Time Warp
Played in 929 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
830+6+1+4+14+12+8+5+
That's every commander.
All commanders (8)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 1.33 · 2.0% (55 of 2,815 decks)
- Nashi, Illusion Gadgeteer relevance 1.20 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 1.14 · 1.5% (47 of 3,039 decks)
- Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff relevance 1.11 · 1.5% (44 of 2,903 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.98 · 1.6% (26 of 1,665 decks)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.54 · 1.6% (5 of 305 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.35 · 1.8% (2 of 111 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.72 · 29.4% (273 of 929 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.11 · 17.0% (158 of 929 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.79 · 43.3% (402 of 929 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.74 · 38.2% (355 of 929 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.74 · 26.0% (242 of 929 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.66 · 28.7% (267 of 929 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.65 · 29.5% (274 of 929 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.65 · 36.5% (339 of 929 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.65 · 12.1% (112 of 929 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.64 · 22.2% (206 of 929 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.62 · 31.6% (294 of 929 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.59 · 44.8% (416 of 929 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.58 · 33.4% (310 of 929 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (135 of 929 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.55 · 35.5% (330 of 929 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.54 · 29.7% (276 of 929 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.53 · 22.2% (206 of 929 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.53 · 26.8% (249 of 929 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.53 · 8.4% (78 of 929 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.51 · 19.3% (179 of 929 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.50 · 25.5% (237 of 929 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (75 of 929 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.48 · 24.9% (231 of 929 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.48 · 21.3% (198 of 929 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.47 · 17.8% (165 of 929 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (71 of 929 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (157 of 929 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.44 · 18.9% (176 of 929 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.42 · 32.8% (305 of 929 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.42 · 14.5% (135 of 929 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.59 · 44.8% (416 of 929 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.55 · 35.5% (330 of 929 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.48 · 21.3% (198 of 929 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.44 · 18.9% (176 of 929 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.41 · 23.3% (216 of 929 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.41 · 16.4% (152 of 929 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.47 · 17.8% (165 of 929 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.65 · 36.5% (339 of 929 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.53 · 22.2% (206 of 929 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.53 · 26.8% (249 of 929 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (157 of 929 decks)
All instants (14)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.79 · 43.3% (402 of 929 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.74 · 26.0% (242 of 929 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.66 · 28.7% (267 of 929 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.65 · 29.5% (274 of 929 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.65 · 12.1% (112 of 929 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.62 · 31.6% (294 of 929 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.58 · 33.4% (310 of 929 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.51 · 19.3% (179 of 929 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.50 · 25.5% (237 of 929 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.48 · 24.9% (231 of 929 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.42 · 14.5% (135 of 929 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.41 · 28.2% (262 of 929 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.40 · 16.0% (149 of 929 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.40 · 18.7% (174 of 929 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.72 · 29.4% (273 of 929 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.11 · 17.0% (158 of 929 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.74 · 38.2% (355 of 929 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.64 · 22.2% (206 of 929 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (135 of 929 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.54 · 29.7% (276 of 929 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.53 · 8.4% (78 of 929 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (75 of 929 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (71 of 929 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.42 · 32.8% (305 of 929 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.41 · 28.1% (261 of 929 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.41 · 27.9% (259 of 929 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.50 · 31.3% (291 of 929 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.48 · 25.3% (235 of 929 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.48 · 27.0% (251 of 929 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.46 · 25.2% (234 of 929 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.46 · 14.7% (137 of 929 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.44 · 22.8% (212 of 929 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (105 of 929 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.41 · 21.5% (200 of 929 decks)
All lands (5)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.50 · 20.5% (190 of 929 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.49 · 20.8% (193 of 929 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.47 · 18.4% (171 of 929 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.41 · 13.6% (126 of 929 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (127 of 929 decks)
EDH data for Time Warp: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 929 real decks.



























































