Cards like Nature's Lore
2.3× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 45% of other Naya decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 23% of other Naya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.72 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 59%
- Three Visits 50%
- Skyshroud Claim 30%
- Ranger's Path 2%
Other options: Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Cultivate
1.5× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Naya decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 39% of other Naya decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 54%
- Rampant Growth 46%
- Kodama's Reach 45%
- Shared Roots 7%
- Explosive Vegetation 5%
- Search for Tomorrow 4%
- Migration Path 4%
- Far Wanderings 2%
- Verdant Mastery 2%
- Untamed Wilds 2%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Elvish Piper
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Elvish Piper 45%
- Quicksilver Amulet 21%
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.8× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other Naya decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Naya decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Naya decks
Cards like Druid of the Anima
1.9× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Naya decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Naya decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.46 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Druid of the Anima 29%
- Llanowar Elves 25%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 18%
- Elvish Mystic 9%
- Fyndhorn Elves 4%
- Boreal Druid 2%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Skyshroud Elf, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Steward of Valeron, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Bloom Tender
8.4× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Naya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Bloom Tender 48%
- Faeburrow Elder 14%
Cards like Illusionist's Bracers
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Regal Behemoth
20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Naya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Naya decks
Cards
Other options: Entourage of Trest, Palace Sentinels, Crimson Fleet Commodore, Protector of the Crown, Crown-Hunter Hireling
Cards like Old Gnawbone
17× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Naya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Naya decks
Cards like Worldly Tutor
2.1× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Naya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Naya decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 30%
- Eladamri's Call 9%
- Sylvan Tutor 5%
Cards like Archetype of Endurance
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Gruul Ragebeast
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Naya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Gruul Ragebeast 25%
- Apex Altisaur 18%
- Thorn Mammoth 14%
Other options: Pheres-Band Brawler, Affectionate Indrik, Atzocan Archer, Somberwald Stag, Agatha's Champion
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
14× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Naya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Naya decks
Cards
Other options: Leafkin Druid
Cards like Mirari's Wake
8.2× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Naya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Naya decks
Cards
Other options: Mana Flare, Heartbeat of Spring
Cards like Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea
17× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Naya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Naya decks
Cards like Vigor
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Cards like Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Naya decks
Cards like Karlach, Fury of Avernus
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
14× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Naya decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok, Earthshaker Giant
Cards like Warstorm Surge
11× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Naya decks
Cards like Blightsteel Colossus
6.5× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Austere Command
4.2× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Naya decks
All top picks (50)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.38 · 62.5% (35 of 56 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.38 · 53.6% (30 of 56 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.35 · 58.9% (33 of 56 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.38 · 48.2% (27 of 56 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.41 · 41.1% (23 of 56 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 0.28 · 75.0% (42 of 56 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.32 · 60.7% (34 of 56 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.29 · 67.9% (38 of 56 decks)
- Sigarda, Host of Herons relevance 0.39 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.38 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Godsire relevance 0.38 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.31 · 57.1% (32 of 56 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.37 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Dragonlord Dromoka relevance 0.35 · 44.6% (25 of 56 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.34 · 44.6% (25 of 56 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.35 · 39.3% (22 of 56 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.34 · 42.9% (24 of 56 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.36 · 35.7% (20 of 56 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.37 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.39 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.36 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Serra's Emissary relevance 0.35 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 0.37 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.30 · 48.2% (27 of 56 decks)
- Knotvine Mystic relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.38 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.31 · 42.9% (24 of 56 decks)
- Aurora Awakener relevance 0.36 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.38 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.36 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.38 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Curious Colossus relevance 0.37 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.36 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 0.34 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.35 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Terror of the Peaks relevance 0.29 · 42.9% (24 of 56 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.35 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.33 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.36 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.36 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.33 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.25 · 55.4% (31 of 56 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.27 · 46.4% (26 of 56 decks)
- Mayael's Aria relevance 0.33 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Meglonoth relevance 0.36 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Duke Ulder Ravengard relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.38 · 62.5% (35 of 56 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.38 · 53.6% (30 of 56 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.35 · 58.9% (33 of 56 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.38 · 48.2% (27 of 56 decks)
- Angel of Serenity relevance 0.41 · 41.1% (23 of 56 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 0.28 · 75.0% (42 of 56 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.32 · 60.7% (34 of 56 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.29 · 67.9% (38 of 56 decks)
- Sigarda, Host of Herons relevance 0.39 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.38 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Godsire relevance 0.38 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.31 · 57.1% (32 of 56 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.37 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Dragonlord Dromoka relevance 0.35 · 44.6% (25 of 56 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.34 · 44.6% (25 of 56 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.35 · 39.3% (22 of 56 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.34 · 42.9% (24 of 56 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.36 · 35.7% (20 of 56 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.37 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.39 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.36 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Serra's Emissary relevance 0.35 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 0.37 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.30 · 48.2% (27 of 56 decks)
- Knotvine Mystic relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.38 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Aurora Awakener relevance 0.36 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Angelic Arbiter relevance 0.38 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Curious Colossus relevance 0.37 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.36 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 0.34 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.35 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Terror of the Peaks relevance 0.29 · 42.9% (24 of 56 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.35 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.36 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Drumhunter relevance 0.36 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.33 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.25 · 55.4% (31 of 56 decks)
