Cards like Snake Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Snake Umbra 61%
- Curiosity 60%
- Keen Sense 41%
- Ophidian Eye 2%
Cards like Stormchaser Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eel Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Eel Umbra 44%
- Lion Umbra 37%
- Spider Umbra 22%
- Boar Umbra 20%
Cards like Combat Research
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Combat Research 65%
- Sixth Sense 33%
- Curious Obsession 12%
Cards like Tyvar's Stand
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Tyvar's Stand 39%
- Snakeskin Veil 38%
- Overprotect 16%
- Blossoming Defense 11%
- Ranger's Guile 2%
Other options: Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Setessan Champion
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sea-Dasher Octopus
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Edric, Spymaster of Trest, Thieving Otter, Vedalken Heretic, Thieving Magpie, Nimble Brigand, Broodbirth Viper, Illvoi Infiltrator, Neurok Commando, Soulknife Spy, Lu Xun, Scholar General, Saltwater Stalwart, Nine-Tail White Fox, Scroll Thief, Gateway Sneak, Stealer of Secrets, Marchesa's Infiltrator, Jhessian Thief
Cards like Slip Through Space
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Tamiyo's Safekeeping
8.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Quasiduplicate
8.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Quasiduplicate 21%
- Cackling Counterpart 15%
- Repudiate // Replicate 15%
- Fated Infatuation 5%
- Rally the Galadhrim 4%
- Echocasting Symposium 3%
- See Double 2%
- Spitting Image 1%
Other options: Self-Reflection
Cards like Rune of Might
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 47%
- Elvish Mystic 35%
- Fyndhorn Elves 20%
- Gyre Engineer 1%
Other options: Orochi Merge-Keeper, Boreal Druid, Druid of the Cowl, Rootrider Faun, Goobbue Gardener, Golden Hind, Fyndhorn Elder, Wirewood Elf, Leaf Gilder, Nantuko Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Woodland Mystic, Orochi Sustainer, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
9.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Glowstone Recluse
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rancor
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like One with Nature
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Birds of Paradise
6.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Birds of Paradise 39%
- Maraleaf Pixie 27%
Cards like Alpha Authority
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Alpha Authority 32%
- Canopy Cover 14%
Cards like Cartouche of Knowledge
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Future Flight, Astral Wingspan, Stratus Walk, Lofty Dreams
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 46%
- Negate 27%
- Wash Away 2%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Minor Misstep, Intervene, Wild Unraveling, Envelop, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Preemptive Strike, Nullify, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Wild Growth
3.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 20%
- Fertile Ground 6%
- Overgrowth 1%
Other options: Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Shore Up
5.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shore Up 17%
- Magic Damper 4%
- Dive Down 2%
- Octopus Form 2%
- Mizzium Skin 1%
Other options: Glint, Chase Inspiration, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield
Cards like Invisible Stalker
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Hydra's Growth
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Gaea's Gift
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ancestral Mask
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cerulean Wisps 17%
- Refocus 2%
Cards like Aqueous Form
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 54%
- Security Bypass 2%
Cards like Pongify
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 22%
- Rapid Hybridization 20%
All top picks (50)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.91 · 76.8% (2,463 of 3,206 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.85 · 68.9% (2,209 of 3,206 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.90 · 62.9% (2,016 of 3,206 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.86 · 64.9% (2,080 of 3,206 decks)
- Spellwild Ouphe relevance 0.94 · 53.0% (1,699 of 3,206 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.86 · 61.2% (1,962 of 3,206 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.85 · 61.7% (1,979 of 3,206 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 0.87 · 58.5% (1,874 of 3,206 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 0.87 · 55.4% (1,776 of 3,206 decks)
- Triton Fortune Hunter relevance 0.94 · 47.8% (1,534 of 3,206 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.83 · 59.7% (1,915 of 3,206 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.72 · 69.7% (2,234 of 3,206 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.91 · 45.0% (1,444 of 3,206 decks)
- Pouncing Shoreshark relevance 0.90 · 45.8% (1,468 of 3,206 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.95 · 41.1% (1,319 of 3,206 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.81 · 55.7% (1,785 of 3,206 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.89 · 45.1% (1,447 of 3,206 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.81 · 53.7% (1,723 of 3,206 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.92 · 41.4% (1,326 of 3,206 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.88 · 44.0% (1,411 of 3,206 decks)
