Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50All top picks (50)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.64 · 60.4% (169 of 280 decks)
- Scattershot Archer relevance 0.77 · 33.2% (93 of 280 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.65 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.52 · 39.6% (111 of 280 decks)
- Endbringer relevance 0.61 · 21.4% (60 of 280 decks)
- Oak Street Innkeeper relevance 0.60 · 19.3% (54 of 280 decks)
- Hercules, Prince of Power relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (28 of 280 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.58 · 15.4% (43 of 280 decks)
- Master of the Wild Hunt relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.53 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Mjölnir, Storm Hammer relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Powerful Broker relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (32 of 280 decks)
- Pathway Arrows relevance 0.61 · 8.2% (23 of 280 decks)
- Tranquil Frillback relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (42 of 280 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.42 · 28.9% (81 of 280 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.48 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Spawnwrithe relevance 0.57 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 0.42 · 16.4% (46 of 280 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.42 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (41 of 280 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (32 of 280 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.40 · 17.9% (50 of 280 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (33 of 280 decks)
- Zimone's Experiment relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.34 · 26.8% (75 of 280 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.40 · 12.9% (36 of 280 decks)
- Oakhame Adversary relevance 0.37 · 17.9% (50 of 280 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (29 of 280 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.33 · 27.1% (76 of 280 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.37 · 14.6% (41 of 280 decks)
- Matsu-Tribe Sniper relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.35 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (31 of 280 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.30 · 31.8% (89 of 280 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.24 · 53.2% (149 of 280 decks)
- Patron of the Orochi relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (35 of 280 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.41 · 6.4% (18 of 280 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.40 · 7.5% (21 of 280 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.42 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.32 · 19.6% (55 of 280 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.32 · 16.8% (47 of 280 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.32 · 16.8% (47 of 280 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.36 · 9.6% (27 of 280 decks)
- Old-Growth Troll relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.36 · 9.6% (27 of 280 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.23 · 44.6% (125 of 280 decks)
Card Stacks
12
Card Stacks
12
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 All creatures (50)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.64 · 60.4% (169 of 280 decks)
- Scattershot Archer relevance 0.77 · 33.2% (93 of 280 decks)
- Endbringer relevance 0.61 · 21.4% (60 of 280 decks)
- Oak Street Innkeeper relevance 0.60 · 19.3% (54 of 280 decks)
- Hercules, Prince of Power relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (28 of 280 decks)
- Master of the Wild Hunt relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.53 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Powerful Broker relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (32 of 280 decks)
- Tranquil Frillback relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (42 of 280 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.42 · 28.9% (81 of 280 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.48 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Spawnwrithe relevance 0.57 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 0.42 · 16.4% (46 of 280 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.40 · 17.9% (50 of 280 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.34 · 26.8% (75 of 280 decks)
- Oakhame Adversary relevance 0.37 · 17.9% (50 of 280 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.33 · 27.1% (76 of 280 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.37 · 14.6% (41 of 280 decks)
- Matsu-Tribe Sniper relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.35 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.30 · 31.8% (89 of 280 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.24 · 53.2% (149 of 280 decks)
- Patron of the Orochi relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.40 · 7.5% (21 of 280 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.32 · 19.6% (55 of 280 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.32 · 16.8% (47 of 280 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.36 · 9.6% (27 of 280 decks)
- Old-Growth Troll relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 0.36 · 9.6% (27 of 280 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.23 · 44.6% (125 of 280 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.32 · 13.9% (39 of 280 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.35 · 10.0% (28 of 280 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (26 of 280 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.29 · 22.9% (64 of 280 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.37 · 6.4% (18 of 280 decks)
- Aberrant Manawurm relevance 0.44 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (33 of 280 decks)
- Nylea, God of the Hunt relevance 0.32 · 12.1% (34 of 280 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.32 · 12.9% (36 of 280 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.29 · 18.6% (52 of 280 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.33 · 11.4% (32 of 280 decks)
- Doomskar Warrior relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (28 of 280 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.28 · 16.8% (47 of 280 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
Artifacts
39
Artifacts
39 All artifacts (39)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.65 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.52 · 39.6% (111 of 280 decks)
- Mjölnir, Storm Hammer relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Pathway Arrows relevance 0.61 · 8.2% (23 of 280 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.42 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.42 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.26 · 16.8% (47 of 280 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.23 · 23.6% (66 of 280 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (26 of 280 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.23 · 10.4% (29 of 280 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (23 of 280 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 30.0% (84 of 280 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (60 of 280 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (13 of 280 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (56 of 280 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (31 of 280 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.10 · 27.1% (76 of 280 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.14 · 6.1% (17 of 280 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 58.9% (165 of 280 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 All enchantments (50)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.58 · 15.4% (43 of 280 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.42 · 14.6% (41 of 280 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.40 · 12.9% (36 of 280 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (29 of 280 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (31 