Nessian Courser
Played in 258 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
41.7% Green
- Green 258 · 41.7%
- Selesnya 222 · 35.9%
- Ink-Treader 53 · 8.6%
- Golgari 23 · 3.7%
- Gruul 20 · 3.2%
- Other (8) 42 · 6.8%
All commanders (7)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 4.78 · 14.5% (219 of 1,506 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.10 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.93 · 2.8% (4 of 145 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.57 · 2.0% (2 of 101 decks)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.38 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.33 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Bounteous Kirin relevance 0.32 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 4.10 · 82.6% (213 of 258 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.98 · 84.5% (218 of 258 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 3.83 · 72.5% (187 of 258 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 3.58 · 59.7% (154 of 258 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 3.55 · 64.3% (166 of 258 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 3.40 · 66.3% (171 of 258 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 3.37 · 67.1% (173 of 258 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.35 · 62.4% (161 of 258 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 3.35 · 54.3% (140 of 258 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 3.24 · 61.2% (158 of 258 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 3.09 · 70.5% (182 of 258 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 3.08 · 46.1% (119 of 258 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 3.03 · 57.8% (149 of 258 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.91 · 52.3% (135 of 258 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.91 · 57.4% (148 of 258 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 2.86 · 43.0% (111 of 258 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.85 · 57.0% (147 of 258 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.83 · 45.3% (117 of 258 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 2.74 · 46.5% (120 of 258 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.70 · 71.7% (185 of 258 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.62 · 72.1% (186 of 258 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 2.62 · 40.7% (105 of 258 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.58 · 48.4% (125 of 258 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.50 · 39.5% (102 of 258 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.45 · 84.9% (219 of 258 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.33 · 62.8% (162 of 258 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.22 · 39.1% (101 of 258 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 2.11 · 60.5% (156 of 258 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.10 · 32.9% (85 of 258 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 2.09 · 32.6% (84 of 258 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 4.10 · 82.6% (213 of 258 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.98 · 84.5% (218 of 258 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 3.83 · 72.5% (187 of 258 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 3.58 · 59.7% (154 of 258 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 3.55 · 64.3% (166 of 258 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 3.40 · 66.3% (171 of 258 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 3.37 · 67.1% (173 of 258 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.35 · 62.4% (161 of 258 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 3.35 · 54.3% (140 of 258 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 3.24 · 61.2% (158 of 258 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 3.08 · 46.1% (119 of 258 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 3.03 · 57.8% (149 of 258 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.91 · 52.3% (135 of 258 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.91 · 57.4% (148 of 258 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 2.86 · 43.0% (111 of 258 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.85 · 57.0% (147 of 258 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.83 · 45.3% (117 of 258 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 2.74 · 46.5% (120 of 258 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.70 · 71.7% (185 of 258 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.62 · 72.1% (186 of 258 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 2.62 · 40.7% (105 of 258 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.58 · 48.4% (125 of 258 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.50 · 39.5% (102 of 258 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.45 · 84.9% (219 of 258 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.33 · 62.8% (162 of 258 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.22 · 39.1% (101 of 258 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 2.11 · 60.5% (156 of 258 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.10 · 32.9% (85 of 258 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 2.09 · 32.6% (84 of 258 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.06 · 61.2% (158 of 258 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 2.04 · 32.6% (84 of 258 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 2.04 · 32.9% (85 of 258 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.78 · 27.1% (70 of 258 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.63 · 24.8% (64 of 258 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.55 · 42.2% (109 of 258 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 1.46 · 41.5% (107 of 258 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.33 · 21.7% (56 of 258 decks)
- Spined Wurm relevance 1.12 · 16.7% (43 of 258 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.85 · 22.9% (59 of 258 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 0.84 · 13.2% (34 of 258 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 1.07 · 20.5% (53 of 258 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.89 · 25.6% (66 of 258 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 3.09 · 70.5% (182 of 258 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.70 · 38.0% (98 of 258 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 1.29 · 53.1% (137 of 258 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.10 · 35.7% (92 of 258 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.85 · 37.2% (96 of 258 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 1.20 · 26.4% (68 of 258 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.95 · 41.1% (106 of 258 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.87 · 34.1% (88 of 258 decks)
EDH data for Nessian Courser: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 258 real decks.