Cards like Elvish Archdruid
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
98% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
95% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
3.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Quirion Ranger
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
91% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other green decks
Cards
- Quirion Ranger 74%
- Arbor Elf 73%
- Scryb Ranger 21%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
98% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
95% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
3.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.5 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 95%
- Elvish Mystic 92%
- Fyndhorn Elves 85%
- Boreal Druid 45%
- Llanowar Tribe 33%
- Leaf Gilder 4%
- Druid of the Cowl 4%
- Wirewood Elf 2%
Other options: Fyndhorn Elder, Nantuko Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Lys Alana Huntmaster
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Priest of Titania
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Green Sun's Zenith
4.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Immaculate Magistrate
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri, Korvecdal
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Vizier of the Menagerie
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Warmaster 65%
- Wolverine Riders 26%
Cards like Elvish Visionary
9.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Shaman of Spring, Owlbear, Generous Stray, Pyknite, Kavu Climber, Striped Bears, Carven Caryatid, Arctic Wolves, Rhox Oracle, Wall of Blossoms
Cards like Beast Whisperer
6.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Champion
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Heritage Druid
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
- Heritage Druid 45%
- Birchlore Rangers 11%
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
3.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
5.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fauna Shaman
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Vanquisher's Banner
8.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Jagged-Scar Archers
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Essence Warden
4.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Social Climber, Greenhouse Propagator, Prosperous Innkeeper
Cards like Worldly Tutor
2.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 41%
- Sylvan Tutor 5%
Cards like Sol Ring
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other green decks
Cards like Vitalize
3.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
All top picks (50)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.31 · 82.0% (105 of 128 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.32 · 71.9% (92 of 128 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.30 · 74.2% (95 of 128 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.26 · 88.3% (113 of 128 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.33 · 61.7% (79 of 128 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.34 · 57.0% (73 of 128 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.28 · 72.7% (93 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.31 · 62.5% (80 of 128 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.30 · 64.1% (82 of 128 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.31 · 61.7% (79 of 128 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.36 · 43.8% (56 of 128 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.46 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.29 · 64.8% (83 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.30 · 58.6% (75 of 128 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.34 · 46.1% (59 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.22 · 94.5% (121 of 128 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.34 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.35 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.22 · 93.0% (119 of 128 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.33 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.23 · 78.9% (101 of 128 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.32 · 46.1% (59 of 128 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.36 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.29 · 57.8% (74 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.37 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 0.43 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.35 · 35.9% (46 of 128 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.31 · 46.1% (59 of 128 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.31 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.33 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.34 · 35.2% (45 of 128 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.33 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.34 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.38 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.34 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.31 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.37 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.33 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.36 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.29 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.32 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.29 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.30 · 43.0% (55 of 128 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.34 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.38 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.30 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.34 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.31 · 82.0% (105 of 128 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.32 · 71.9% (92 of 128 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.30 · 74.2% (95 of 128 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.26 · 88.3% (113 of 128 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.33 · 61.7% (79 of 128 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.28 · 72.7% (93 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.31 · 62.5% (80 of 128 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.30 · 64.1% (82 of 128 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.31 · 61.7% (79 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.29 · 64.8% (83 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.30 · 58.6% (75 of 128 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.34 · 46.1% (59 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.22 · 94.5% (121 of 128 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.34 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.35 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.22 · 93.0% (119 of 128 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.33 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.23 · 78.9% (101 of 128 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.32 · 46.1% (59 of 128 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.36 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.29 · 57.8% (74 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.37 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 0.43 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.31 · 46.1% (59 of 128 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.31 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.33 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.38 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.34 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.31 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.33 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.36 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.29 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.32 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.29 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.30 · 43.0% (55 of 128 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.34 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.30 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.34 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.37 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.22 · 68.8% (88 of 128 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.32 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.20 · 73.4% (94 of 128 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.31 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.33 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Beastrider Vanguard relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.33 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.30 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.35 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
All artifacts (45)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.34 · 57.0% (73 of 128 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.36 · 43.8% (56 of 128 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.38 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.37 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.30 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.36 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.26 · 19.5% (25 of 128 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.32 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.34 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.18 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Elven Bow relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Guac & Marshmallow Pizza relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.20 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.16 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Stoneforge Masterwork relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.10 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 72.7% (93 of 128 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.38 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.31 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Crown of Skemfar relevance 0.36 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.24 · 39.1% (50 of 128 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.30 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.21 · 43.8% (56 of 128 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.24 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.24 · 29.7% (38 of 128 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.25 · 19.5% (25 of 128 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.20 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.23 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.20 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Arboreal Alliance relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Song of Freyalise relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Spidersilk Armor relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.13 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
All instants (50)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.34 · 35.2% (45 of 128 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.33 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.37 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.38 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.27 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.32 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 0.41 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.32 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.25 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (32 of 128 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.33 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.27 · 28.1% (36 of 128 decks)
- Wirewood Pride relevance 0.34 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.27 · 19.5% (25 of 128 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.33 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.25 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Embiggen relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Witch's Web relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.22 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.19 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.14 · 57.8% (74 of 128 decks)
- Collected Company relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Tethermage's Advantage relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Might of Old Krosa relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Sudden Spinnerets relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Burst of Strength relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.10 · 61.7% (79 of 128 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- High Stride relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
All sorceries (47)
- Scale Up relevance 0.46 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.34 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.38 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.29 · 42.2% (54 of 128 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.37 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.27 · 46.9% (60 of 128 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.29 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.24 · 45.3% (58 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.30 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.27 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.21 · 44.5% (57 of 128 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Hunting Triad relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.20 · 30.5% (39 of 128 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.16 · 43.0% (55 of 128 decks)
- Celestial Reunion relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.21 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.17 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Bounty of Skemfar relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Whirlwind relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.11 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.10 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.11 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.35 · 35.9% (46 of 128 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.34 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Nissa Revane relevance 0.35 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.35 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
All utility lands (46)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.27 · 82.0% (105 of 128 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.23 · 57.0% (73 of 128 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.28 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.23 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.32 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.25 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.19 · 43.0% (55 of 128 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.29 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.27 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.20 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.22 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 19.5% (25 of 128 decks)
- Centaur Garden relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.16 · 28.9% (37 of 128 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.15 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.15 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
All lands (23)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.19 · 58.6% (75 of 128 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.29 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.26 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.19 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.18 · 35.2% (45 of 128 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.17 · 38.3% (49 of 128 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 96.9% (124 of 128 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Marwyn, the Nurturer, from 128 real Commander decks.