Phial of Galadriel
Played in 894 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
4.5% Temur
-
Grixis 3,015 · 15.2%
-
Red 1,772 · 8.9%
-
Boros 1,418 · 7.1%
-
Izzet 1,116 · 5.6%
-
White 1,035 · 5.2%
-
Rakdos 1,024 · 5.2%
-
Orzhov 1,000 · 5.0%
-
Temur 894 · 4.5%
-
Five-Color 780 · 3.9%
-
Black 755 · 3.8%
-
Esper 693 · 3.5%
-
Ink-Treader 672 · 3.4%
-
Abzan 619 · 3.1%
-
Bant 585 · 2.9%
-
Azorius 576 · 2.9%
-
Mardu 516 · 2.6%
-
Colorless 438 · 2.2%
-
Selesnya 430 · 2.2%
-
Jeskai 400 · 2.0%
- Other (13) 2,139 · 10.8%
430+30+2+9+2+6+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.15 · 5.9% (698 of 11,822 decks)
- Lara Croft, Tomb Raider relevance 2.55 · 8.0% (117 of 1,454 decks)
- Dan Lewis // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.21 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Containment Construct relevance 1.99 · 57.6% (515 of 894 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 1.97 · 73.7% (659 of 894 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 1.75 · 54.6% (488 of 894 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 1.63 · 33.1% (296 of 894 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.57 · 32.3% (289 of 894 decks)
- Conspiracy Theorist relevance 1.56 · 34.7% (310 of 894 decks)
- Drake Haven relevance 1.51 · 25.7% (230 of 894 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 1.49 · 45.3% (405 of 894 decks)
- Abundance relevance 1.46 · 46.8% (418 of 894 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.34 · 42.7% (382 of 894 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.33 · 40.5% (362 of 894 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.29 · 47.2% (422 of 894 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 1.23 · 23.6% (211 of 894 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.21 · 36.7% (328 of 894 decks)
- Ancient Grudge relevance 1.16 · 27.7% (248 of 894 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 1.16 · 25.8% (231 of 894 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 1.15 · 25.4% (227 of 894 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 1.12 · 30.6% (274 of 894 decks)
- Ignite the Future relevance 1.07 · 20.5% (183 of 894 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 1.06 · 16.0% (143 of 894 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 1.04 · 40.5% (362 of 894 decks)
- Noose Constrictor relevance 1.03 · 19.6% (175 of 894 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.01 · 34.2% (306 of 894 decks)
- Wild Mongrel relevance 1.00 · 17.1% (153 of 894 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.00 · 47.1% (421 of 894 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.99 · 28.5% (255 of 894 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 0.97 · 22.1% (198 of 894 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.97 · 36.8% (329 of 894 decks)
- Case of the Crimson Pulse relevance 0.96 · 16.1% (144 of 894 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.96 · 19.0% (170 of 894 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Containment Construct relevance 1.99 · 57.6% (515 of 894 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 1.75 · 54.6% (488 of 894 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.57 · 32.3% (289 of 894 decks)
- Conspiracy Theorist relevance 1.56 · 34.7% (310 of 894 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.34 · 42.7% (382 of 894 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.33 · 40.5% (362 of 894 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.29 · 47.2% (422 of 894 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 1.16 · 25.8% (231 of 894 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 1.06 · 16.0% (143 of 894 decks)
- Noose Constrictor relevance 1.03 · 19.6% (175 of 894 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.01 · 34.2% (306 of 894 decks)
- Wild Mongrel relevance 1.00 · 17.1% (153 of 894 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 0.97 · 22.1% (198 of 894 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.97 · 36.8% (329 of 894 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.95 · 17.1% (153 of 894 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.94 · 24.7% (221 of 894 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.93 · 24.7% (221 of 894 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.93 · 15.3% (137 of 894 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.93 · 17.7% (158 of 894 decks)
- Aquamoeba relevance 0.92 · 15.4% (138 of 894 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.92 · 16.8% (150 of 894 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 30.8% (275 of 894 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.92 · 16.0% (143 of 894 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.91 · 26.4% (236 of 894 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.90 · 35.2% (315 of 894 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 36.0% (322 of 894 decks)
- Inti, Seneschal of the Sun relevance 0.90 · 21.6% (193 of 894 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.90 · 27.6% (247 of 894 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.90 · 20.8% (186 of 894 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 0.84 · 12.2% (109 of 894 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Bag of Holding relevance 1.63 · 33.1% (296 of 894 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 1.15 · 25.4% (227 of 894 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Song of Creation relevance 1.97 · 73.7% (659 of 894 decks)
- Drake Haven relevance 1.51 · 25.7% (230 of 894 decks)
- Abundance relevance 1.46 · 46.8% (418 of 894 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 1.23 · 23.6% (211 of 894 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.21 · 36.7% (328 of 894 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.99 · 28.5% (255 of 894 decks)
- Case of the Crimson Pulse relevance 0.96 · 16.1% (144 of 894 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.88 · 23.7% (212 of 894 decks)
- Outpost Siege relevance 0.83 · 14.9% (133 of 894 decks)
All instants (2)
- Ancient Grudge relevance 1.16 · 27.7% (248 of 894 decks)
- Commune with Lava relevance 0.86 · 15.5% (139 of 894 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Summer Bloom relevance 1.49 · 45.3% (405 of 894 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 1.12 · 30.6% (274 of 894 decks)
- Ignite the Future relevance 1.07 · 20.5% (183 of 894 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 1.04 · 40.5% (362 of 894 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.00 · 47.1% (421 of 894 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.96 · 19.0% (170 of 894 decks)
All lands (1)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.83 · 35.7% (319 of 894 decks)
EDH data for Phial of Galadriel: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 894 real decks.














































