Cataclysm
Played in 314 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
526+9+2+4+2+9+18+6+
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.73 · 2.6% (113 of 4,337 decks)
- Jo Grant // The Fugitive Doctor relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.56 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
- Keleth, Sunmane Familiar // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.30 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.30 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Armageddon relevance 2.64 · 55.7% (175 of 314 decks)
- Catastrophe relevance 1.97 · 30.9% (97 of 314 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 1.88 · 28.7% (90 of 314 decks)
- Ravages of War relevance 1.77 · 28.7% (90 of 314 decks)
- Impending Disaster relevance 1.73 · 25.8% (81 of 314 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.35 · 34.1% (107 of 314 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.34 · 42.0% (132 of 314 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.34 · 37.6% (118 of 314 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.31 · 33.8% (106 of 314 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.31 · 40.4% (127 of 314 decks)
- Jokulhaups relevance 1.25 · 18.5% (58 of 314 decks)
- Ruination relevance 1.25 · 18.8% (59 of 314 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.20 · 32.2% (101 of 314 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.15 · 34.4% (108 of 314 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.09 · 34.7% (109 of 314 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.08 · 27.7% (87 of 314 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.08 · 26.1% (82 of 314 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 28.3% (89 of 314 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.00 · 22.3% (70 of 314 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.00 · 30.6% (96 of 314 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.99 · 39.8% (125 of 314 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 0.97 · 26.1% (82 of 314 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 0.96 · 14.6% (46 of 314 decks)
- Fall of the Thran relevance 0.95 · 15.3% (48 of 314 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.95 · 26.4% (83 of 314 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 0.94 · 21.0% (66 of 314 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.34 · 42.0% (132 of 314 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.34 · 37.6% (118 of 314 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.31 · 40.4% (127 of 314 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.15 · 34.4% (108 of 314 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.08 · 26.1% (82 of 314 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.00 · 30.6% (96 of 314 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 0.97 · 26.1% (82 of 314 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.95 · 26.4% (83 of 314 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 0.94 · 21.0% (66 of 314 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.31 · 33.8% (106 of 314 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 28.3% (89 of 314 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Impending Disaster relevance 1.73 · 25.8% (81 of 314 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.20 · 32.2% (101 of 314 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.09 · 34.7% (109 of 314 decks)
- Fall of the Thran relevance 0.95 · 15.3% (48 of 314 decks)
All instants (2)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.00 · 22.3% (70 of 314 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.99 · 39.8% (125 of 314 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Armageddon relevance 2.64 · 55.7% (175 of 314 decks)
- Catastrophe relevance 1.97 · 30.9% (97 of 314 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 1.88 · 28.7% (90 of 314 decks)
- Ravages of War relevance 1.77 · 28.7% (90 of 314 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.35 · 34.1% (107 of 314 decks)
- Jokulhaups relevance 1.25 · 18.5% (58 of 314 decks)
- Ruination relevance 1.25 · 18.8% (59 of 314 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.08 · 27.7% (87 of 314 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 0.96 · 14.6% (46 of 314 decks)
All utility lands (18)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.48 · 43.3% (136 of 314 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.47 · 43.0% (135 of 314 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.46 · 43.0% (135 of 314 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.45 · 42.7% (134 of 314 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.42 · 42.0% (132 of 314 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.39 · 39.8% (125 of 314 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.37 · 40.4% (127 of 314 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.25 · 36.0% (113 of 314 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.24 · 33.8% (106 of 314 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.22 · 35.4% (111 of 314 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 1.20 · 29.0% (91 of 314 decks)
- Desert relevance 1.18 · 29.9% (94 of 314 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 1.17 · 29.0% (91 of 314 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 1.12 · 27.1% (85 of 314 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.11 · 30.6% (96 of 314 decks)
- Cradle of the Accursed relevance 1.04 · 24.2% (76 of 314 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.98 · 25.5% (80 of 314 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.94 · 42.0% (132 of 314 decks)
All lands (6)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.33 · 42.0% (132 of 314 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.32 · 41.7% (131 of 314 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.26 · 39.8% (125 of 314 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.24 · 33.8% (106 of 314 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.24 · 32.5% (102 of 314 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.21 · 34.4% (108 of 314 decks)
EDH data for Cataclysm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 314 real decks.


























































