Clash of Wills
Played in 784 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 3.58 · 5.9% (689 of 11,713 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Condescend relevance 2.54 · 60.7% (476 of 784 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 2.17 · 73.5% (576 of 784 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 2.14 · 53.7% (421 of 784 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 2.04 · 64.4% (505 of 784 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 2.00 · 59.4% (466 of 784 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.81 · 52.7% (413 of 784 decks)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.78 · 50.8% (398 of 784 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.72 · 54.7% (429 of 784 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.69 · 51.1% (401 of 784 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.61 · 52.4% (411 of 784 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.60 · 48.0% (376 of 784 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 1.57 · 44.3% (347 of 784 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 1.56 · 41.3% (324 of 784 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 1.56 · 44.8% (351 of 784 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.55 · 45.7% (358 of 784 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.51 · 37.0% (290 of 784 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.51 · 44.6% (350 of 784 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.50 · 56.9% (446 of 784 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.50 · 42.3% (332 of 784 decks)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 1.48 · 41.6% (326 of 784 decks)
- Spectral Denial relevance 1.46 · 30.5% (239 of 784 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 1.42 · 37.8% (296 of 784 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 1.41 · 28.4% (223 of 784 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.40 · 39.8% (312 of 784 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.39 · 39.9% (313 of 784 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 1.35 · 32.1% (252 of 784 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 1.32 · 24.5% (192 of 784 decks)
- Spell Burst relevance 1.29 · 22.4% (176 of 784 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.27 · 30.0% (235 of 784 decks)
- Nexos relevance 1.26 · 31.3% (245 of 784 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 2.17 · 73.5% (576 of 784 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.81 · 52.7% (413 of 784 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.69 · 51.1% (401 of 784 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.61 · 52.4% (411 of 784 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.60 · 48.0% (376 of 784 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 1.57 · 44.3% (347 of 784 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 1.56 · 41.3% (324 of 784 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 1.56 · 44.8% (351 of 784 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.55 · 45.7% (358 of 784 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.50 · 42.3% (332 of 784 decks)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 1.48 · 41.6% (326 of 784 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 1.42 · 37.8% (296 of 784 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.39 · 39.9% (313 of 784 decks)
- Nexos relevance 1.26 · 31.3% (245 of 784 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 1.26 · 31.9% (250 of 784 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 1.24 · 33.9% (266 of 784 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 1.23 · 31.9% (250 of 784 decks)
- Capricopian relevance 1.17 · 26.1% (205 of 784 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.14 · 32.5% (255 of 784 decks)
- Wren's Run Hydra relevance 1.13 · 24.0% (188 of 784 decks)
- Feral Hydra relevance 1.12 · 22.6% (177 of 784 decks)
- Protean Hydra relevance 1.11 · 27.3% (214 of 784 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.78 · 50.8% (398 of 784 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 2.04 · 64.4% (505 of 784 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.23 · 44.8% (351 of 784 decks)
- Mana Bloom relevance 1.11 · 23.0% (180 of 784 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 1.05 · 32.0% (251 of 784 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 1.04 · 39.3% (308 of 784 decks)
All instants (14)
- Condescend relevance 2.54 · 60.7% (476 of 784 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 2.14 · 53.7% (421 of 784 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.51 · 37.0% (290 of 784 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.51 · 44.6% (350 of 784 decks)
- Spectral Denial relevance 1.46 · 30.5% (239 of 784 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 1.41 · 28.4% (223 of 784 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 1.32 · 24.5% (192 of 784 decks)
- Spell Burst relevance 1.29 · 22.4% (176 of 784 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.27 · 30.0% (235 of 784 decks)
- Death Wind relevance 1.17 · 20.0% (157 of 784 decks)
- Icy Blast relevance 1.16 · 24.9% (195 of 784 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 1.10 · 34.7% (272 of 784 decks)
- Slice from the Shadows relevance 1.09 · 22.4% (176 of 784 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 1.07 · 26.7% (209 of 784 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 2.00 · 59.4% (466 of 784 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.72 · 54.7% (429 of 784 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.50 · 56.9% (446 of 784 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.40 · 39.8% (312 of 784 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 1.35 · 32.1% (252 of 784 decks)
- Profane Command relevance 1.25 · 33.4% (262 of 784 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 1.25 · 58.3% (457 of 784 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 1.10 · 37.1% (291 of 784 decks)
EDH data for Clash of Wills: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 784 real decks.