Clash of Wills
Played in 325 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (6)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.12 · 1.7% (113 of 6,514 decks)
- Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.74 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- The Fifth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.63 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Prava of the Steel Legion // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 0.62 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Medomai the Ageless relevance 0.50 · 1.0% (3 of 289 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.27 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Condescend relevance 2.16 · 45.2% (147 of 325 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 1.90 · 34.8% (113 of 325 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.80 · 29.5% (96 of 325 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.75 · 30.8% (100 of 325 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.75 · 28.6% (93 of 325 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.74 · 25.2% (82 of 325 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 1.70 · 26.5% (86 of 325 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.66 · 41.8% (136 of 325 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 1.49 · 26.5% (86 of 325 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.48 · 22.5% (73 of 325 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.46 · 23.4% (76 of 325 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.44 · 24.0% (78 of 325 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 1.44 · 24.0% (78 of 325 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 1.42 · 28.6% (93 of 325 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.35 · 20.6% (67 of 325 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 1.33 · 21.5% (70 of 325 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.32 · 30.2% (98 of 325 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 1.30 · 20.0% (65 of 325 decks)
- Abjure relevance 1.27 · 24.3% (79 of 325 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 1.26 · 21.8% (71 of 325 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.25 · 26.8% (87 of 325 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.25 · 21.2% (69 of 325 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.23 · 18.2% (59 of 325 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 1.23 · 21.8% (71 of 325 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.22 · 20.3% (66 of 325 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 1.21 · 21.2% (69 of 325 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.21 · 29.8% (97 of 325 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 1.20 · 18.8% (61 of 325 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.20 · 18.5% (60 of 325 decks)
- Mana Tithe relevance 1.20 · 27.1% (88 of 325 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Chancellor of the Annex relevance 1.12 · 21.5% (70 of 325 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 1.12 · 17.5% (57 of 325 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Collective Restraint relevance 1.09 · 20.3% (66 of 325 decks)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 1.00 · 16.0% (52 of 325 decks)
All instants (46)
- Condescend relevance 2.16 · 45.2% (147 of 325 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 1.90 · 34.8% (113 of 325 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.80 · 29.5% (96 of 325 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.75 · 30.8% (100 of 325 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.75 · 28.6% (93 of 325 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.74 · 25.2% (82 of 325 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 1.70 · 26.5% (86 of 325 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.66 · 41.8% (136 of 325 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 1.49 · 26.5% (86 of 325 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.48 · 22.5% (73 of 325 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.46 · 23.4% (76 of 325 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.44 · 24.0% (78 of 325 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 1.44 · 24.0% (78 of 325 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 1.42 · 28.6% (93 of 325 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.35 · 20.6% (67 of 325 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 1.33 · 21.5% (70 of 325 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.32 · 30.2% (98 of 325 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 1.30 · 20.0% (65 of 325 decks)
- Abjure relevance 1.27 · 24.3% (79 of 325 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 1.26 · 21.8% (71 of 325 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.25 · 26.8% (87 of 325 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.25 · 21.2% (69 of 325 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.23 · 18.2% (59 of 325 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 1.23 · 21.8% (71 of 325 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.22 · 20.3% (66 of 325 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 1.21 · 21.2% (69 of 325 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.21 · 29.8% (97 of 325 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 1.20 · 18.8% (61 of 325 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.20 · 18.5% (60 of 325 decks)
- Mana Tithe relevance 1.20 · 27.1% (88 of 325 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 1.19 · 20.0% (65 of 325 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.19 · 19.7% (64 of 325 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 1.17 · 22.5% (73 of 325 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 1.16 · 30.2% (98 of 325 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 1.14 · 24.0% (78 of 325 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 1.13 · 29.2% (95 of 325 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 1.13 · 20.9% (68 of 325 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.11 · 19.4% (63 of 325 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.09 · 22.2% (72 of 325 decks)
- Absorb relevance 1.07 · 39.7% (129 of 325 decks)
- Desertion relevance 1.06 · 18.5% (60 of 325 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 1.05 · 16.9% (55 of 325 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 1.02 · 18.2% (59 of 325 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.01 · 17.8% (58 of 325 decks)
- Disallow relevance 1.00 · 25.5% (83 of 325 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 0.97 · 14.2% (46 of 325 decks)
EDH data for Clash of Wills: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 325 real decks.