Clash of Wills
Played in 2,081 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (6)
- Zimone, Infinite Analyst relevance 3.79 · 12.4% (1,839 of 14,873 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.64 · 1.4% (35 of 2,429 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.26 · 1.0% (5 of 478 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Beast, Erudite Aerialist relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Condescend relevance 2.66 · 76.6% (1,594 of 2,081 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 2.54 · 74.9% (1,559 of 2,081 decks)
- Spectral Denial relevance 2.52 · 65.1% (1,354 of 2,081 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 2.31 · 55.2% (1,149 of 2,081 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 2.04 · 80.5% (1,676 of 2,081 decks)
- Spell Burst relevance 1.97 · 48.1% (1,000 of 2,081 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 1.96 · 72.9% (1,518 of 2,081 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.87 · 76.2% (1,585 of 2,081 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.81 · 42.7% (889 of 2,081 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 1.78 · 66.7% (1,389 of 2,081 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 1.77 · 66.2% (1,378 of 2,081 decks)
- Owlin Spiralmancer relevance 1.76 · 63.5% (1,321 of 2,081 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 1.73 · 57.4% (1,195 of 2,081 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.73 · 68.0% (1,416 of 2,081 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.72 · 63.7% (1,326 of 2,081 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 1.71 · 65.0% (1,352 of 2,081 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 1.71 · 67.3% (1,400 of 2,081 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 1.70 · 60.2% (1,252 of 2,081 decks)
- Broodguard Elite relevance 1.66 · 45.2% (941 of 2,081 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 1.64 · 52.1% (1,085 of 2,081 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 1.64 · 82.1% (1,708 of 2,081 decks)
- Kinetic Ooze relevance 1.63 · 60.3% (1,255 of 2,081 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 1.61 · 50.9% (1,059 of 2,081 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.60 · 60.5% (1,260 of 2,081 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.58 · 58.6% (1,219 of 2,081 decks)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.51 · 53.6% (1,116 of 2,081 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 1.50 · 54.9% (1,142 of 2,081 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 1.47 · 55.5% (1,154 of 2,081 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 1.42 · 51.8% (1,078 of 2,081 decks)
- Geometer's Arthropod relevance 1.39 · 41.2% (858 of 2,081 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.87 · 76.2% (1,585 of 2,081 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 1.77 · 66.2% (1,378 of 2,081 decks)
- Owlin Spiralmancer relevance 1.76 · 63.5% (1,321 of 2,081 decks)
- Broodguard Elite relevance 1.66 · 45.2% (941 of 2,081 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 1.64 · 82.1% (1,708 of 2,081 decks)
- Kinetic Ooze relevance 1.63 · 60.3% (1,255 of 2,081 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.60 · 60.5% (1,260 of 2,081 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.58 · 58.6% (1,219 of 2,081 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 1.50 · 54.9% (1,142 of 2,081 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 1.42 · 51.8% (1,078 of 2,081 decks)
- Geometer's Arthropod relevance 1.39 · 41.2% (858 of 2,081 decks)
- Sporocyst relevance 1.36 · 33.4% (695 of 2,081 decks)
- Primo, the Unbounded relevance 1.28 · 43.9% (914 of 2,081 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.22 · 43.2% (900 of 2,081 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 1.21 · 43.8% (911 of 2,081 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.19 · 43.8% (911 of 2,081 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.16 · 31.3% (652 of 2,081 decks)
- Rampaging Yao Guai relevance 1.15 · 27.3% (568 of 2,081 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 1.07 · 39.4% (819 of 2,081 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.51 · 53.6% (1,116 of 2,081 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 1.35 · 46.7% (971 of 2,081 decks)
- Brass Infiniscope relevance 1.11 · 37.0% (771 of 2,081 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 2.04 · 80.5% (1,676 of 2,081 decks)
- Lattice Library relevance 1.35 · 46.6% (969 of 2,081 decks)
- Mana Bloom relevance 1.27 · 38.6% (803 of 2,081 decks)
All instants (14)
- Condescend relevance 2.66 · 76.6% (1,594 of 2,081 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 2.54 · 74.9% (1,559 of 2,081 decks)
- Spectral Denial relevance 2.52 · 65.1% (1,354 of 2,081 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 2.31 · 55.2% (1,149 of 2,081 decks)
- Spell Burst relevance 1.97 · 48.1% (1,000 of 2,081 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.81 · 42.7% (889 of 2,081 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 1.78 · 66.7% (1,389 of 2,081 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.73 · 68.0% (1,416 of 2,081 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 1.71 · 65.0% (1,352 of 2,081 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 1.71 · 67.3% (1,400 of 2,081 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 1.70 · 60.2% (1,252 of 2,081 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 1.64 · 52.1% (1,085 of 2,081 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 1.61 · 50.9% (1,059 of 2,081 decks)
- Change of Plans relevance 1.14 · 24.4% (507 of 2,081 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 1.96 · 72.9% (1,518 of 2,081 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 1.73 · 57.4% (1,195 of 2,081 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.72 · 63.7% (1,326 of 2,081 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 1.47 · 55.5% (1,154 of 2,081 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 1.29 · 48.7% (1,014 of 2,081 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.24 · 62.9% (1,308 of 2,081 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 1.20 · 34.0% (708 of 2,081 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 1.20 · 43.6% (908 of 2,081 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 1.15 · 38.9% (810 of 2,081 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 1.11 · 26.2% (546 of 2,081 decks)
All lands (1)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 1.11 · 51.7% (1,075 of 2,081 decks)
EDH data for Clash of Wills: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,081 real decks.