Change the Equation

Played in 3,317 decks

Change the Equation
$0.29 €0.27

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Dromar, the Banisher relevance 3.87 · 16.6% (57 of 343 decks)
  2. Spider-Man 2099 relevance 3.70 · 9.5% (142 of 1,495 decks)
  3. Riku of Many Paths relevance 3.20 · 4.1% (142 of 3,438 decks)
  4. Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 2.75 · 2.8% (82 of 2,939 decks)
  5. Seven of Nine relevance 2.52 · 12.1% (18 of 149 decks)
  6. Blind Seer relevance 2.17 · 7.9% (36 of 456 decks)
  7. Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 2.14 · 3.5% (106 of 3,036 decks)
  8. Ertai Resurrected relevance 2.04 · 4.4% (20 of 456 decks)
  9. Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 1.92 · 1.7% (96 of 5,817 decks)
  10. Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 1.75 · 2.6% (17 of 649 decks)
  11. Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 1.72 · 4.9% (10 of 205 decks)
  12. Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.56 · 1.4% (27 of 1,898 decks)
  13. Tymna the Weaver // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 1.45 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
  14. Aang, Swift Savior // Aang and La, Ocean's Fury relevance 1.44 · 2.0% (23 of 1,156 decks)
  15. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 1.43 · 11.1% (4 of 36 decks)
  16. Nymris, Oona's Trickster relevance 1.23 · 1.5% (12 of 780 decks)
  17. Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 1.16 · 1.5% (11 of 720 decks)
  18. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 1.15 · 1.1% (11 of 971 decks)
  19. Rona, Sheoldred's Faithful relevance 1.06 · 2.2% (6 of 269 decks)
  20. Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.97 · 1.7% (16 of 915 decks)
  21. Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.91 · 1.1% (26 of 2,313 decks)
  22. Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 0.91 · 1.8% (13 of 736 decks)
  23. Salacinder and Soot, Rascals relevance 0.86 · 11.8% (2 of 17 decks)
  24. Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.86 · 1.3% (17 of 1,302 decks)
  25. Dungeon Delver // Gut, True Soul Zealot relevance 0.82 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
  26. Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Cultist of the Absolute relevance 0.76 · 5.0% (2 of 40 decks)
  27. Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
  28. Kianne, Dean of Substance // Imbraham, Dean of Theory relevance 0.68 · 2.9% (2 of 69 decks)
  29. Mondo Gecko relevance 0.68 · 1.8% (6 of 327 decks)
  30. Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.66 · 1.3% (2 of 159 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Lose Focus
    1.69 25.0%
    $0.19 €0.25
  • Spell Snare
    1.60 26.7%
    $0.48 €0.53
  • Memory Lapse
    1.57 29.4%
    $0.60 €0.55
  • Spell Pierce
    1.44 35.9%
    $0.30 €0.23
  • Dispel
    1.39 32.4%
    $0.37 €0.42
  • Mana Leak
    1.38 29.1%
    $0.29 €0.19
  • Wash Away
    1.21 22.9%
    $0.46 €0.97
  • Remand
    1.08 18.8%
    $0.34 €0.39
  • Stern Scolding
    1.08 15.7%
    $4.15 €1.78
  • Negate
    1.04 42.9%
    $0.25 €0.06
All most relevant (30)
  1. Lose Focus relevance 1.69 · 25.0% (830 of 3,317 decks)
  2. Spell Snare relevance 1.60 · 26.7% (887 of 3,317 decks)
  3. Memory Lapse relevance 1.57 · 29.4% (974 of 3,317 decks)
  4. Spell Pierce relevance 1.44 · 35.9% (1,190 of 3,317 decks)
  5. Dispel relevance 1.39 · 32.4% (1,076 of 3,317 decks)
  6. Mana Leak relevance 1.38 · 29.1% (965 of 3,317 decks)
  7. Wash Away relevance 1.21 · 22.9% (761 of 3,317 decks)
  8. Remand relevance 1.08 · 18.8% (624 of 3,317 decks)
  9. Stern Scolding relevance 1.08 · 15.7% (522 of 3,317 decks)
  10. Negate relevance 1.04 · 42.9% (1,424 of 3,317 decks)
  11. Force Spike relevance 1.00 · 14.0% (466 of 3,317 decks)
  12. Tale's End relevance 0.83 · 14.2% (470 of 3,317 decks)
  13. Counterspell relevance 0.79 · 48.1% (1,595 of 3,317 decks)
  14. Archmage's Charm relevance 0.76 · 16.0% (532 of 3,317 decks)
  15. Brainstorm relevance 0.73 · 29.4% (976 of 3,317 decks)
  16. Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.73 · 18.4% (609 of 3,317 decks)
  17. Cryptic Command relevance 0.72 · 15.5% (514 of 3,317 decks)
  18. Daze relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (467 of 3,317 decks)
  19. Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.69 · 15.6% (516 of 3,317 decks)
  20. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.68 · 33.0% (1,096 of 3,317 decks)
  21. Unsubstantiate relevance 0.68 · 11.6% (384 of 3,317 decks)
  22. Arcane Denial relevance 0.67 · 28.4% (941 of 3,317 decks)
  23. Mystical Dispute relevance 0.67 · 9.8% (324 of 3,317 decks)
  24. Defabricate relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (343 of 3,317 decks)
  25. Frantic Search relevance 0.65 · 24.9% (825 of 3,317 decks)
  26. Mystic Confluence relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (458 of 3,317 decks)
  27. Brainsurge relevance 0.63 · 14.1% (469 of 3,317 decks)
  28. Miscalculation relevance 0.62 · 8.8% (293 of 3,317 decks)
  29. Winds of Rebuke relevance 0.61 · 8.8% (293 of 3,317 decks)
  30. Preordain relevance 0.61 · 19.4% (644 of 3,317 decks)

