Cards like Mana Reflection
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mana Reflection 29%
- Nyxbloom Ancient 18%
Cards like Vizier of Tumbling Sands
6.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands 21%
- Kiora's Follower 18%
- Kelpie Guide 7%
- Ioreth of the Healing House 7%
- Forensic Researcher 4%
Other options: Fatestitcher, North Pole Patrol
Cards like Urban Evolution
4.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Simic decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 39% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.3 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 46%
- Kodama's Reach 36%
- Rampant Growth 21%
- Search for Tomorrow 21%
- Migration Path 14%
- Traverse the Outlands 4%
- Grow from the Ashes 4%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Boundless Realms 4%
- Reshape the Earth 4%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Nissa's Expedition, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Shared Roots, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique, Harvest Season
Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 32%
- Llanowar Elves 32%
- Fyndhorn Elves 18%
- Boreal Druid 11%
- Rootrider Faun 4%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Pull from Tomorrow
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Apex Devastator
6.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Brainstorm
3.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 18%
- Brainsurge 11%
Cards like Stroke of Genius
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Stroke of Genius 21%
- Mind Spring 14%
- Silver Scrutiny 11%
- Fascination 4%
- Braingeyser 4%
- Prosperity 4%
Other options: Mathemagics, Skyscribing
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ravenform
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Ravenform 21%
- Alrund's Epiphany 7%
Cards like Finale of Revelation
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Teferi's Ageless Insight
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Voidslime
6.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like End-Raze Forerunners
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok, Earthshaker Giant
Cards like Wild Growth
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Market Festival, Dawn's Reflection, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Fertile Ground, Overgrowth
Cards like Counterspell
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 25%
- Negate 18%
- Essence Scatter 4%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Hydroid Krasis
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Gandalf, Shadow's Foe
Cards like Eureka Moment
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
All top picks (50)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.30 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.25 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.27 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.25 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.23 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.19 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.23 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Mind Unbound relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.23 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.18 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.19 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.20 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Diviner's Portent relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.17 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Ingenious Mastery relevance 0.23 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Even the Score relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.17 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Tishana, Voice of Thunder relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.17 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Trinisphere relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.19 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.17 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.17 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.30 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.27 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.25 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.23 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.19 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.23 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.23 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.20 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.17 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.17 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Tishana, Voice of Thunder relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.17 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Battery Bearer relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.16 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.15 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Yew Spirit relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Breaker of Armies relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Deepfathom Skulker relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Arachnus Spinner relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Trinisphere relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Gemstone Array relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Damping Engine relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Wine of Blood and Iron relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.13 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Thaumaton Torpedo relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Malachite Talisman relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bronze Cudgels relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Avarice Amulet relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Lapis Lazuli Talisman relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Gift relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Rod of Absorption relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Meteor Sword relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Charisma Bobblehead relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Endurance Bobblehead relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Perception Bobblehead relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Intelligence Bobblehead relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Strength Bobblehead relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Luck Bobblehead relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Thorn of Amethyst relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Agility Bobblehead relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Seal of the Guildpact relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Firemind Vessel relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kaldra Compleat relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Pinnacle Kill-Ship relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.25 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Mind Unbound relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Wild Pair relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.16 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Kumena's Awakening relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Thought Reflection relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.13 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- City of Solitude relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Honden of Seeing Winds relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Meishin, the Mind Cage relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Unbridled Growth relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Chakra Meditation relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sheltered Aerie relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Nature's Embrace relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- World War Hulk relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Feed the Pack relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Military Intelligence relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Blighted Burgeoning relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Weirding Wood relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Myth Unbound relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Glittering Frost relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All instants (50)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Diviner's Portent relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Even the Score relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.17 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.13 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Vine Snare relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Dismal Failure relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.14 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sudden Insight relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Crippling Chill relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Commander's Insight relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Twitch relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Gather Specimens relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Glimmerburst relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Slice in Twain relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Zuko's Exile relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.09 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Eldritch Immunity relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Applied Biomancy relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.18 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Ingenious Mastery relevance 0.23 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.19 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.17 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Silver Scrutiny relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.15 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.15 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Of One Mind relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Aether Helix relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.14 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Pull from the Deep relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Introduction to Annihilation relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Struggle for Skemfar relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Basic Conjuration relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Game Plan relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Healing Technique relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Long Rest relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Arcane Endeavor relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.08 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.10 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Fade into Antiquity relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Recollect relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Thunderous Debut relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.19 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.08 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.08 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.06 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.05 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.05 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.05 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All lands (48)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.15 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.11 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.09 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.09 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.09 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.07 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.07 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.08 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.07 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.06 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.05 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.05 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.07 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.05 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.05 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.04 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.05 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 85.7% (24 of 28 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 85.7% (24 of 28 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix, from 28 real Commander partner decks.