of 280 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (35 of 280 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Family's Favor relevance 0.36 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (35 of 280 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.26 · 22.1% (62 of 280 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (24 of 280 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (13 of 280 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.21 · 18.6% (52 of 280 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.25 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.20 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.19 · 18.9% (53 of 280 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.17 · 25.4% (71 of 280 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.18 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (34 of 280 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.21 · 9.6% (27 of 280 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.16 · 26.1% (73 of 280 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.22 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.21 · 6.1% (17 of 280 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.12 · 43.9% (123 of 280 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.19 · 6.4% (18 of 280 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Bonds of Mortality relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 All instants (50)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (33 of 280 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.41 · 6.4% (18 of 280 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.32 · 16.8% (47 of 280 decks)
- Lumaret's Favor relevance 0.47 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.32 · 13.2% (37 of 280 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.31 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.25 · 23.2% (65 of 280 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.20 · 38.9% (109 of 280 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (70 of 280 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.26 · 12.1% (34 of 280 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.22 · 18.9% (53 of 280 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.22 · 19.6% (55 of 280 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.21 · 20.7% (58 of 280 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (21 of 280 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.21 · 13.2% (37 of 280 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.18 · 26.1% (73 of 280 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.19 · 13.9% (39 of 280 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (56 of 280 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.18 · 18.9% (53 of 280 decks)
- Efflorescence relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.17 · 13.9% (39 of 280 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (21 of 280 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.15 · 13.9% (39 of 280 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Winds of Qal Sisma relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (80 of 280 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (43 of 280 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 All sorceries (50)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (32 of 280 decks)
- Zimone's Experiment relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Chelonian Tackle relevance 0.41 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Follow the Lumarets relevance 0.40 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (28 of 280 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (52 of 280 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (35 of 280 decks)
- Revenge of the Hunted relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (15 of 280 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (32 of 280 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.17 · 23.9% (67 of 280 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.18 · 18.2% (51 of 280 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (18 of 280 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.16 · 11.8% (33 of 280 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 28.9% (81 of 280 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (9 of 280 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (32 of 280 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (13 of 280 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.16 · 9.6% (27 of 280 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (26 of 280 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.13 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.15 · 10.4% (29 of 280 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (80 of 280 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 16.1% (45 of 280 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.10 · 38.2% (107 of 280 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
Planeswalkers
6
Planeswalkers
6 All planeswalkers (6)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.30 · 11.8% (33 of 280 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.25 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.22 · 8.9% (25 of 280 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
Utility Lands
37
Utility Lands
37 All utility lands (37)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.27 · 19.3% (54 of 280 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (42 of 280 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (31 of 280 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.21 · 18.2% (51 of 280 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.26 · 6.4% (18 of 280 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 17.5% (49 of 280 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (20 of 280 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.18 · 24.6% (69 of 280 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (56 of 280 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (26 of 280 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.19 · 7.5% (21 of 280 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.17 · 13.6% (38 of 280 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.15 · 23.9% (67 of 280 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (56 of 280 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.13 · 31.4% (88 of 280 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (14 of 280 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 16.8% (47 of 280 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 13.6% (38 of 280 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (17 of 280 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.12 · 7.9% (22 of 280 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
Lands
19
Lands
19 All lands (19)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.23 · 18.6% (52 of 280 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.21 · 16.1% (45 of 280 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (22 of 280 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (30 of 280 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.15 · 19.3% (54 of 280 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (12 of 280 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (19 of 280 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (16 of 280 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (10 of 280 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 3.9% (11 of 280 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (8 of 280 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (7 of 280 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 90.7% (254 of 280 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Saryth, the Viper's Fang, from 280 real Commander decks.























































































































































































































































































































