Oakhame Adversary
Played in 5,539 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
45.6% Green
3030+37+3+1+1+6+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 4.60 · 50.0% (4,263 of 8,522 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.47 · 17.6% (51 of 290 decks)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 1.34 · 16.1% (42 of 261 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.22 · 11.5% (53 of 461 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.02 · 5.0% (210 of 4,192 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.95 · 6.4% (69 of 1,073 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.91 · 5.5% (87 of 1,569 decks)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.84 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.80 · 5.0% (67 of 1,345 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.74 · 8.6% (16 of 185 decks)
- Gorm the Great relevance 0.66 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (6 of 54 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.45 · 3.7% (16 of 430 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (27 of 976 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.40 · 2.4% (33 of 1,390 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (3 of 33 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (8 of 194 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (5 of 94 decks)
- Six relevance 0.27 · 1.5% (28 of 1,856 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 145 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.26 · 1.6% (20 of 1,251 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (3 of 65 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.24 · 1.2% (37 of 3,076 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Doorman relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Varis, Silverymoon Ranger relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (6 of 288 decks)
- Old One Eye relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (4 of 154 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Thrun, Breaker of Silence relevance 0.19 · 1.2% (15 of 1,237 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wasteland Viper relevance 2.10 · 60.3% (3,339 of 5,539 decks)
- Gnarlwood Dryad relevance 2.08 · 58.0% (3,214 of 5,539 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 1.97 · 61.7% (3,419 of 5,539 decks)
- Narnam Renegade relevance 1.97 · 52.7% (2,921 of 5,539 decks)
- Moss Viper relevance 1.95 · 57.1% (3,161 of 5,539 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 1.94 · 61.3% (3,396 of 5,539 decks)
- Tajuru Blightblade relevance 1.91 · 55.2% (3,060 of 5,539 decks)
- Sedge Scorpion relevance 1.90 · 54.3% (3,005 of 5,539 decks)
- Fang of Shigeki relevance 1.90 · 56.5% (3,130 of 5,539 decks)
- Ichorspit Basilisk relevance 1.87 · 52.8% (2,926 of 5,539 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 1.86 · 54.9% (3,040 of 5,539 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 1.82 · 57.8% (3,201 of 5,539 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 1.82 · 53.9% (2,987 of 5,539 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.77 · 53.1% (2,941 of 5,539 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 1.77 · 60.2% (3,334 of 5,539 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 1.75 · 56.2% (3,113 of 5,539 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 1.75 · 52.3% (2,896 of 5,539 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 1.72 · 52.5% (2,907 of 5,539 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 1.69 · 54.0% (2,990 of 5,539 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 1.65 · 50.9% (2,818 of 5,539 decks)
- Ankle Biter relevance 1.64 · 48.1% (2,665 of 5,539 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 1.63 · 45.1% (2,497 of 5,539 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 1.49 · 38.7% (2,142 of 5,539 decks)
- Hornet Nest relevance 1.44 · 40.8% (2,261 of 5,539 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.40 · 49.1% (2,722 of 5,539 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 1.39 · 49.8% (2,760 of 5,539 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 1.36 · 62.4% (3,457 of 5,539 decks)
- Contaminant Grafter relevance 1.34 · 34.4% (1,908 of 5,539 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 1.27 · 33.3% (1,842 of 5,539 decks)
- Planewide Celebration relevance 1.26 · 30.9% (1,711 of 5,539 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Wasteland Viper relevance 2.10 · 60.3% (3,339 of 5,539 decks)
- Gnarlwood Dryad relevance 2.08 · 58.0% (3,214 of 5,539 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 1.97 · 61.7% (3,419 of 5,539 decks)
- Narnam Renegade relevance 1.97 · 52.7% (2,921 of 5,539 decks)
- Moss Viper relevance 1.95 · 57.1% (3,161 of 5,539 decks)
- Tajuru Blightblade relevance 1.91 · 55.2% (3,060 of 5,539 decks)
- Sedge Scorpion relevance 1.90 · 54.3% (3,005 of 5,539 decks)
- Fang of Shigeki relevance 1.90 · 56.5% (3,130 of 5,539 decks)
- Ichorspit Basilisk relevance 1.87 · 52.8% (2,926 of 5,539 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 1.86 · 54.9% (3,040 of 5,539 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 1.82 · 57.8% (3,201 of 5,539 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 1.82 · 53.9% (2,987 of 5,539 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.77 · 53.1% (2,941 of 5,539 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 1.77 · 60.2% (3,334 of 5,539 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 1.75 · 56.2% (3,113 of 5,539 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 1.75 · 52.3% (2,896 of 5,539 decks)
- Ankle Biter relevance 1.64 · 48.1% (2,665 of 5,539 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 1.63 · 45.1% (2,497 of 5,539 decks)
- Hornet Nest relevance 1.44 · 40.8% (2,261 of 5,539 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.40 · 49.1% (2,722 of 5,539 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 1.39 · 49.8% (2,760 of 5,539 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 1.36 · 62.4% (3,457 of 5,539 decks)
- Contaminant Grafter relevance 1.34 · 34.4% (1,908 of 5,539 decks)
- Kappa Tech-Wrecker relevance 1.26 · 29.8% (1,651 of 5,539 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 1.23 · 36.9% (2,045 of 5,539 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 1.21 · 30.8% (1,706 of 5,539 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 1.16 · 40.7% (2,254 of 5,539 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 1.14 · 30.7% (1,703 of 5,539 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.12 · 44.9% (2,487 of 5,539 decks)
- Skullwinder relevance 1.08 · 28.4% (1,575 of 5,539 decks)
- Toxic Scorpion relevance 1.04 · 24.1% (1,337 of 5,539 decks)
- Flesh Burrower relevance 1.00 · 24.4% (1,350 of 5,539 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.99 · 54.4% (3,015 of 5,539 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.96 · 27.1% (1,503 of 5,539 decks)
- Phyrexian Swarmlord relevance 0.92 · 21.4% (1,185 of 5,539 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 0.90 · 20.9% (1,157 of 5,539 decks)
- Gran Pulse Ochu relevance 0.88 · 21.4% (1,186 of 5,539 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 1.49 · 38.7% (2,142 of 5,539 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 1.16 · 27.5% (1,525 of 5,539 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.89 · 19.6% (1,086 of 5,539 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Rancor relevance 0.84 · 33.2% (1,841 of 5,539 decks)
All instants (1)
- Infectious Bite relevance 1.94 · 61.3% (3,396 of 5,539 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Smell Fear relevance 1.72 · 52.5% (2,907 of 5,539 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 1.69 · 54.0% (2,990 of 5,539 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 1.65 · 50.9% (2,818 of 5,539 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 1.27 · 33.3% (1,842 of 5,539 decks)
- Planewide Celebration relevance 1.26 · 30.9% (1,711 of 5,539 decks)
- Noxious Assault relevance 1.20 · 29.3% (1,622 of 5,539 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Access Tunnel relevance 1.63 · 47.2% (2,614 of 5,539 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 1.34 · 51.5% (2,853 of 5,539 decks)
EDH data for Oakhame Adversary: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,539 real decks.
































