- Meglonoth relevance 0.36 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Duke Ulder Ravengard relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.32 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.28 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Vagrant Plowbeasts relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.34 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.30 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.33 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus relevance 0.31 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.31 · 42.9% (24 of 56 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.38 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.36 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Battlemage's Bracers relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Quicksilver Amulet relevance 0.33 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Doors of Durin relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Cosmic Cube relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Obelisk of Naya relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 33.9% (19 of 56 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.22 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.14 · 32.1% (18 of 56 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.15 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Talisman of Conviction relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Oracle's Vault relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Thran Turbine relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Summoner's Grimoire relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.13 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.13 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.13 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Cursed Mirror relevance 0.12 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.12 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.12 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 55.4% (31 of 56 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.27 · 46.4% (26 of 56 decks)
- Mayael's Aria relevance 0.33 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Where Ancients Tread relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.21 · 32.1% (18 of 56 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.23 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Trace of Abundance relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.20 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.21 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Cream of the Crop relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Sneak Attack relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Cabaretti Ascendancy relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.14 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Aggravated Assault relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Rising of the Day relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.07 · 53.6% (30 of 56 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Fires of Invention relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Elemental Resonance relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Killer Instinct relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Industrial Advancement relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Braid of Fire relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Elfhame Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Rule of Law relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
All instants (50)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.26 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.20 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.16 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Boros Charm relevance 0.13 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.13 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.14 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.15 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.09 · 51.8% (29 of 56 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.13 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (16 of 56 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.08 · 35.7% (20 of 56 decks)
- Ancient Grudge relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Demystify relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Kozilek's Return relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Shelter relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Shatter relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- You Find Some Prisoners relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Return to Dust relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Summoning Trap relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Mana Tithe relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Erase relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Cabaretti Charm relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Road // Ruin relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.10 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.13 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.33 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.26 · 39.3% (22 of 56 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.30 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.33 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.29 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Titanic Ultimatum relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.23 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.20 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Hull Breach relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.14 · 44.6% (25 of 56 decks)
- Anger of the Gods relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (28 of 56 decks)
- Ascend from Avernus relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Recross the Paths relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Hour of Revelation relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 58.9% (33 of 56 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.10 · 46.4% (26 of 56 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.13 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.08 · 53.6% (30 of 56 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.07 · 66.1% (37 of 56 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.11 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Descend upon the Sinful relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Insurrection relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Cabaretti Confluence relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Ruin in Their Wake relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Gift of the Gargantuan relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Jokulhaups relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Random Encounter relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Ceaseless Conflict relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Ajani Vengeant relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Koth, Fire of Resistance relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Lukka, Coppercoat Outcast relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Domri Rade relevance 0.12 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.10 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (3)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Invasion of Shandalar // Leyline Surge relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.31 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.24 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Temple of Triumph relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (14 of 56 decks)
- Sheltering Landscape relevance 0.21 · 30.4% (17 of 56 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.22 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.20 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.21 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.19 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 58.9% (33 of 56 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Madblind Mountain relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Slayers' Stronghold relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Jetmir's Garden relevance 0.10 · 57.1% (32 of 56 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Kazuul's Fury // Kazuul's Cliffs relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Elegant Parlor relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Rishadan Port relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.09 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Raging Ravine relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
All lands (50)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.26 · 35.7% (20 of 56 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.23 · 35.7% (20 of 56 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.25 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Plateau relevance 0.26 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.24 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.26 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.28 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (8 of 56 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Alpine Meadow relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.23 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.23 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.23 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.22 · 17.9% (10 of 56 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.21 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.21 · 16.1% (9 of 56 decks)
- Needleverge Pathway // Pillarverge Pathway relevance 0.23 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Rith's Grove relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.18 · 23.2% (13 of 56 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.18 · 19.6% (11 of 56 decks)
- Turbulent Steppe relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Rugged Prairie relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (7 of 56 decks)
- Grove of the Burnwillows relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.15 · 35.7% (20 of 56 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 32.1% (18 of 56 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.14 · 37.5% (21 of 56 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 44.6% (25 of 56 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.14 · 39.3% (22 of 56 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (3 of 56 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (24 of 56 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (6 of 56 decks)
- Spectator Seating relevance 0.15 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.11 · 53.6% (30 of 56 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (4 of 56 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.15 · 21.4% (12 of 56 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (5 of 56 decks)
- Sacred Foundry relevance 0.10 · 60.7% (34 of 56 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Mayael the Anima, from 56 real Commander decks.