Terramorph
Played in 300 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
930+13+2+2+18+1+7+7+
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Katilda, Dawnhart Prime relevance 2.45 · 4.1% (57 of 1,374 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.88 · 1.3% (8 of 613 decks)
- Fluttershy relevance 0.74 · 2.8% (3 of 107 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.64 · 1.9% (3 of 158 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist relevance 0.63 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel relevance 0.62 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Veteran Soldier relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Rasaad yn Bashir relevance 0.31 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Black Panther, Vanguard relevance 0.25 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.30 · 23.3% (70 of 300 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 1.29 · 23.7% (71 of 300 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 1.28 · 28.7% (86 of 300 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 1.26 · 26.0% (78 of 300 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 1.16 · 27.0% (81 of 300 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 1.14 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 1.11 · 19.7% (59 of 300 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (49 of 300 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.86 · 27.0% (81 of 300 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.85 · 16.3% (49 of 300 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.84 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.54 · 16.0% (48 of 300 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.51 · 8.7% (26 of 300 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.51 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Natural Connection relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.45 · 34.7% (104 of 300 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.44 · 27.3% (82 of 300 decks)
- Luminate Primordial relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.43 · 20.0% (60 of 300 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.42 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (26 of 300 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.41 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.41 · 16.3% (49 of 300 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.41 · 10.0% (30 of 300 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (37 of 300 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (31 of 300 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.51 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Luminate Primordial relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.41 · 16.3% (49 of 300 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.41 · 10.0% (30 of 300 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (37 of 300 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Protector of the Wastes relevance 0.37 · 6.0% (18 of 300 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Torsten, Founder of Benalia relevance 0.35 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.84 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.43 · 20.0% (60 of 300 decks)
All instants (2)
- Natural Connection relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.35 · 15.0% (45 of 300 decks)
All sorceries (18)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.30 · 23.3% (70 of 300 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 1.29 · 23.7% (71 of 300 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 1.28 · 28.7% (86 of 300 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 1.26 · 26.0% (78 of 300 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 1.16 · 27.0% (81 of 300 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 1.14 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 1.11 · 19.7% (59 of 300 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.86 · 27.0% (81 of 300 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.85 · 16.3% (49 of 300 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.54 · 16.0% (48 of 300 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.51 · 8.7% (26 of 300 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.45 · 34.7% (104 of 300 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.44 · 27.3% (82 of 300 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.42 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (26 of 300 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.41 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (31 of 300 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.34 · 13.0% (39 of 300 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (49 of 300 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (69 of 300 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.39 · 13.7% (41 of 300 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.37 · 16.0% (48 of 300 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.37 · 16.0% (48 of 300 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Grove of the Guardian relevance 0.36 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
All lands (7)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.60 · 20.7% (62 of 300 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.48 · 21.0% (63 of 300 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.44 · 24.7% (74 of 300 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.44 · 28.7% (86 of 300 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.41 · 31.0% (93 of 300 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.41 · 10.7% (32 of 300 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (60 of 300 decks)
EDH data for Terramorph: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 300 real decks.
































