Creatures

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Subtlety
    0.54 10.0%
    $9.48 €11.31
All creatures (1)
  1. Subtlety relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (332 of 3,317 decks)

Enchantments

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Amphibian Downpour
    0.69 15.6%
    $2.15 €1.61
All enchantments (1)
  1. Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.69 · 15.6% (516 of 3,317 decks)

Instants

39

Showing 1-10 of 39

Page size
  • Lose Focus
    1.69 25.0%
    $0.19 €0.25
  • Spell Snare
    1.60 26.7%
    $0.48 €0.53
  • Memory Lapse
    1.57 29.4%
    $0.60 €0.55
  • Spell Pierce
    1.44 35.9%
    $0.30 €0.23
  • Dispel
    1.39 32.4%
    $0.37 €0.42
  • Mana Leak
    1.38 29.1%
    $0.29 €0.19
  • Wash Away
    1.21 22.9%
    $0.46 €0.97
  • Remand
    1.08 18.8%
    $0.34 €0.39
  • Stern Scolding
    1.08 15.7%
    $4.15 €1.78
  • Negate
    1.04 42.9%
    $0.25 €0.06
All instants (39)
  1. Lose Focus relevance 1.69 · 25.0% (830 of 3,317 decks)
  2. Spell Snare relevance 1.60 · 26.7% (887 of 3,317 decks)
  3. Memory Lapse relevance 1.57 · 29.4% (974 of 3,317 decks)
  4. Spell Pierce relevance 1.44 · 35.9% (1,190 of 3,317 decks)
  5. Dispel relevance 1.39 · 32.4% (1,076 of 3,317 decks)
  6. Mana Leak relevance 1.38 · 29.1% (965 of 3,317 decks)
  7. Wash Away relevance 1.21 · 22.9% (761 of 3,317 decks)
  8. Remand relevance 1.08 · 18.8% (624 of 3,317 decks)
  9. Stern Scolding relevance 1.08 · 15.7% (522 of 3,317 decks)
  10. Negate relevance 1.04 · 42.9% (1,424 of 3,317 decks)
  11. Force Spike relevance 1.00 · 14.0% (466 of 3,317 decks)
  12. Tale's End relevance 0.83 · 14.2% (470 of 3,317 decks)
  13. Counterspell relevance 0.79 · 48.1% (1,595 of 3,317 decks)
  14. Archmage's Charm relevance 0.76 · 16.0% (532 of 3,317 decks)
  15. Brainstorm relevance 0.73 · 29.4% (976 of 3,317 decks)
  16. Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.73 · 18.4% (609 of 3,317 decks)
  17. Cryptic Command relevance 0.72 · 15.5% (514 of 3,317 decks)
  18. Daze relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (467 of 3,317 decks)
  19. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.68 · 33.0% (1,096 of 3,317 decks)
  20. Unsubstantiate relevance 0.68 · 11.6% (384 of 3,317 decks)
  21. Arcane Denial relevance 0.67 · 28.4% (941 of 3,317 decks)
  22. Mystical Dispute relevance 0.67 · 9.8% (324 of 3,317 decks)
  23. Defabricate relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (343 of 3,317 decks)
