Sage of the Maze
Played in 5,690 Simic decks
2424+12+2+3+1+6+15+11+
Color Identity Spread
40.7% Simic
-
Simic 5,690 · 40.7%
-
Five-Color 3,455 · 24.7%
-
Sultai 2,485 · 17.8%
-
Golgari 349 · 2.5%
-
Naya 280 · 2.0%
- Other (16) 1,723 · 12.3%
Commanders
Omo, Queen of Vesuva 70.5% of decks
Omo, Queen of Vesuva 70.5% of decks
Gretchen Titchwillow 10.3% of decks
Gretchen Titchwillow 10.3% of decks
Inga and Esika 2.9% of decks
Inga and Esika 2.9% of decks
Dungeon Delver // Wilson, Refined Grizzly 11.5% of decks
Dungeon Delver // Wilson, Refined Grizzly 11.5% of decks
Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Numa, Joraga Chieftain 50.0% of decks
Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Numa, Joraga Chieftain 50.0% of decks
Experiment Kraj 2.2% of decks
Experiment Kraj 2.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Magus of the Candelabra 70.2% of decks
Magus of the Candelabra 70.2% of decks
Hour of Promise 70.2% of decks
Hour of Promise 70.2% of decks
Copy Land 63.4% of decks
Copy Land 63.4% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 74.7% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 74.7% of decks
Expedition Map 67.8% of decks
Expedition Map 67.8% of decks
March from Velis Vel 53.8% of decks
March from Velis Vel 53.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (24)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 5.41 · 70.5% (5,012 of 7,108 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 1.45 · 10.3% (112 of 1,087 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (22 of 766 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.45 · 11.5% (3 of 26 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.40 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.34 · 2.2% (17 of 771 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.27 · 1.2% (39 of 3,198 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (3 of 101 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.20 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 0.19 · 1.2% (13 of 1,098 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.19 · 1.1% (14 of 1,221 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.18 · 1.4% (8 of 588 decks)
- Alaundo the Seer relevance 0.18 · 1.0% (15 of 1,472 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.16 · 1.1% (10 of 948 decks)
- Tishana, Voice of Thunder relevance 0.13 · 1.3% (4 of 307 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.12 · 1.2% (4 of 329 decks)
- Venus, Torn Between Worlds relevance 0.12 · 1.4% (3 of 214 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.09 · 1.4% (2 of 145 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.09 · 1.3% (2 of 154 decks)
- Nael, Avizoa Aeronaut relevance 0.07 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Guru Pathik relevance 0.05 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.05 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (24)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 2.60 · 70.2% (3,994 of 5,690 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.57 · 70.2% (3,994 of 5,690 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 2.45 · 63.4% (3,610 of 5,690 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 2.35 · 74.7% (4,251 of 5,690 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 2.24 · 67.8% (3,856 of 5,690 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 2.22 · 53.8% (3,059 of 5,690 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 2.19 · 61.7% (3,511 of 5,690 decks)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 1.99 · 49.9% (2,842 of 5,690 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 1.98 · 61.6% (3,504 of 5,690 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 1.81 · 55.2% (3,140 of 5,690 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.79 · 69.6% (3,963 of 5,690 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.79 · 66.1% (3,761 of 5,690 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.69 · 37.0% (2,108 of 5,690 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 1.68 · 39.5% (2,249 of 5,690 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 1.64 · 51.8% (2,948 of 5,690 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 1.61 · 57.1% (3,251 of 5,690 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 1.60 · 41.0% (2,334 of 5,690 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 1.57 · 35.7% (2,029 of 5,690 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.52 · 57.8% (3,288 of 5,690 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 1.51 · 42.3% (2,407 of 5,690 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 1.44 · 34.4% (1,958 of 5,690 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.37 · 66.9% (3,808 of 5,690 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 1.34 · 36.5% (2,076 of 5,690 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.31 · 49.8% (2,832 of 5,690 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 2.60 · 70.2% (3,994 of 5,690 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 2.19 · 61.7% (3,511 of 5,690 decks)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 1.99 · 49.9% (2,842 of 5,690 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.79 · 69.6% (3,963 of 5,690 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 1.68 · 39.5% (2,249 of 5,690 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 1.60 · 41.0% (2,334 of 5,690 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 1.57 · 35.7% (2,029 of 5,690 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.52 · 57.8% (3,288 of 5,690 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 1.51 · 42.3% (2,407 of 5,690 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 1.44 · 34.4% (1,958 of 5,690 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.37 · 66.9% (3,808 of 5,690 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.31 · 49.8% (2,832 of 5,690 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Expedition Map relevance 2.24 · 67.8% (3,856 of 5,690 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 1.61 · 57.1% (3,251 of 5,690 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Copy Land relevance 2.45 · 63.4% (3,610 of 5,690 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 1.98 · 61.6% (3,504 of 5,690 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.69 · 37.0% (2,108 of 5,690 decks)
All instants (1)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 1.64 · 51.8% (2,948 of 5,690 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.57 · 70.2% (3,994 of 5,690 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 2.35 · 74.7% (4,251 of 5,690 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 2.22 · 53.8% (3,059 of 5,690 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 1.81 · 55.2% (3,140 of 5,690 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.79 · 66.1% (3,761 of 5,690 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 1.34 · 36.5% (2,076 of 5,690 decks)
All utility lands (15)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 2.82 · 78.7% (4,479 of 5,690 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 2.45 · 62.8% (3,576 of 5,690 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 2.45 · 83.5% (4,751 of 5,690 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 2.29 · 66.6% (3,791 of 5,690 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 2.16 · 53.6% (3,048 of 5,690 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 2.13 · 74.6% (4,243 of 5,690 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 2.08 · 53.4% (3,038 of 5,690 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 1.87 · 46.3% (2,633 of 5,690 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 1.83 · 52.4% (2,980 of 5,690 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 1.68 · 39.8% (2,266 of 5,690 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.64 · 38.7% (2,200 of 5,690 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 1.50 · 37.5% (2,134 of 5,690 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.35 · 31.7% (1,805 of 5,690 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 1.31 · 32.9% (1,872 of 5,690 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 1.30 · 32.0% (1,822 of 5,690 decks)
All lands (11)
- Cloudpost relevance 3.04 · 87.1% (4,954 of 5,690 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 2.83 · 79.8% (4,541 of 5,690 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 2.81 · 87.3% (4,968 of 5,690 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 2.78 · 85.8% (4,880 of 5,690 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 2.78 · 85.8% (4,881 of 5,690 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 2.68 · 71.7% (4,078 of 5,690 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 2.59 · 83.1% (4,731 of 5,690 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 2.22 · 74.7% (4,248 of 5,690 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 2.06 · 53.4% (3,038 of 5,690 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 1.68 · 63.9% (3,634 of 5,690 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 1.31 · 40.1% (2,280 of 5,690 decks)
EDH data for Sage of the Maze: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,690 real decks.

































































