Clash of Wills
Played in 174 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 1.70 · 2.5% (12 of 477 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.76 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- X relevance 0.68 · 2.0% (2 of 102 decks)
- Sivitri Scarzam relevance 0.46 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cancel relevance 1.46 · 36.8% (64 of 174 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.20 · 27.0% (47 of 174 decks)
- Condescend relevance 0.97 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.86 · 12.6% (22 of 174 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (48 of 174 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.71 · 17.2% (30 of 174 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.70 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.68 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.67 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.66 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 0.62 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Rakshasa's Disdain relevance 0.62 · 9.2% (16 of 174 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.50 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.49 · 9.8% (17 of 174 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (30 of 174 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (16 of 174 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.46 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Dash Hopes relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (12 of 174 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.45 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Recover relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (12 of 174 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.44 · 36.2% (63 of 174 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (13 of 174 decks)
- Dimir Locket relevance 0.44 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (13 of 174 decks)
- Countersquall relevance 0.43 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Doom Blade relevance 0.43 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.42 · 9.2% (16 of 174 decks)
All creatures (1)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.42 · 9.2% (16 of 174 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Dimir Locket relevance 0.44 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Dimir Cluestone relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (17 of 174 decks)
All instants (39)
- Cancel relevance 1.46 · 36.8% (64 of 174 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.20 · 27.0% (47 of 174 decks)
- Condescend relevance 0.97 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.86 · 12.6% (22 of 174 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (48 of 174 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.71 · 17.2% (30 of 174 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.70 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.68 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.67 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.66 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 0.62 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Rakshasa's Disdain relevance 0.62 · 9.2% (16 of 174 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.49 · 9.8% (17 of 174 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (30 of 174 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (16 of 174 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.46 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Dash Hopes relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (12 of 174 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.45 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.44 · 36.2% (63 of 174 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (13 of 174 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (13 of 174 decks)
- Countersquall relevance 0.43 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Doom Blade relevance 0.43 · 10.9% (19 of 174 decks)
- Cast Down relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (14 of 174 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.40 · 17.8% (31 of 174 decks)
- Dazzling Denial relevance 0.40 · 6.3% (11 of 174 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.40 · 7.5% (13 of 174 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Radical Idea relevance 0.40 · 6.3% (11 of 174 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.39 · 28.2% (49 of 174 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (13 of 174 decks)
- Psychic Strike relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (17 of 174 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (18 of 174 decks)
- Counterpoint relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Deprive relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (10 of 174 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (10 of 174 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Duress relevance 0.50 · 11.5% (20 of 174 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (15 of 174 decks)
- Recover relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (12 of 174 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (12 of 174 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.43 · 21.8% (38 of 174 decks)
- Westvale Abbey // Ormendahl, Profane Prince relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (13 of 174 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (50 of 174 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.44 · 14.9% (26 of 174 decks)
EDH data for Clash of Wills: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 174 real decks.