Cards like Preordain
5.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 57%
- Serum Visions 36%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Brainstorm
5.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 40% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other blue decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 79%
- Brainsurge 36%
Cards like Opt
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Proft's Eidetic Memory
5.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Urza's Bauble
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Urza's Bauble 21%
- Mishra's Bauble 21%
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 57%
- Mystic Remora 29%
Cards like Commandeer
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.63 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 36%
- Force of Negation 29%
Cards like Psychic Corrosion
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Cryptic Command
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards like Unwind
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Thought Scour
8.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Lotus Petal
7.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mind Stone
6.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 43%
- Chromatic Sphere 7%
Cards like Howling Mine
5.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thirst for Discovery
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Thirst for Meaning, Thirst for Knowledge
Cards like Counterspell
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 57%
- Negate 43%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Archmage's Charm
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Runeboggle, Confounding Riddle, Force Void, Supreme Will, Soul Read, Spellgyre, Thassa's Intervention, Artistic Refusal
Cards like Mystical Tutor
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession, Personal Tutor
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sky Diamond
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 29%
- Prismatic Lens 21%
- Coldsteel Heart 7%
- Star Compass 7%
Other options: Guardian Idol
Cards like Chrome Mox
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 21%
- Mox Diamond 7%
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 29%
- Swiftfoot Boots 14%
All top picks (50)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Turbulent Dreams relevance 0.25 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.18 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 0.19 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.14 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.12 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Chakra Meditation relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.12 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- The Irencrag relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.11 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- See Beyond relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.12 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Fblthp, Impossibly Lost relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Minn, Wily Illusionist relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.09 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.11 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.08 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.08 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Leveler relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.09 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.09 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Doom's Time Platform relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.18 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.12 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Fblthp, Impossibly Lost relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Minn, Wily Illusionist relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Leveler relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.09 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Subterfuge relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.09 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Emrakul, the Exigent Doom relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Donnie & April, Adorkable Duo relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sphinx of Lost Truths relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Alandra, Sky Dreamer relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Lakeshore Apothecary relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Breaker of Creation relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Magus of the Bazaar relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Seasoned Cryomancer relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Unesh, Criosphinx Sovereign relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ambling Stormshell relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Living Conundrum relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Alrund, God of the Cosmos // Hakka, Whispering Raven relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Muse Seeker relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Council of Reeds relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Final-Word Phantom relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.07 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.14 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- The Irencrag relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Doom's Time Platform relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Conjurer's Bauble relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Profane Memento relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Arcum's Astrolabe relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mirrormind Crown relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.08 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.08 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.07 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.07 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Fractured Powerstone relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.05 · 71.4% (10 of 14 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.07 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.06 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.07 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.06 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Chromatic Sphere relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Chromatic Star relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All enchantments (43)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Chakra Meditation relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.11 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.09 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.07 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.09 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Bottomless Pool // Locker Room relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Psychic Possession relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Arcane Laboratory relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ever-Watching Threshold relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.06 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.05 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All instants (50)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.11 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.12 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.08 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.07 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.06 · 78.6% (11 of 14 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.09 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.09 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.06 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Null Elemental Blast relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.07 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.08 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Confusticate and Bebother relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Words of Wisdom relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Vision Skeins relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.06 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.06 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
All sorceries (49)
- Turbulent Dreams relevance 0.25 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 0.19 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.12 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- See Beyond relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.09 · 57.1% (8 of 14 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.08 · 64.3% (9 of 14 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.11 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.09 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Turtles in Time relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mass Appeal relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Tempted by the Oriq relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Candlekeep Inspiration relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.03 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.10 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Karn Liberated relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Jace, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Theorist's Sanctum relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Bazaar of Baghdad relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.09 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.08 · 42.9% (6 of 14 decks)
- Petrified Hamlet relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Blighted Cataract relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.07 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.07 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.07 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.07 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.04 · 71.4% (10 of 14 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.06 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (7 of 14 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.06 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.05 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.05 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
All lands (23)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.09 · 35.7% (5 of 14 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (4 of 14 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Bad River relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.09 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Flood Plain relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.03 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 71.4% (10 of 14 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Mr. Spock, Science Officer, from 14 real Commander decks.