Aggressive Biomancy
Played in 8,445 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
69.4% Simic
- Simic 8,445 · 69.4%
- Sultai 1,655 · 13.6%
- Temur 907 · 7.5%
- Five-Color 534 · 4.4%
- Bant 453 · 3.7%
- Other (10) 178 · 1.5%
All commanders (30)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 4.04 · 48.4% (3,435 of 7,095 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 1.94 · 21.0% (230 of 1,094 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 1.64 · 11.2% (539 of 4,824 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 1.46 · 12.1% (215 of 1,771 decks)
- Moritte of the Frost relevance 1.36 · 14.3% (97 of 676 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 1.31 · 19.8% (43 of 217 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.29 · 11.3% (137 of 1,215 decks)
- It Came from Planet Glurg relevance 1.25 · 23.0% (28 of 122 decks)
- Kimahri, Valiant Guardian relevance 1.19 · 12.0% (80 of 664 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 1.06 · 11.4% (54 of 473 decks)
- Zimone, Infinite Analyst relevance 1.05 · 5.0% (733 of 14,774 decks)
- Volo, Guide to Monsters relevance 1.03 · 5.9% (325 of 5,521 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 1.00 · 6.8% (164 of 2,400 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.94 · 6.7% (131 of 1,961 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.83 · 6.6% (77 of 1,174 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.81 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.77 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Tam, Mindful First-Year relevance 0.72 · 5.8% (58 of 993 decks)
- Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief relevance 0.69 · 4.1% (135 of 3,283 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.65 · 21.7% (5 of 23 decks)
- Nicanzil, Current Conductor relevance 0.63 · 6.0% (33 of 553 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.61 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.56 · 5.9% (22 of 375 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.52 · 10.4% (7 of 67 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (114 of 3,911 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Clan Crafter relevance 0.51 · 5.5% (19 of 343 decks)
- Rikala, Homarid King relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (18 of 329 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.50 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Gor Muldrak, Amphinologist relevance 0.46 · 3.3% (46 of 1,380 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (7 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (25)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.37 · 37.1% (3,132 of 8,445 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.34 · 34.8% (2,943 of 8,445 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 1.31 · 35.4% (2,990 of 8,445 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.30 · 35.5% (2,994 of 8,445 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.27 · 35.8% (3,023 of 8,445 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 1.26 · 30.6% (2,581 of 8,445 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.23 · 45.6% (3,850 of 8,445 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 1.22 · 37.8% (3,189 of 8,445 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.21 · 38.4% (3,242 of 8,445 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.13 · 34.2% (2,887 of 8,445 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 1.11 · 35.1% (2,965 of 8,445 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 1.07 · 27.6% (2,330 of 8,445 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 1.03 · 39.1% (3,300 of 8,445 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 1.03 · 28.2% (2,384 of 8,445 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 0.99 · 23.3% (1,970 of 8,445 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.99 · 49.4% (4,176 of 8,445 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.98 · 37.3% (3,148 of 8,445 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 38.1% (3,219 of 8,445 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.97 · 21.3% (1,800 of 8,445 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.96 · 34.0% (2,873 of 8,445 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.94 · 46.0% (3,884 of 8,445 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.89 · 44.9% (3,789 of 8,445 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.88 · 33.5% (2,832 of 8,445 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.84 · 20.1% (1,699 of 8,445 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.82 · 28.1% (2,374 of 8,445 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.37 · 37.1% (3,132 of 8,445 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 1.31 · 35.4% (2,990 of 8,445 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.27 · 35.8% (3,023 of 8,445 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 1.07 · 27.6% (2,330 of 8,445 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 0.99 · 23.3% (1,970 of 8,445 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.99 · 49.4% (4,176 of 8,445 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.98 · 37.3% (3,148 of 8,445 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 38.1% (3,219 of 8,445 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.94 · 46.0% (3,884 of 8,445 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.84 · 20.1% (1,699 of 8,445 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.82 · 28.1% (2,374 of 8,445 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.13 · 34.2% (2,887 of 8,445 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.96 · 34.0% (2,873 of 8,445 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Copy Land relevance 1.34 · 34.8% (2,943 of 8,445 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 1.22 · 37.8% (3,189 of 8,445 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.97 · 21.3% (1,800 of 8,445 decks)
All instants (1)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 1.11 · 35.1% (2,965 of 8,445 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.30 · 35.5% (2,994 of 8,445 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 1.26 · 30.6% (2,581 of 8,445 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.23 · 45.6% (3,850 of 8,445 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.21 · 38.4% (3,242 of 8,445 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 1.03 · 39.1% (3,300 of 8,445 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 1.03 · 28.2% (2,384 of 8,445 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.89 · 44.9% (3,789 of 8,445 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.88 · 33.5% (2,832 of 8,445 decks)
All utility lands (15)
- Trenchpost relevance 1.33 · 34.2% (2,888 of 8,445 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 1.32 · 37.0% (3,122 of 8,445 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.26 · 42.9% (3,624 of 8,445 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.24 · 30.7% (2,595 of 8,445 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 1.22 · 35.5% (3,002 of 8,445 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 1.15 · 28.6% (2,415 of 8,445 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 1.15 · 33.0% (2,785 of 8,445 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.08 · 37.9% (3,201 of 8,445 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 1.02 · 24.3% (2,053 of 8,445 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.97 · 22.8% (1,927 of 8,445 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.92 · 23.0% (1,942 of 8,445 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (2,332 of 8,445 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.83 · 20.4% (1,722 of 8,445 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.82 · 20.7% (1,747 of 8,445 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.82 · 19.3% (1,634 of 8,445 decks)
All lands (10)
- Cloudpost relevance 1.44 · 41.2% (3,478 of 8,445 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.39 · 39.1% (3,302 of 8,445 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 1.37 · 36.7% (3,099 of 8,445 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 1.35 · 42.0% (3,545 of 8,445 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 1.35 · 41.6% (3,511 of 8,445 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 1.35 · 41.5% (3,508 of 8,445 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.31 · 42.2% (3,562 of 8,445 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.17 · 39.4% (3,329 of 8,445 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.91 · 34.9% (2,945 of 8,445 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.87 · 26.7% (2,254 of 8,445 decks)
EDH data for Aggressive Biomancy: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 8,445 real decks.