Oakhame Adversary
Played in 577 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
4.7% Sultai
All commanders (5)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 2.67 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Felix Five-Boots relevance 2.09 · 2.9% (80 of 2,737 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 1.20 · 1.2% (37 of 3,039 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.77 · 1.1% (11 of 1,032 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.49 · 2.5% (2 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (173 of 577 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.76 · 51.8% (299 of 577 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.69 · 39.2% (226 of 577 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.62 · 28.2% (163 of 577 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.61 · 26.9% (155 of 577 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.60 · 26.5% (153 of 577 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.58 · 26.7% (154 of 577 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.57 · 29.6% (171 of 577 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.57 · 24.1% (139 of 577 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.57 · 23.2% (134 of 577 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.54 · 19.1% (110 of 577 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (87 of 577 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.52 · 22.4% (129 of 577 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.52 · 15.6% (90 of 577 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.52 · 16.8% (97 of 577 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (74 of 577 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.50 · 12.8% (74 of 577 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (89 of 577 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (89 of 577 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (99 of 577 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.49 · 12.3% (71 of 577 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.49 · 11.6% (67 of 577 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.48 · 12.3% (71 of 577 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.48 · 22.2% (128 of 577 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.47 · 12.5% (72 of 577 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (78 of 577 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (57 of 577 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.46 · 19.2% (111 of 577 decks)
- Archpriest of Shadows relevance 0.45 · 9.7% (56 of 577 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.45 · 10.6% (61 of 577 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.84 · 30.0% (173 of 577 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.76 · 51.8% (299 of 577 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.69 · 39.2% (226 of 577 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.62 · 28.2% (163 of 577 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.61 · 26.9% (155 of 577 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.60 · 26.5% (153 of 577 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.58 · 26.7% (154 of 577 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.57 · 24.1% (139 of 577 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.57 · 23.2% (134 of 577 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.54 · 19.1% (110 of 577 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.52 · 22.4% (129 of 577 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.52 · 15.6% (90 of 577 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.52 · 16.8% (97 of 577 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.50 · 12.8% (74 of 577 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (89 of 577 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (89 of 577 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.49 · 12.3% (71 of 577 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.48 · 12.3% (71 of 577 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (78 of 577 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (57 of 577 decks)
- Archpriest of Shadows relevance 0.45 · 9.7% (56 of 577 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.44 · 16.8% (97 of 577 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.44 · 14.0% (81 of 577 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.44 · 18.9% (109 of 577 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.44 · 16.5% (95 of 577 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (71 of 577 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.41 · 9.2% (53 of 577 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.40 · 13.5% (78 of 577 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (71 of 577 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (64 of 577 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (87 of 577 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.48 · 22.2% (128 of 577 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.41 · 14.2% (82 of 577 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (74 of 577 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.42 · 9.5% (55 of 577 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (79 of 577 decks)
All instants (9)
- Negate relevance 0.57 · 29.6% (171 of 577 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (99 of 577 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.49 · 11.6% (67 of 577 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.47 · 12.5% (72 of 577 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.46 · 19.2% (111 of 577 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.45 · 10.6% (61 of 577 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.45 · 11.8% (68 of 577 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.43 · 13.2% (76 of 577 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.40 · 8.1% (47 of 577 decks)
All lands (5)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.50 · 37.6% (217 of 577 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.41 · 19.8% (114 of 577 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.40 · 14.0% (81 of 577 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.39 · 27.4% (158 of 577 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.39 · 12.8% (74 of 577 decks)
EDH data for Oakhame Adversary: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 577 real decks.