- Sawtusk Demolisher relevance 0.90 · 42.4% (1,358 of 3,206 decks)
- Dreamtail Heron relevance 0.90 · 42.0% (1,347 of 3,206 decks)
- Glowstone Recluse relevance 0.93 · 36.1% (1,158 of 3,206 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.80 · 51.1% (1,638 of 3,206 decks)
- Parcelbeast relevance 0.86 · 43.1% (1,383 of 3,206 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.86 · 43.4% (1,392 of 3,206 decks)
- Auspicious Starrix relevance 0.89 · 38.4% (1,230 of 3,206 decks)
- Timber Paladin relevance 0.97 · 28.6% (918 of 3,206 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.94 · 31.4% (1,008 of 3,206 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.92 · 32.9% (1,054 of 3,206 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.95 · 30.0% (961 of 3,206 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.96 · 29.3% (939 of 3,206 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.92 · 33.5% (1,074 of 3,206 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.88 · 36.6% (1,173 of 3,206 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.78 · 48.1% (1,542 of 3,206 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.89 · 33.8% (1,085 of 3,206 decks)
- Souvenir Snatcher relevance 0.92 · 31.2% (1,000 of 3,206 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.87 · 36.0% (1,153 of 3,206 decks)
- Trumpeting Gnarr relevance 0.91 · 31.1% (997 of 3,206 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.87 · 35.6% (1,141 of 3,206 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.93 · 28.3% (907 of 3,206 decks)
- Artisan of Forms relevance 0.97 · 23.6% (758 of 3,206 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.89 · 31.8% (1,021 of 3,206 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.90 · 29.3% (940 of 3,206 decks)
- Slippery Bogle relevance 0.91 · 28.2% (904 of 3,206 decks)
- Gnarlback Rhino relevance 0.96 · 22.3% (714 of 3,206 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.68 · 54.4% (1,744 of 3,206 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.68 · 53.4% (1,713 of 3,206 decks)
- Archipelagore relevance 0.92 · 23.1% (741 of 3,206 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.94 · 19.9% (637 of 3,206 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.91 · 76.8% (2,463 of 3,206 decks)
- Spellwild Ouphe relevance 0.94 · 53.0% (1,699 of 3,206 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 0.87 · 58.5% (1,874 of 3,206 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 0.87 · 55.4% (1,776 of 3,206 decks)
- Triton Fortune Hunter relevance 0.94 · 47.8% (1,534 of 3,206 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.91 · 45.0% (1,444 of 3,206 decks)
- Pouncing Shoreshark relevance 0.90 · 45.8% (1,468 of 3,206 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.81 · 55.7% (1,785 of 3,206 decks)
- Sawtusk Demolisher relevance 0.90 · 42.4% (1,358 of 3,206 decks)
- Dreamtail Heron relevance 0.90 · 42.0% (1,347 of 3,206 decks)
- Glowstone Recluse relevance 0.93 · 36.1% (1,158 of 3,206 decks)
- Parcelbeast relevance 0.86 · 43.1% (1,383 of 3,206 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.86 · 43.4% (1,392 of 3,206 decks)
- Auspicious Starrix relevance 0.89 · 38.4% (1,230 of 3,206 decks)
- Timber Paladin relevance 0.97 · 28.6% (918 of 3,206 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.96 · 29.3% (939 of 3,206 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.78 · 48.1% (1,542 of 3,206 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.89 · 33.8% (1,085 of 3,206 decks)
- Souvenir Snatcher relevance 0.92 · 31.2% (1,000 of 3,206 decks)
- Trumpeting Gnarr relevance 0.91 · 31.1% (997 of 3,206 decks)
- Artisan of Forms relevance 0.97 · 23.6% (758 of 3,206 decks)
- Slippery Bogle relevance 0.91 · 28.2% (904 of 3,206 decks)
- Gnarlback Rhino relevance 0.96 · 22.3% (714 of 3,206 decks)
- Archipelagore relevance 0.92 · 23.1% (741 of 3,206 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.92 · 19.1% (611 of 3,206 decks)
- Errant, Street Artist relevance 0.86 · 25.4% (815 of 3,206 decks)
- Pollywog Symbiote relevance 0.92 · 13.2% (424 of 3,206 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.92 · 13.0% (417 of 3,206 decks)
- Essence Symbiote relevance 0.95 · 11.5% (368 of 3,206 decks)
- Gladecover Scout relevance 0.95 · 10.7% (342 of 3,206 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.80 · 21.4% (686 of 3,206 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.86 · 14.1% (451 of 3,206 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 0.82 · 16.9% (542 of 3,206 decks)
- Venomthrope relevance 0.89 · 10.6% (341 of 3,206 decks)
- Eutropia the Twice-Favored relevance 0.92 · 8.7% (278 of 3,206 decks)
- Meletis Astronomer relevance 0.96 · 6.2% (200 of 3,206 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.74 · 19.2% (617 of 3,206 decks)
- Aura Gnarlid relevance 0.94 · 6.6% (211 of 3,206 decks)
- Mysterious Egg relevance 0.95 · 5.9% (190 of 3,206 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 0.72 · 20.6% (660 of 3,206 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.87 · 7.3% (235 of 3,206 decks)
- Composer of Spring relevance 0.91 · 5.6% (181 of 3,206 decks)
- Protean Thaumaturge relevance 0.89 · 5.6% (178 of 3,206 decks)
- Silhana Ledgewalker relevance 0.84 · 6.8% (217 of 3,206 decks)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.85 · 5.0% (160 of 3,206 decks)
- Triton Cavalry relevance 0.93 · 4.4% (142 of 3,206 decks)
- Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan relevance 0.82 · 6.5% (207 of 3,206 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.57 · 27.3% (875 of 3,206 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.44 · 39.6% (1,268 of 3,206 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.63 · 8.6% (275 of 3,206 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All artifacts (13)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.71 · 44.4% (1,422 of 3,206 decks)
- Helm of the Gods relevance 0.92 · 5.6% (180 of 3,206 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (325 of 3,206 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (241 of 3,206 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.48 · 5.6% (180 of 3,206 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 17.7% (566 of 3,206 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.25 · 17.6% (563 of 3,206 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.26 · 14.9% (479 of 3,206 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.24 · 19.8% (634 of 3,206 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (109 of 3,206 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (122 of 3,206 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 52.0% (1,667 of 3,206 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 63.5% (2,036 of 3,206 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.85 · 68.9% (2,209 of 3,206 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.90 · 62.9% (2,016 of 3,206 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.86 · 64.9% (2,080 of 3,206 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.86 · 61.2% (1,962 of 3,206 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.85 · 61.7% (1,979 of 3,206 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.83 · 59.7% (1,915 of 3,206 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.72 · 69.7% (2,234 of 3,206 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.95 · 41.1% (1,319 of 3,206 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.89 · 45.1% (1,447 of 3,206 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.81 · 53.7% (1,723 of 3,206 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.92 · 41.4% (1,326 of 3,206 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.88 · 44.0% (1,411 of 3,206 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.80 · 51.1% (1,638 of 3,206 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.94 · 31.4% (1,008 of 3,206 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.92 · 32.9% (1,054 of 3,206 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.95 · 30.0% (961 of 3,206 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.88 · 36.6% (1,173 of 3,206 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.87 · 36.0% (1,153 of 3,206 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.93 · 28.3% (907 of 3,206 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.89 · 31.8% (1,021 of 3,206 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.68 · 54.4% (1,744 of 3,206 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.94 · 19.9% (637 of 3,206 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.87 · 27.0% (866 of 3,206 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.89 · 23.9% (766 of 3,206 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.91 · 21.9% (703 of 3,206 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (547 of 3,206 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.91 · 17.7% (568 of 3,206 decks)
- Mark of Sakiko relevance 0.95 · 13.8% (442 of 3,206 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.85 · 20.3% (651 of 3,206 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.92 · 13.4% (431 of 3,206 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.88 · 14.3% (459 of 3,206 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.87 · 13.9% (446 of 3,206 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.93 · 10.3% (329 of 3,206 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.89 · 11.9% (382 of 3,206 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.93 · 9.0% (290 of 3,206 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.91 · 9.8% (313 of 3,206 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.85 · 12.2% (392 of 3,206 decks)
- Karametra's Favor relevance 0.92 · 9.0% (290 of 3,206 decks)
- Giant Inheritance relevance 0.92 · 7.8% (249 of 3,206 decks)
- Animal Friend relevance 0.92 · 6.5% (207 of 3,206 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 0.82 · 10.7% (344 of 3,206 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.89 · 6.2% (198 of 3,206 decks)
- Verdant Embrace relevance 0.88 · 6.1% (197 of 3,206 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.87 · 6.7% (214 of 3,206 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.84 · 7.4% (238 of 3,206 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.68 · 15.4% (494 of 3,206 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.85 · 5.0% (161 of 3,206 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.75 · 9.7% (310 of 3,206 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.81 · 6.7% (214 of 3,206 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.75 · 7.6% (244 of 3,206 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.92 · 33.5% (1,074 of 3,206 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.90 · 29.3% (940 of 3,206 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.68 · 53.4% (1,713 of 3,206 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 0.97 · 11.7% (376 of 3,206 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.76 · 30.5% (978 of 3,206 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.92 · 12.6% (404 of 3,206 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.85 · 17.1% (547 of 3,206 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.75 · 25.0% (801 of 3,206 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.58 · 47.1% (1,509 of 3,206 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.92 · 6.7% (216 of 3,206 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.87 · 7.2% (230 of 3,206 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.83 · 8.2% (263 of 3,206 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.67 · 15.6% (499 of 3,206 decks)
