Cards like Doran, the Siege Tower
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Abzan decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Streetwise Negotiator
Cards like Tree of Perdition
5.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Abzan decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Wall of Blossoms
3.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Abzan decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Abzan decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Wall of Blossoms 47%
- Wall of Omens 42%
- Carven Caryatid 10%
Other options: Owlbear, Gallant Citizen, Kindly Customer, Salt Road Packbeast, Generous Stray, Roving Harper, Joraga Visionary, Pyknite, Kavu Climber, Spirited Companion, Striped Bears, Shaman of Spring, Helpful Hunter, Elvish Visionary, Arctic Wolves, Multani's Acolyte, Rhox Oracle, Llanowar Visionary
Cards like Cultivate
1.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Abzan decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 23% of other Abzan decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.80 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Cultivate 41%
- Rampant Growth 40%
- Kodama's Reach 26%
- Shared Roots 12%
- Explosive Vegetation 2%
- Roamer's Routine 1%
Other options: Traverse the Outlands, Terramorph, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, Harvest Season, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Search for Tomorrow, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Migration Path, Celebrate the Harvest, Boundless Realms, New Generation's Technique, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Fell the Mighty
6.1× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Abzan decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Slaughter the Strong
12× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Abzan decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Overgrown Battlement
1.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Abzan decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Baldin, Century Herdmaster
15× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Abzan decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Abzan decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 40%
- Three Visits 23%
- Skyshroud Claim 4%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Glimpse the Core, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Bedrock Tortoise
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Reaping Willow
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Selesnya Signet
1.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Abzan decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Selesnya Signet 16%
- Orzhov Signet 12%
- Golgari Signet 7%
Cards like Great Forest Druid
17× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Infernal Grasp
1.5× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Abzan decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
3.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Oakhame Adversary, Ohran Viper, Keeper of Fables
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Abzan decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 26%
- Lightning Greaves 24%
Cards like Treefolk Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Indomitable Ancients
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Ironclad Krovod, Pillarfield Ox, Silent Artisan, Kami of Old Stone, Dutiful Servants, Great Hart, Imperial Outrider, Great-Horn Krushok, Siege Mastodon
Cards like Arbor Adherent
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Abzan decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Faeburrow Elder
1.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Faeburrow Elder 48%
- Bloom Tender 7%
Cards like Welcoming Vampire
2.1× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Abzan decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.39 · 46.2% (114 of 247 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.45 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Treebeard, Gracious Host relevance 0.41 · 33.2% (82 of 247 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.46 · 19.4% (48 of 247 decks)
- Blighted Blackthorn relevance 0.48 · 15.4% (38 of 247 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 0.36 · 44.5% (110 of 247 decks)
- Felothar the Steadfast relevance 0.24 · 83.4% (206 of 247 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 0.43 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Moonlit Lamenter relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (39 of 247 decks)
- Sinister Gnarlbark relevance 0.42 · 26.7% (66 of 247 decks)
- Ancient Lumberknot relevance 0.30 · 58.7% (145 of 247 decks)
- Bark of Doran relevance 0.42 · 27.1% (67 of 247 decks)
- Reaping Willow relevance 0.44 · 22.3% (55 of 247 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.44 · 20.6% (51 of 247 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.45 · 17.8% (44 of 247 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.45 · 16.6% (41 of 247 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (34 of 247 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.42 · 19.4% (48 of 247 decks)
- Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (35 of 247 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 0.42 · 16.6% (41 of 247 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (37 of 247 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (32 of 247 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.45 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 0.44 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.43 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Black Poplar Shaman relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.20 · 80.2% (198 of 247 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.31 · 35.2% (87 of 247 decks)
- Nemata, Primeval Warden relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.40 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.41 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.44 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.33 · 21.5% (53 of 247 decks)
- The Kingpin of Crime relevance 0.41 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Colfenor, the Last Yew relevance 0.23 · 54.7% (135 of 247 decks)
- Essence of Antiquity relevance 0.34 · 18.2% (45 of 247 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Six relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.30 · 26.3% (65 of 247 decks)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Unhallowed Phalanx relevance 0.30 · 24.3% (60 of 247 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 0.33 · 14.2% (35 of 247 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.39 · 46.2% (114 of 247 decks)
