Coiling Woodworm
Played in 144 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
29.4% Green
All commanders (10)
- Thriss, Nantuko Primus relevance 1.52 · 11.1% (4 of 36 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.05 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Reptil, Dinomorpher relevance 1.02 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.80 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.60 · 1.2% (2 of 161 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.40 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.38 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.37 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.37 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 1.83 · 50.0% (72 of 144 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 1.69 · 38.9% (56 of 144 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 1.65 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 1.38 · 28.5% (41 of 144 decks)
- Treefolk Seedlings relevance 1.26 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Traproot Kami relevance 1.26 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Flourishing Bloom-Kin relevance 1.01 · 20.1% (29 of 144 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.00 · 43.1% (62 of 144 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.86 · 23.6% (34 of 144 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.85 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.83 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.83 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (35 of 144 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Fruition relevance 0.70 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.68 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.67 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Timbermaw Larva relevance 0.66 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Nessian Game Warden relevance 0.65 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.63 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.63 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.62 · 19.4% (28 of 144 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.62 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.62 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.61 · 29.9% (43 of 144 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.58 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 1.83 · 50.0% (72 of 144 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 1.69 · 38.9% (56 of 144 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 1.65 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 1.38 · 28.5% (41 of 144 decks)
- Treefolk Seedlings relevance 1.26 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Traproot Kami relevance 1.26 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Flourishing Bloom-Kin relevance 1.01 · 20.1% (29 of 144 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.86 · 23.6% (34 of 144 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.83 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (35 of 144 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.68 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.67 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Timbermaw Larva relevance 0.66 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Nessian Game Warden relevance 0.65 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.62 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.62 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.58 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.53 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.50 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.50 · 19.4% (28 of 144 decks)
- Village Elder relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.48 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.47 · 23.6% (34 of 144 decks)
- Allosaurus Rider relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Mirkwood Channeler relevance 0.46 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.45 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.57 · 20.1% (29 of 144 decks)
- Staff of the Wild Magus relevance 0.53 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.00 · 43.1% (62 of 144 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.83 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.63 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.49 · 17.4% (25 of 144 decks)
All instants (1)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.62 · 19.4% (28 of 144 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.85 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Fruition relevance 0.70 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.57 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.57 · 19.4% (28 of 144 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.52 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.49 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.49 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
All planeswalkers (4)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.63 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.61 · 29.9% (43 of 144 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.53 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.49 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
EDH data for Coiling Woodworm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 144 real decks.