Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 2.90 · 1.9% (141 of 7,277 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.59 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 1.51 · 39.4% (82 of 208 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 1.51 · 50.0% (104 of 208 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.49 · 37.0% (77 of 208 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 1.45 · 41.3% (86 of 208 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 1.37 · 45.2% (94 of 208 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.33 · 24.5% (51 of 208 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 1.29 · 23.6% (49 of 208 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 1.27 · 30.8% (64 of 208 decks)
- Displace relevance 1.23 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.22 · 44.2% (92 of 208 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.20 · 30.3% (63 of 208 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.14 · 32.2% (67 of 208 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 1.13 · 35.1% (73 of 208 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.10 · 36.5% (76 of 208 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.07 · 25.5% (53 of 208 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.06 · 48.1% (100 of 208 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 1.05 · 31.3% (65 of 208 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 1.05 · 22.1% (46 of 208 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 1.05 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 1.05 · 23.1% (48 of 208 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 1.00 · 28.8% (60 of 208 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.99 · 25.0% (52 of 208 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.99 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.99 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.98 · 33.7% (70 of 208 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.97 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Phyrexian Delver relevance 0.94 · 18.3% (38 of 208 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.94 · 24.0% (50 of 208 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.93 · 37.5% (78 of 208 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.91 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 1.51 · 39.4% (82 of 208 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 1.51 · 50.0% (104 of 208 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.49 · 37.0% (77 of 208 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.33 · 24.5% (51 of 208 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 1.29 · 23.6% (49 of 208 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 1.27 · 30.8% (64 of 208 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.22 · 44.2% (92 of 208 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.14 · 32.2% (67 of 208 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 1.13 · 35.1% (73 of 208 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.10 · 36.5% (76 of 208 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.06 · 48.1% (100 of 208 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 1.05 · 31.3% (65 of 208 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 1.05 · 22.1% (46 of 208 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 1.05 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 1.05 · 23.1% (48 of 208 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 1.00 · 28.8% (60 of 208 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.99 · 25.0% (52 of 208 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.99 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.99 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.98 · 33.7% (70 of 208 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.97 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Phyrexian Delver relevance 0.94 · 18.3% (38 of 208 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.94 · 24.0% (50 of 208 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.93 · 37.5% (78 of 208 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.91 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.89 · 35.6% (74 of 208 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.86 · 44.2% (92 of 208 decks)
- Sire of Stagnation relevance 0.86 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.81 · 12.0% (25 of 208 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.80 · 21.2% (44 of 208 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.79 · 36.1% (75 of 208 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.78 · 14.4% (30 of 208 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.78 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.78 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Gonti, Lord of Luxury relevance 0.75 · 19.7% (41 of 208 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.74 · 15.9% (33 of 208 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.74 · 33.2% (69 of 208 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 0.73 · 20.7% (43 of 208 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.69 · 19.2% (40 of 208 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.67 · 26.9% (56 of 208 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Panharmonicon relevance 1.37 · 45.2% (94 of 208 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.20 · 30.3% (63 of 208 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.07 · 25.5% (53 of 208 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.80 · 19.2% (40 of 208 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.73 · 31.7% (66 of 208 decks)
All instants (5)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 1.45 · 41.3% (86 of 208 decks)
- Displace relevance 1.23 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.82 · 20.2% (42 of 208 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.81 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.72 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
EDH data for Wild Pair: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 208 real decks.