- Treebeard, Gracious Host relevance 0.41 · 33.2% (82 of 247 decks)
- Blighted Blackthorn relevance 0.48 · 15.4% (38 of 247 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 0.36 · 44.5% (110 of 247 decks)
- Felothar the Steadfast relevance 0.24 · 83.4% (206 of 247 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 0.43 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Moonlit Lamenter relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (39 of 247 decks)
- Sinister Gnarlbark relevance 0.42 · 26.7% (66 of 247 decks)
- Ancient Lumberknot relevance 0.30 · 58.7% (145 of 247 decks)
- Reaping Willow relevance 0.44 · 22.3% (55 of 247 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.45 · 17.8% (44 of 247 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.45 · 16.6% (41 of 247 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.42 · 19.4% (48 of 247 decks)
- Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (35 of 247 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (37 of 247 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 0.44 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Black Poplar Shaman relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.20 · 80.2% (198 of 247 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Nemata, Primeval Warden relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.41 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- The Kingpin of Crime relevance 0.41 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Colfenor, the Last Yew relevance 0.23 · 54.7% (135 of 247 decks)
- Essence of Antiquity relevance 0.34 · 18.2% (45 of 247 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Six relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.30 · 26.3% (65 of 247 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Unhallowed Phalanx relevance 0.30 · 24.3% (60 of 247 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 0.33 · 14.2% (35 of 247 decks)
- Armored Armadillo relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Magnigoth Treefolk relevance 0.40 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir relevance 0.36 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Tapestry Warden relevance 0.38 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.38 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.26 · 30.4% (75 of 247 decks)
- Mangara, the Diplomat relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Unstoppable Ash relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Slumbering Walker relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Overgrown Zealot relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.33 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.27 · 22.3% (55 of 247 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.24 · 34.8% (86 of 247 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Trostani, Selesnya's Voice relevance 0.27 · 22.3% (55 of 247 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
All artifacts (29)
- Bark of Doran relevance 0.42 · 27.1% (67 of 247 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (34 of 247 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.33 · 21.5% (53 of 247 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.42 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Captain America's Shield relevance 0.28 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.23 · 24.3% (60 of 247 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.29 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.28 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Warmonger's Chariot relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Colfenor's Urn relevance 0.18 · 31.6% (78 of 247 decks)
- Belbe's Armor relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.20 · 18.2% (45 of 247 decks)
- Abzan Monument relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.16 · 16.2% (40 of 247 decks)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 0.17 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.16 · 11.7% (29 of 247 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 26.3% (65 of 247 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.03 · 77.7% (192 of 247 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 82.6% (204 of 247 decks)
All enchantments (33)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.45 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 0.42 · 16.6% (41 of 247 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (32 of 247 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.43 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.31 · 35.2% (87 of 247 decks)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Eland Umbra relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.31 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Rolling Stones relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.24 · 38.9% (96 of 247 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.43 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Fruit of the First Tree relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.33 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Spidersilk Armor relevance 0.27 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.25 · 21.1% (52 of 247 decks)
- Angelic Chorus relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.18 · 46.6% (115 of 247 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Stoneskin relevance 0.17 · 45.7% (113 of 247 decks)
- Animate Wall relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Assemble the Players relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Smile at Death relevance 0.17 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Gauntlets of Light relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.05 · 85.8% (212 of 247 decks)
- Jaws of Defeat relevance 0.04 · 76.9% (190 of 247 decks)
- Behind the Scenes relevance 0.06 · 19.4% (48 of 247 decks)
All instants (50)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.45 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 0.33 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Reach of Branches relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.27 · 22.3% (55 of 247 decks)