- Poison the Blade relevance 0.89 · 4.7% (152 of 3,206 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.66 · 17.0% (545 of 3,206 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.74 · 11.1% (356 of 3,206 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (451 of 3,206 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.67 · 15.0% (481 of 3,206 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.51 · 37.6% (1,206 of 3,206 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.76 · 7.4% (236 of 3,206 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.51 · 35.7% (1,145 of 3,206 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.70 · 9.1% (292 of 3,206 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.47 · 38.6% (1,239 of 3,206 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.59 · 15.1% (485 of 3,206 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.69 · 7.4% (237 of 3,206 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.71 · 5.1% (163 of 3,206 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.79 · 3.9% (125 of 3,206 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.59 · 7.8% (250 of 3,206 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.61 · 4.9% (157 of 3,206 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.49 · 12.4% (398 of 3,206 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.77 · 3.2% (104 of 3,206 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.53 · 8.3% (266 of 3,206 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (315 of 3,206 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.56 · 5.4% (172 of 3,206 decks)
- Gold Rush relevance 0.83 · 2.5% (80 of 3,206 decks)
- Swell of Growth relevance 0.78 · 2.9% (92 of 3,206 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.78 · 2.7% (87 of 3,206 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.45 · 11.9% (381 of 3,206 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.64 · 3.8% (122 of 3,206 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.59 · 4.2% (135 of 3,206 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.62 · 3.8% (123 of 3,206 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.41 · 11.7% (374 of 3,206 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.67 · 2.5% (80 of 3,206 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.44 · 5.2% (167 of 3,206 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (94 of 3,206 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.28 · 27.3% (874 of 3,206 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (212 of 3,206 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (218 of 3,206 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (802 of 3,206 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.26 · 21.6% (691 of 3,206 decks)
All sorceries (35)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.87 · 35.6% (1,141 of 3,206 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.83 · 28.4% (912 of 3,206 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.75 · 22.5% (721 of 3,206 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.78 · 17.5% (560 of 3,206 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.57 · 38.1% (1,223 of 3,206 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.68 · 20.8% (667 of 3,206 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.61 · 17.7% (569 of 3,206 decks)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 0.89 · 4.2% (135 of 3,206 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.76 · 5.9% (188 of 3,206 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.69 · 7.8% (249 of 3,206 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.71 · 5.1% (165 of 3,206 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.55 · 15.3% (489 of 3,206 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.66 · 6.6% (211 of 3,206 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.48 · 22.1% (710 of 3,206 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.86 · 3.0% (97 of 3,206 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.61 · 5.0% (160 of 3,206 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.70 · 3.0% (97 of 3,206 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.59 · 3.9% (124 of 3,206 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.64 · 3.3% (106 of 3,206 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.67 · 3.0% (95 of 3,206 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.69 · 2.7% (85 of 3,206 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.56 · 2.7% (85 of 3,206 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (131 of 3,206 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.48 · 3.2% (102 of 3,206 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (90 of 3,206 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.20 · 27.2% (871 of 3,206 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 15.9% (510 of 3,206 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.22 · 13.4% (431 of 3,206 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.19 · 23.6% (757 of 3,206 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.17 · 31.3% (1,002 of 3,206 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (450 of 3,206 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (146 of 3,206 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (97 of 3,206 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (85 of 3,206 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (85 of 3,206 decks)
