Expropriate
Played in 4,994 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Yue, the Moon Spirit relevance 2.70 · 33.2% (303 of 914 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.60 · 17.1% (1,300 of 7,581 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 2.52 · 32.7% (211 of 645 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 2.23 · 25.7% (178 of 692 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 2.18 · 22.4% (211 of 941 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias // The Great Synthesis relevance 1.81 · 13.2% (274 of 2,070 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 1.65 · 18.6% (81 of 436 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 1.53 · 14.6% (93 of 635 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 1.47 · 12.8% (102 of 794 decks)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 1.35 · 16.4% (43 of 262 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.18 · 15.3% (30 of 196 decks)
- Kang the Conqueror relevance 1.05 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Braids, Conjurer Adept relevance 1.02 · 5.8% (144 of 2,495 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.95 · 8.0% (46 of 575 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 0.93 · 7.6% (47 of 619 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.91 · 6.1% (75 of 1,238 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 0.90 · 6.9% (52 of 756 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.89 · 8.9% (29 of 327 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.77 · 8.0% (21 of 263 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.76 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.74 · 8.6% (17 of 198 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.74 · 7.1% (24 of 339 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.74 · 10.6% (12 of 113 decks)
- Errant, Street Artist relevance 0.69 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
- Mathise, Surge Channeler relevance 0.66 · 5.7% (25 of 439 decks)
- Ironheart, Clever Champion relevance 0.61 · 5.1% (24 of 475 decks)
- Bilbo, Thief in the Night relevance 0.58 · 3.6% (45 of 1,240 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.57 · 2.2% (254 of 11,788 decks)
- Uyo, Silent Prophet relevance 0.56 · 8.5% (8 of 94 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.56 · 3.4% (45 of 1,321 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Time Stretch relevance 1.26 · 36.6% (1,828 of 4,994 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.13 · 37.2% (1,859 of 4,994 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 1.04 · 34.5% (1,722 of 4,994 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.96 · 28.2% (1,407 of 4,994 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.84 · 22.4% (1,119 of 4,994 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.80 · 31.4% (1,569 of 4,994 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.78 · 19.4% (970 of 4,994 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.76 · 19.5% (972 of 4,994 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.76 · 23.6% (1,180 of 4,994 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.71 · 50.3% (2,512 of 4,994 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.71 · 56.6% (2,829 of 4,994 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (923 of 4,994 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.68 · 41.2% (2,058 of 4,994 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.68 · 24.0% (1,197 of 4,994 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.67 · 44.8% (2,238 of 4,994 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.65 · 51.2% (2,558 of 4,994 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.61 · 39.3% (1,964 of 4,994 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.61 · 21.7% (1,083 of 4,994 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (928 of 4,994 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.60 · 14.6% (729 of 4,994 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.60 · 28.0% (1,396 of 4,994 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.59 · 28.3% (1,411 of 4,994 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (847 of 4,994 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.59 · 31.9% (1,594 of 4,994 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.58 · 24.6% (1,230 of 4,994 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.57 · 19.9% (995 of 4,994 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.57 · 20.7% (1,033 of 4,994 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.57 · 31.5% (1,574 of 4,994 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.57 · 33.8% (1,686 of 4,994 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (724 of 4,994 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.68 · 24.0% (1,197 of 4,994 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.67 · 44.8% (2,238 of 4,994 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (928 of 4,994 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.57 · 33.8% (1,686 of 4,994 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.57 · 23.8% (1,190 of 4,994 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.54 · 22.8% (1,139 of 4,994 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.52 · 23.7% (1,182 of 4,994 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.49 · 22.0% (1,099 of 4,994 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Omniscience relevance 0.80 · 31.4% (1,569 of 4,994 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.65 · 51.2% (2,558 of 4,994 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.57 · 20.7% (1,033 of 4,994 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (724 of 4,994 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.54 · 39.4% (1,969 of 4,994 decks)
All instants (18)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.13 · 37.2% (1,859 of 4,994 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.71 · 50.3% (2,512 of 4,994 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.71 · 56.6% (2,829 of 4,994 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.68 · 41.2% (2,058 of 4,994 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.61 · 39.3% (1,964 of 4,994 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.60 · 28.0% (1,396 of 4,994 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.59 · 28.3% (1,411 of 4,994 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.59 · 31.9% (1,594 of 4,994 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.58 · 24.6% (1,230 of 4,994 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.57 · 19.9% (995 of 4,994 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.57 · 31.5% (1,574 of 4,994 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.56 · 30.1% (1,502 of 4,994 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.53 · 24.3% (1,213 of 4,994 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.52 · 23.5% (1,174 of 4,994 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.52 · 40.3% (2,013 of 4,994 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.49 · 18.9% (946 of 4,994 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.48 · 18.6% (928 of 4,994 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.48 · 19.5% (976 of 4,994 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Time Stretch relevance 1.26 · 36.6% (1,828 of 4,994 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 1.04 · 34.5% (1,722 of 4,994 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.96 · 28.2% (1,407 of 4,994 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.84 · 22.4% (1,119 of 4,994 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.78 · 19.4% (970 of 4,994 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.76 · 19.5% (972 of 4,994 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.76 · 23.6% (1,180 of 4,994 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (923 of 4,994 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.61 · 21.7% (1,083 of 4,994 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.60 · 14.6% (729 of 4,994 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (847 of 4,994 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.56 · 12.7% (636 of 4,994 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.55 · 13.9% (695 of 4,994 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (661 of 4,994 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (1,155 of 4,994 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.71 · 36.6% (1,830 of 4,994 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.54 · 38.2% (1,909 of 4,994 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.51 · 35.4% (1,768 of 4,994 decks)
All lands (1)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.47 · 24.7% (1,233 of 4,994 decks)
EDH data for Expropriate: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,994 real decks.