- Golgari Charm relevance 0.33 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Ready // Willing relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.31 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.32 · 9.7% (24 of 247 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (50 of 247 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.29 · 10.1% (25 of 247 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.21 · 34.4% (85 of 247 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Grim Contest relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Fracture relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Thoughtweft Charge relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Bar the Door relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.17 · 46.6% (115 of 247 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Overkill relevance 0.24 · 13.0% (32 of 247 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.18 · 33.2% (82 of 247 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Dina's Guidance relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.35 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Mythos of Nethroi relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.16 · 15.8% (39 of 247 decks)
- Refuse to Yield relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Despark relevance 0.11 · 31.2% (77 of 247 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 0.06 · 68.0% (168 of 247 decks)
All sorceries (38)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.46 · 19.4% (48 of 247 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.44 · 20.6% (51 of 247 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.40 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.44 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.27 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.23 · 40.1% (99 of 247 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.29 · 15.4% (38 of 247 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.22 · 40.5% (100 of 247 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.26 · 23.5% (58 of 247 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Fell the Mighty relevance 0.21 · 40.5% (100 of 247 decks)
- Destined Confrontation relevance 0.30 · 10.1% (25 of 247 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (50 of 247 decks)
- Chelonian Tackle relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.20 · 41.3% (102 of 247 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 52.6% (130 of 247 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.18 · 44.9% (111 of 247 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Eerie Ultimatum relevance 0.21 · 18.2% (45 of 247 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- The Battle of Bywater relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Vindicate relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.15 · 24.7% (61 of 247 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.16 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Tip the Scales relevance 0.13 · 17.0% (42 of 247 decks)
- Reunion of the House relevance 0.09 · 36.8% (91 of 247 decks)
- Will of the Abzan relevance 0.11 · 15.8% (39 of 247 decks)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 0.07 · 53.8% (133 of 247 decks)
- Expel the Interlopers relevance 0.08 · 33.6% (83 of 247 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (1)
- Huatli, the Sun's Heart relevance 0.25 · 33.6% (83 of 247 decks)
All utility lands (36)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.31 · 26.7% (66 of 247 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.28 · 27.9% (69 of 247 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (37 of 247 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Vault of the Archangel relevance 0.28 · 19.4% (48 of 247 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.30 · 12.6% (31 of 247 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.30 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.28 · 13.8% (34 of 247 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.40 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Forbidding Watchtower relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Indatha Triome relevance 0.18 · 32.0% (79 of 247 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.20 · 22.3% (55 of 247 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 44.5% (110 of 247 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Miren, the Moaning Well relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.14 · 20.6% (51 of 247 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.14 · 18.6% (46 of 247 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.14 · 17.4% (43 of 247 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Deceptive Landscape relevance 0.10 · 30.8% (76 of 247 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.09 · 42.1% (104 of 247 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.08 · 37.7% (93 of 247 decks)
All lands (50)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (25 of 247 decks)
- Murmuring Bosk relevance 0.30 · 41.3% (102 of 247 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.34 · 15.4% (38 of 247 decks)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (25 of 247 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.32 · 12.6% (31 of 247 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.34 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.24 · 23.5% (58 of 247 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.24 · 21.1% (52 of 247 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.22 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.24 · 18.6% (46 of 247 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.22 · 25.5% (63 of 247 decks)
- Turbulent Fen relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Shineshadow Snarl relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.23 · 21.1% (52 of 247 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.24 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.22 · 21.1% (52 of 247 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.22 · 22.3% (55 of 247 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.26 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.21 · 24.7% (61 of 247 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.21 · 23.9% (59 of 247 decks)
- Bleachbone Verge relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.21 · 21.9% (54 of 247 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.28 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.17 · 44.5% (110 of 247 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.16 · 46.2% (114 of 247 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Desolate Mire relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Godless Shrine relevance 0.17 · 35.2% (87 of 247 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Viridescent Bog relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Fetid Heath relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.35 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.16 · 35.2% (87 of 247 decks)
- Orzhov Guildgate relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Eclipsed Steppe relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Doran, Besieged by Time, from 247 real Commander decks.