Multani's Acolyte

Played in 590 decks

Multani's Acolyte
$0.24 €0.70

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Abomination of Llanowar relevance 2.05 · 1.4% (17 of 1,184 decks)
  2. Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.03 · 1.8% (75 of 4,127 decks)
  3. Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 1.84 · 1.8% (48 of 2,604 decks)
  4. Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 1.56 · 3.3% (14 of 419 decks)
  5. Kaysa relevance 1.55 · 8.3% (7 of 84 decks)
  6. Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.51 · 1.8% (24 of 1,321 decks)
  7. Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 1.38 · 3.2% (4 of 125 decks)
  8. Asmira, Holy Avenger relevance 1.19 · 1.5% (4 of 274 decks)
  9. Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.18 · 2.6% (8 of 303 decks)
  10. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
  11. Multani, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.03 · 2.1% (7 of 334 decks)
  12. Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.00 · 1.1% (13 of 1,231 decks)
  13. Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.98 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
  14. Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 0.87 · 2.0% (5 of 254 decks)
  15. Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.86 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  16. Wolfsbane, Highland Hero relevance 0.84 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
  17. Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.77 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
  18. Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Far Traveler relevance 0.76 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
  19. Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.70 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
  20. Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.70 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
  21. Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.69 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
  22. Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.67 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
  23. Wilson, Refined Grizzly // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.66 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  24. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.64 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
  25. Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
  26. Tusk and Whiskers relevance 0.60 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
  27. Othelm, Sigardian Outcast relevance 0.57 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
  28. Melira, Sylvok Outcast relevance 0.49 · 1.6% (2 of 123 decks)
  29. Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
  30. Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.33 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Elvish Visionary
    3.43 68.5%
    $0.26 €5.76
  • Llanowar Visionary
    2.12 38.0%
    $0.32 €0.20
  • Quirion Ranger
    1.92 39.0%
    $2.14 €1.82
  • Priest of Titania
    1.86 47.6%
    $1.98 €0.96
  • Fyndhorn Elves
    1.82 58.0%
    $2.12 €3.31
  • Llanowar Elves
    1.68 72.7%
    $0.28 €0.21
  • Arbor Elf
    1.64 42.7%
    $0.86 €0.84
  • Birchlore Rangers
    1.63 23.7%
    $0.74 €0.62
  • Heart Warden
    1.55 19.8%
    $0.26 €0.22
  • Elvish Mystic
    1.52 58.8%
    $5.21 €4.86
All most relevant (30)
  1. Elvish Visionary relevance 3.43 · 68.5% (404 of 590 decks)
  2. Llanowar Visionary relevance 2.12 · 38.0% (224 of 590 decks)
  3. Quirion Ranger relevance 1.92 · 39.0% (230 of 590 decks)
  4. Priest of Titania relevance 1.86 · 47.6% (281 of 590 decks)
  5. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.82 · 58.0% (342 of 590 decks)
  6. Llanowar Elves relevance 1.68 · 72.7% (429 of 590 decks)
  7. Arbor Elf relevance 1.64 · 42.7% (252 of 590 decks)
  8. Birchlore Rangers relevance 1.63 · 23.7% (140 of 590 decks)
  9. Heart Warden relevance 1.55 · 19.8% (117 of 590 decks)
  10. Elvish Mystic relevance 1.52 · 58.8% (347 of 590 decks)
  11. Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.49 · 28.3% (167 of 590 decks)
  12. Reclamation Sage relevance 1.45 · 41.5% (245 of 590 decks)
  13. Yavimaya Granger relevance 1.42 · 17.6% (104 of 590 decks)
  14. Beast Whisperer relevance 1.42 · 44.4% (262 of 590 decks)
  15. Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.41 · 28.1% (166 of 590 decks)
  16. Wood Elves relevance 1.39 · 34.9% (206 of 590 decks)
  17. Boreal Druid relevance 1.26 · 25.1% (148 of 590 decks)
  18. Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.25 · 31.2% (184 of 590 decks)
  19. Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.15 · 20.8% (123 of 590 decks)
  20. Glimpse of Nature relevance 1.10 · 17.8% (105 of 590 decks)
  21. Wellwisher relevance 1.09 · 18.5% (109 of 590 decks)
  22. Wirewood Herald relevance 1.08 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
  23. Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.08 · 19.2% (113 of 590 decks)
  24. Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.05 · 15.8% (93 of 590 decks)
  25. Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.03 · 24.1% (142 of 590 decks)
  26. Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.02 · 18.1% (107 of 590 decks)
  27. Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.01 · 21.5% (127 of 590 decks)
  28. Elvish Guidance relevance 0.99 · 16.3% (96 of 590 decks)
  29. Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.98 · 20.2% (119 of 590 decks)
  30. Scryb Ranger relevance 0.97 · 16.4% (97 of 590 decks)