  24. Frantic Search relevance 0.65 · 24.9% (825 of 3,317 decks)
  25. Mystic Confluence relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (458 of 3,317 decks)
  26. Brainsurge relevance 0.63 · 14.1% (469 of 3,317 decks)
  27. Miscalculation relevance 0.62 · 8.8% (293 of 3,317 decks)
  28. Winds of Rebuke relevance 0.61 · 8.8% (293 of 3,317 decks)
  29. Resculpt relevance 0.60 · 14.1% (467 of 3,317 decks)
  30. Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (441 of 3,317 decks)
  31. Drown in the Loch relevance 0.57 · 12.3% (409 of 3,317 decks)
  32. Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (385 of 3,317 decks)
  33. Annul relevance 0.56 · 10.1% (334 of 3,317 decks)
  34. Dig Through Time relevance 0.56 · 14.4% (479 of 3,317 decks)
  35. Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 13.7% (454 of 3,317 decks)
  36. Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.54 · 10.8% (357 of 3,317 decks)
  37. Dispersal Shield relevance 0.54 · 6.8% (225 of 3,317 decks)
  38. Cancel relevance 0.53 · 10.6% (353 of 3,317 decks)
  39. Impulse relevance 0.53 · 10.3% (342 of 3,317 decks)

Sorceries

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Preordain
    0.61 19.4%
    $0.88 €1.21
  • Step Through
    0.59 11.5%
    $0.23 €0.14
  • Gitaxian Probe
    0.57 15.2%
    $4.23 €3.37
  • Ponder
    0.55 18.6%
    $3.31 €3.73
All sorceries (4)
  1. Preordain relevance 0.61 · 19.4% (644 of 3,317 decks)
  2. Step Through relevance 0.59 · 11.5% (381 of 3,317 decks)
  3. Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.57 · 15.2% (504 of 3,317 decks)
  4. Ponder relevance 0.55 · 18.6% (617 of 3,317 decks)

Utility Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Cephalid Coliseum
    0.78 18.9%
    $0.31 €0.28
  • 0.61 12.7%
    $0.41 €0.49
  • Mystic Sanctuary
    0.61 19.8%
    $1.54 €1.32
  • 0.60 13.3%
    $0.51 €0.54
All utility lands (4)
  1. Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.78 · 18.9% (627 of 3,317 decks)
  2. Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.61 · 12.7% (420 of 3,317 decks)
  3. Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.61 · 19.8% (657 of 3,317 decks)
  4. Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.60 · 13.3% (440 of 3,317 decks)

Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Ash Barrens
    0.55 17.8%
    $0.33 €0.10
All lands (1)
  1. Ash Barrens relevance 0.55 · 17.8% (590 of 3,317 decks)

EDH data for Change the Equation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,317 real decks.