Oakhame Adversary
Played in 308 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (12)
- Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 2.00 · 1.1% (106 of 9,706 decks)
- Marisi, Breaker of the Coil relevance 1.79 · 1.3% (51 of 4,024 decks)
- Aragorn, Hornburg Hero relevance 1.54 · 1.5% (24 of 1,653 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 1.15 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 1.06 · 2.8% (5 of 179 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.86 · 7.7% (2 of 26 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Ignacio of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.78 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.68 · 1.6% (3 of 192 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.63 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.61 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Johan relevance 0.51 · 1.3% (2 of 150 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.31 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.14 · 48.7% (150 of 308 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.07 · 55.8% (172 of 308 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.00 · 29.2% (90 of 308 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.98 · 29.5% (91 of 308 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.94 · 27.3% (84 of 308 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.93 · 36.7% (113 of 308 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.93 · 33.8% (104 of 308 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.82 · 28.9% (89 of 308 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.81 · 28.9% (89 of 308 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.78 · 21.1% (65 of 308 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.76 · 21.4% (66 of 308 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.73 · 19.5% (60 of 308 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (54 of 308 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.64 · 27.9% (86 of 308 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (42 of 308 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.60 · 14.6% (45 of 308 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.58 · 13.3% (41 of 308 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (44 of 308 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.57 · 19.8% (61 of 308 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (42 of 308 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.57 · 12.7% (39 of 308 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.56 · 10.4% (32 of 308 decks)
- Selfless Spirit relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (44 of 308 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.54 · 13.3% (41 of 308 decks)
- Grand Warlord Radha relevance 0.52 · 11.0% (34 of 308 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.51 · 21.8% (67 of 308 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (45 of 308 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (24 of 308 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (30 of 308 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.50 · 19.8% (61 of 308 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.14 · 48.7% (150 of 308 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.07 · 55.8% (172 of 308 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.00 · 29.2% (90 of 308 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.98 · 29.5% (91 of 308 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.94 · 27.3% (84 of 308 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.93 · 36.7% (113 of 308 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.93 · 33.8% (104 of 308 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.82 · 28.9% (89 of 308 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.81 · 28.9% (89 of 308 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.78 · 21.1% (65 of 308 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.76 · 21.4% (66 of 308 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.73 · 19.5% (60 of 308 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (54 of 308 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.64 · 27.9% (86 of 308 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (42 of 308 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.60 · 14.6% (45 of 308 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.58 · 13.3% (41 of 308 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (44 of 308 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.57 · 19.8% (61 of 308 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (42 of 308 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.57 · 12.7% (39 of 308 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.56 · 10.4% (32 of 308 decks)
- Selfless Spirit relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (44 of 308 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.54 · 13.3% (41 of 308 decks)
- Grand Warlord Radha relevance 0.52 · 11.0% (34 of 308 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (45 of 308 decks)
- Deathbloom Gardener relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (24 of 308 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (30 of 308 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.50 · 19.8% (61 of 308 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (45 of 308 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (41 of 308 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.49 · 20.5% (63 of 308 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.48 · 7.5% (23 of 308 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (29 of 308 decks)
- Soltari Visionary relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (29 of 308 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.46 · 11.4% (35 of 308 decks)
- Nightshade Dryad relevance 0.45 · 8.4% (26 of 308 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (21 of 308 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.45 · 13.6% (42 of 308 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (23 of 308 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (25 of 308 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.44 · 10.7% (33 of 308 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.43 · 15.9% (49 of 308 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.46 · 34.7% (107 of 308 decks)
- Rising of the Day relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (41 of 308 decks)
All instants (4)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.51 · 21.8% (67 of 308 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.49 · 12.3% (38 of 308 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.47 · 34.7% (107 of 308 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.45 · 13.6% (42 of 308 decks)
All lands (1)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.54 · 31.8% (98 of 308 decks)
EDH data for Oakhame Adversary: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 308 real decks.