Creatures

44

Showing 1-10 of 44

Page size
  • Elvish Visionary
    3.43 68.5%
    $0.26 €5.76
  • Llanowar Visionary
    2.12 38.0%
    $0.32 €0.20
  • Quirion Ranger
    1.92 39.0%
    $2.14 €1.82
  • Priest of Titania
    1.86 47.6%
    $1.98 €0.96
  • Fyndhorn Elves
    1.82 58.0%
    $2.12 €3.31
  • Llanowar Elves
    1.68 72.7%
    $0.28 €0.21
  • Arbor Elf
    1.64 42.7%
    $0.86 €0.84
  • Birchlore Rangers
    1.63 23.7%
    $0.74 €0.62
  • Heart Warden
    1.55 19.8%
    $0.26 €0.22
  • Elvish Mystic
    1.52 58.8%
    $5.21 €4.86
All creatures (44)
  1. Elvish Visionary relevance 3.43 · 68.5% (404 of 590 decks)
  2. Llanowar Visionary relevance 2.12 · 38.0% (224 of 590 decks)
  3. Quirion Ranger relevance 1.92 · 39.0% (230 of 590 decks)
  4. Priest of Titania relevance 1.86 · 47.6% (281 of 590 decks)
  5. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.82 · 58.0% (342 of 590 decks)
  6. Llanowar Elves relevance 1.68 · 72.7% (429 of 590 decks)
  7. Arbor Elf relevance 1.64 · 42.7% (252 of 590 decks)
  8. Birchlore Rangers relevance 1.63 · 23.7% (140 of 590 decks)
  9. Heart Warden relevance 1.55 · 19.8% (117 of 590 decks)
  10. Elvish Mystic relevance 1.52 · 58.8% (347 of 590 decks)
  11. Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.49 · 28.3% (167 of 590 decks)
  12. Reclamation Sage relevance 1.45 · 41.5% (245 of 590 decks)
  13. Yavimaya Granger relevance 1.42 · 17.6% (104 of 590 decks)
  14. Beast Whisperer relevance 1.42 · 44.4% (262 of 590 decks)
  15. Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.41 · 28.1% (166 of 590 decks)
  16. Wood Elves relevance 1.39 · 34.9% (206 of 590 decks)
  17. Boreal Druid relevance 1.26 · 25.1% (148 of 590 decks)
  18. Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.25 · 31.2% (184 of 590 decks)
  19. Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.15 · 20.8% (123 of 590 decks)
  20. Wellwisher relevance 1.09 · 18.5% (109 of 590 decks)
  21. Wirewood Herald relevance 1.08 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
  22. Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.08 · 19.2% (113 of 590 decks)
  23. Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.05 · 15.8% (93 of 590 decks)
  24. Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.03 · 24.1% (142 of 590 decks)
  25. Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.02 · 18.1% (107 of 590 decks)
  26. Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.01 · 21.5% (127 of 590 decks)
  27. Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.98 · 20.2% (119 of 590 decks)
  28. Scryb Ranger relevance 0.97 · 16.4% (97 of 590 decks)
  29. Farhaven Elf relevance 0.96 · 20.7% (122 of 590 decks)
  30. Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.96 · 17.8% (105 of 590 decks)
  31. Elvish Lyrist relevance 0.94 · 11.7% (69 of 590 decks)
  32. Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.93 · 16.4% (97 of 590 decks)
  33. Eternal Witness relevance 0.92 · 33.2% (196 of 590 decks)
  34. Heritage Druid relevance 0.92 · 15.8% (93 of 590 decks)
  35. Fauna Shaman relevance 0.91 · 20.3% (120 of 590 decks)
  36. Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.90 · 15.1% (89 of 590 decks)
  37. Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (102 of 590 decks)
  38. Fierce Empath relevance 0.81 · 16.3% (96 of 590 decks)
  39. Elvish Champion relevance 0.81 · 15.4% (91 of 590 decks)
  40. Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.79 · 10.7% (63 of 590 decks)
  41. Regal Force relevance 0.77 · 13.9% (82 of 590 decks)
  42. Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.76 · 11.0% (65 of 590 decks)
  43. Taunting Elf relevance 0.76 · 11.0% (65 of 590 decks)
  44. Imperious Perfect relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (101 of 590 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Elvish Guidance
    0.99 16.3%
    $0.87 €0.63
  • Concordant Crossroads
    0.97 21.0%
    $42.33 €23.71
  • Gaea's Touch
    0.75 11.0%
    $2.69 €3.44
All enchantments (3)
  1. Elvish Guidance relevance 0.99 · 16.3% (96 of 590 decks)
  2. Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.97 · 21.0% (124 of 590 decks)
  3. Gaea's Touch relevance 0.75 · 11.0% (65 of 590 decks)

Instants

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Vitalize
    0.91 16.6%
    $1.23 €1.06
All instants (1)
  1. Vitalize relevance 0.91 · 16.6% (98 of 590 decks)

Sorceries

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Glimpse of Nature
    1.10 17.8%
    $9.01 €4.74
All sorceries (1)
  1. Glimpse of Nature relevance 1.10 · 17.8% (105 of 590 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Wirewood Lodge
    1.23 24.7%
    $12.25 €7.62
All utility lands (1)
  1. Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.23 · 24.7% (146 of 590 decks)

EDH data for Multani's Acolyte: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 590 real decks.