Natural Reclamation
Played in 508 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
3.6% Green
All commanders (30)
- Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 2.86 · 10.8% (56 of 517 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.17 · 12.1% (4 of 33 decks)
- Graham O'Brien relevance 1.04 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.97 · 1.5% (14 of 953 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.91 · 1.1% (18 of 1,650 decks)
- Susan Foreman relevance 0.90 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.85 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.84 · 4.0% (4 of 101 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.82 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.69 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.60 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.59 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.57 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.57 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Varis, Silverymoon Ranger relevance 0.56 · 1.4% (4 of 290 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.50 · 1.5% (3 of 196 decks)
- Master Chef // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.49 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.48 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Master Chef relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Mitotic Ultimus relevance 0.46 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.44 · 1.1% (3 of 261 decks)
- Galion, Elvenking's Butler relevance 0.44 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Martial Mentor relevance 0.41 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Melira, Sylvok Outcast relevance 0.40 · 1.6% (2 of 127 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.40 · 1.6% (2 of 128 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Beorn, Reluctant Host // Till and Tend relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.28 · 29.9% (152 of 508 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.90 · 15.4% (78 of 508 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.88 · 14.4% (73 of 508 decks)
- Walk with the Ancestors relevance 0.77 · 12.2% (62 of 508 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.76 · 31.7% (161 of 508 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.67 · 13.0% (66 of 508 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.65 · 12.2% (62 of 508 decks)
- Terramorph relevance 0.65 · 12.0% (61 of 508 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.64 · 10.6% (54 of 508 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.64 · 14.2% (72 of 508 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.61 · 14.0% (71 of 508 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.61 · 18.7% (95 of 508 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.59 · 15.2% (77 of 508 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (67 of 508 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.57 · 16.1% (82 of 508 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.54 · 17.9% (91 of 508 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.54 · 12.2% (62 of 508 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.47 · 19.5% (99 of 508 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (48 of 508 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.45 · 25.2% (128 of 508 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (61 of 508 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.43 · 9.8% (50 of 508 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (66 of 508 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.42 · 11.8% (60 of 508 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.41 · 27.6% (140 of 508 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.41 · 10.6% (54 of 508 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.41 · 24.6% (125 of 508 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (107 of 508 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (75 of 508 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.37 · 16.1% (82 of 508 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.28 · 29.9% (152 of 508 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.90 · 15.4% (78 of 508 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.88 · 14.4% (73 of 508 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.76 · 31.7% (161 of 508 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.47 · 19.5% (99 of 508 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (48 of 508 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (61 of 508 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.42 · 11.8% (60 of 508 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (107 of 508 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.40 · 14.8% (75 of 508 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.36 · 14.2% (72 of 508 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.36 · 8.9% (45 of 508 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.35 · 8.7% (44 of 508 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (43 of 508 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (60 of 508 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (49 of 508 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (43 of 508 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.34 · 11.8% (60 of 508 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (47 of 508 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.34 · 12.8% (65 of 508 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.67 · 13.0% (66 of 508 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.57 · 16.1% (82 of 508 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (66 of 508 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.37 · 16.1% (82 of 508 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.35 · 11.2% (57 of 508 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.34 · 10.8% (55 of 508 decks)
All instants (2)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.41 · 10.6% (54 of 508 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (43 of 508 decks)
All sorceries (17)
- Walk with the Ancestors relevance 0.77 · 12.2% (62 of 508 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.65 · 12.2% (62 of 508 decks)
- Terramorph relevance 0.65 · 12.0% (61 of 508 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.64 · 10.6% (54 of 508 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.64 · 14.2% (72 of 508 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.61 · 14.0% (71 of 508 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.61 · 18.7% (95 of 508 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.59 · 15.2% (77 of 508 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (67 of 508 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.54 · 17.9% (91 of 508 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.45 · 25.2% (128 of 508 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.43 · 9.8% (50 of 508 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.41 · 27.6% (140 of 508 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.41 · 24.6% (125 of 508 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.36 · 9.4% (48 of 508 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.36 · 11.0% (56 of 508 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.35 · 6.9% (35 of 508 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.54 · 12.2% (62 of 508 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.59 · 15.0% (76 of 508 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.39 · 29.9% (152 of 508 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.38 · 16.1% (82 of 508 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (45 of 508 decks)
EDH data for Natural Reclamation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 508 real decks.