (55 of 216 decks)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.65 · 11.1% (24 of 216 decks)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.64 · 11.6% (25 of 216 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (25 of 216 decks)
- Goblin Cannon relevance 0.58 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.50 · 13.0% (28 of 216 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.43 · 25.5% (55 of 216 decks)
- Vivien's Arkbow relevance 0.56 · 7.9% (17 of 216 decks)
- Kite Shield relevance 0.57 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Swashbuckler's Whip relevance 0.54 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Rod of Absorption relevance 0.53 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.48 · 10.6% (23 of 216 decks)
- Vanguard's Shield relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.37 · 13.9% (30 of 216 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.44 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Mask of Avacyn relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.43 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.41 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 0.45 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Tower of Calamities relevance 0.52 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.38 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.40 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Bronze Cudgels relevance 0.49 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Captain America's Shield relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (18 of 216 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (13 of 216 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.26 · 18.5% (40 of 216 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 45.8% (99 of 216 decks)
- Oracle's Vault relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.35 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
All enchantments (49)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.71 · 47.2% (102 of 216 decks)
- Thassa's Ire relevance 0.78 · 32.9% (71 of 216 decks)
- Singing Bell Strike relevance 0.77 · 26.9% (58 of 216 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.68 · 38.0% (82 of 216 decks)
- Ringing Strike Mastery relevance 0.68 · 27.8% (60 of 216 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.53 · 34.3% (74 of 216 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.51 · 12.0% (26 of 216 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.46 · 18.1% (39 of 216 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (54 of 216 decks)
- Precognition Field relevance 0.50 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.43 · 11.6% (25 of 216 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.33 · 29.2% (63 of 216 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.42 · 9.3% (20 of 216 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.35 · 13.0% (28 of 216 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (15 of 216 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.24 · 17.6% (38 of 216 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.26 · 9.7% (21 of 216 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.27 · 6.9% (15 of 216 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (21 of 216 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (20 of 216 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 12.0% (26 of 216 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (27 of 216 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.11 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shore Up relevance 0.49 · 49.1% (106 of 216 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.51 · 31.9% (69 of 216 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.55 · 11.1% (24 of 216 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (36 of 216 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.44 · 19.4% (42 of 216 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.47 · 13.0% (28 of 216 decks)
- Ornamental Courage relevance 0.53 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.44 · 14.8% (32 of 216 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (17 of 216 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Sudden Spinnerets relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.36 · 13.4% (29 of 216 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.40 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (21 of 216 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.31 · 13.4% (29 of 216 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.33 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.27 · 20.4% (44 of 216 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.28 · 14.8% (32 of 216 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.28 · 14.8% (32 of 216 decks)
- Ride the Avalanche relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.28 · 12.0% (26 of 216 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 0.37 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Steady Aim relevance 0.42 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.27 · 10.6% (23 of 216 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.24 · 14.4% (31 of 216 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.17 · 31.0% (67 of 216 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.22 · 12.0% (26 of 216 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.20 · 15.7% (34 of 216 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.24 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Decree of Savagery relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.17 · 23.1% (50 of 216 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.16 · 28.7% (62 of 216 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.20 · 9.7% (21 of 216 decks)
- Triton Tactics relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
All sorceries (41)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.56 · 19.0% (41 of 216 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.48 · 13.4% (29 of 216 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.43 · 10.6% (23 of 216 decks)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 0.45 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.30 · 22.2% (48 of 216 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.38 · 7.9% (17 of 216 decks)
- Threats Undetected relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Path to the Festival relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.28 · 9.7% (21 of 216 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (36 of 216 decks)
- Deep Reconnaissance relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 26.4% (57 of 216 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 37.0% (80 of 216 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 32.9% (71 of 216 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 22.2% (48 of 216 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 9.7% (21 of 216 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 19.9% (43 of 216 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.15 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (13 of 216 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.10 · 27.8% (60 of 216 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 7.9% (17 of 216 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.41 · 14.8% (32 of 216 decks)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.48 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.35 · 29.6% (64 of 216 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.39 · 15.3% (33 of 216 decks)
- Blighted Cataract relevance 0.41 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Hall of Tagsin relevance 0.42 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.29 · 18.5% (40 of 216 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.36 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (18 of 216 decks)
- Underdark Rift relevance 0.43 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (13 of 216 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.27 · 13.4% (29 of 216 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.29 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.29 · 6.9% (15 of 216 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.29 · 6.9% (15 of 216 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (13 of 216 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 11.1% (24 of 216 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (18 of 216 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (13 of 216 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 42.6% (92 of 216 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (21 of 216 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (15 of 216 decks)
- Kitchen relevance 0.29 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 22.2% (48 of 216 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.18 · 15.3% (33 of 216 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.17 · 19.9% (43 of 216 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.21 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (18 of 216 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (19 of 216 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.16 · 13.4% (29 of 216 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.12 · 26.9% (58 of 216 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.16 · 7.9% (17 of 216 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (24 of 216 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (28 of 216 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (27 of 216 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
All lands (45)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.63 · 42.1% (91 of 216 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.27 · 13.9% (30 of 216 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.17 · 35.2% (76 of 216 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (18 of 216 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.18 · 13.9% (30 of 216 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.14 · 29.6% (64 of 216 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (14 of 216 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 9.7% (21 of 216 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.14 · 15.3% (33 of 216 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (15 of 216 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.16 · 7.4% (16 of 216 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (81 of 216 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (13 of 216 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (10 of 216 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.11 · 36.1% (78 of 216 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (19 of 216 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (27 of 216 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.10 · 42.1% (91 of 216 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.14 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 54.6% (118 of 216 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 18.1% (39 of 216 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (12 of 216 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.11 · 28.7% (62 of 216 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 39.4% (85 of 216 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 41.2% (89 of 216 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.13 · 9.3% (20 of 216 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (18 of 216 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (7 of 216 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (11 of 216 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (6 of 216 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (15 of 216 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 51.9% (112 of 216 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.12 · 3.7% (8 of 216 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (9 of 216 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (5 of 216 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 77.3% (167 of 216 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 89.8% (194 of 216 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 90.7% (196 of 216 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher, from 216 real Commander partner decks.