All utility lands (25)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.49 · 10.7% (344 of 3,206 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.52 · 7.3% (235 of 3,206 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.47 · 11.4% (366 of 3,206 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (365 of 3,206 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (168 of 3,206 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.57 · 3.6% (114 of 3,206 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (365 of 3,206 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 11.5% (369 of 3,206 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.26 · 31.2% (999 of 3,206 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.29 · 20.6% (661 of 3,206 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (124 of 3,206 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (359 of 3,206 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.28 · 15.9% (509 of 3,206 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (252 of 3,206 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (499 of 3,206 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.40 · 4.1% (132 of 3,206 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.26 · 19.4% (623 of 3,206 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 19.3% (618 of 3,206 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.28 · 12.9% (412 of 3,206 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (270 of 3,206 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.20 · 29.1% (932 of 3,206 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (147 of 3,206 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (200 of 3,206 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 45.7% (1,465 of 3,206 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (161 of 3,206 decks)
All lands (38)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.34 · 16.1% (517 of 3,206 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.30 · 25.8% (826 of 3,206 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (460 of 3,206 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.29 · 22.2% (713 of 3,206 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (160 of 3,206 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.24 · 30.8% (988 of 3,206 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (140 of 3,206 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (343 of 3,206 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (124 of 3,206 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.25 · 19.9% (637 of 3,206 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.26 · 17.7% (567 of 3,206 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (312 of 3,206 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.26 · 14.6% (467 of 3,206 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.31 · 5.8% (187 of 3,206 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (157 of 3,206 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (160 of 3,206 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (176 of 3,206 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (183 of 3,206 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 24.9% (798 of 3,206 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.18 · 43.3% (1,388 of 3,206 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.18 · 43.6% (1,398 of 3,206 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.16 · 55.5% (1,778 of 3,206 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (146 of 3,206 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (133 of 3,206 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 10.4% (335 of 3,206 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.16 · 47.0% (1,508 of 3,206 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (86 of 3,206 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 10.6% (341 of 3,206 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.18 · 34.1% (1,093 of 3,206 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 55.7% (1,787 of 3,206 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (139 of 3,206 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.14 · 43.8% (1,405 of 3,206 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (85 of 3,206 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.10 · 66.5% (2,131 of 3,206 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (81 of 3,206 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 80.0% (2,565 of 3,206 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 91.2% (2,924 of 3,206 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.0% (2,919 of 3,206 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief, from 3,206 real Commander decks.