Change per day
Archetypes
68% of decks lean toward it
63% of decks lean toward it
37% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Chasm Skulker
68% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Evolution Sage
63% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Finale of Revelation
37% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Dark Ritual
36% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 59 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Brainstorm
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 41%
- Brainsurge 14%
Cards like Talisman of Dominance
1.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Sultai decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Kiora's Follower
16× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Forensic Researcher, Kelpie Guide, North Pole Patrol
Cards like Rhystic Study
2.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 28%
- Mystic Remora 25%
Cards like Sol Ring
2.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 79%
- Mana Vault 12%
- Grim Monolith 8%
- Basalt Monolith 5%
Cards like Dimir Signet
2.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Dimir Signet 15%
- Simic Signet 13%
- Golgari Signet 12%
Cards like Force of Will
2.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Force of Will 15%
- Force of Negation 14%
Cards like Flux Channeler
12× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 24%
- Dreamtide Whale 13%
Cards like Windfall
18× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
2.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Vampiric Tutor 23%
- Imperial Seal 10%
- Grim Tutor 3%
- Cruel Tutor 1%
Cards like Thought Vessel
7.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Contentious Plan
19× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Counterspell 33%
- Negate 17%
- Envelop 1%
- Essence Scatter 1%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Staff of Domination
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
6.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
1.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Sultai decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Sultai decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Sultai decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 31%
- Three Visits 26%
- Skyshroud Claim 2%
- Ranger's Path 1%
Other options: Hunting Wilds, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Heroic Intervention
2.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Teferi's Ageless Insight
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Frantic Search
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Demonic Tutor
2.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Illicit Shipment, Behold the Beyond, Razaketh's Rite, Rhystic Tutor, Demonic Collusion, Demonic Bargain
Cards like Thrummingbird
7.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
All top picks (50)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.56 · 19.4% (30 of 155 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.49 · 31.0% (48 of 155 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.51 · 25.2% (39 of 155 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.54 · 20.6% (32 of 155 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.51 · 16.8% (26 of 155 decks)
- Liliana's Talent relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.44 · 27.1% (42 of 155 decks)
- Carth the Lion relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (31 of 155 decks)
- Liliana, Dreadhorde General relevance 0.43 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.51 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.42 · 21.9% (34 of 155 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.41 · 21.3% (33 of 155 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.34 · 39.4% (61 of 155 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.39 · 23.9% (37 of 155 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.36 · 31.6% (49 of 155 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.36 · 31.0% (48 of 155 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.47 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.50 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.41 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.31 · 40.6% (63 of 155 decks)
- Kozilek's Command relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.31 · 41.3% (64 of 155 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.45 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.36 · 24.5% (38 of 155 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.37 · 19.4% (30 of 155 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting relevance 0.36 · 21.9% (34 of 155 decks)
- Necrodominance relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Ob Nixilis Reignited relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Vraska, Golgari Queen relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (19 of 155 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.37 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.34 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Szat's Will relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Vraska, Relic Seeker relevance 0.39 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.44 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.44 · 27.1% (42 of 155 decks)
- Carth the Lion relevance 0.48 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.41 · 21.3% (33 of 155 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.39 · 23.9% (37 of 155 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.36 · 31.6% (49 of 155 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.41 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.37 · 19.4% (30 of 155 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.37 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.34 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.35 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.27 · 30.3% (47 of 155 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Ophiomancer relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.30 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Emrakul, the World Anew relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.28 · 18.1% (28 of 155 decks)
- Spawnbed Protector relevance 0.40 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.29 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Smothering Abomination relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.28 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.29 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Yawgmoth, Thran Physician relevance 0.31 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Gilder Bairn relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.26 · 18.7% (29 of 155 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.27 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Tainted Observer relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.27 · 14.8% (23 of 155 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.32 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.32 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Pitiless Plunderer relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.26 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Scheming Aspirant relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Bioessence Hydra relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Beledros Witherbloom relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Kozilek's Predator relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Nest Invader relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.51 · 25.2% (39 of 155 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.54 · 20.6% (32 of 155 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.51 · 16.8% (26 of 155 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.34 · 39.4% (61 of 155 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.36 · 31.0% (48 of 155 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.44 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.28 · 27.1% (42 of 155 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.27 · 23.9% (37 of 155 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.30 · 14.8% (23 of 155 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.28 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.24 · 15.5% (24 of 155 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.23 · 18.1% (28 of 155 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.20 · 28.4% (44 of 155 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.24 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.20 · 24.5% (38 of 155 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.22 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.22 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.23 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.24 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.23 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.18 · 18.7% (29 of 155 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.49 · 31.0% (48 of 155 decks)
- Liliana's Talent relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.51 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Necrodominance relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.26 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.24 · 20.0% (31 of 155 decks)
- Moldervine Reclamation relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.22 · 15.5% (24 of 155 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.19 · 25.2% (39 of 155 decks)
- Kaya's Ghostform relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.17 · 27.7% (43 of 155 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.24 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Black Market relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Way of the Necromancer relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.29 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Way of the Cryomancer relevance 0.28 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Way of the Paradox relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.24 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Funeral Room // Awakening Hall relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.22 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
All instants (50)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Kozilek's Command relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.31 · 41.3% (64 of 155 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.45 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Szat's Will relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.26 · 34.2% (53 of 155 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.30 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.31 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.29 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.21 · 40.0% (62 of 155 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.31 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Village Rites relevance 0.29 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.27 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.30 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.30 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.25 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.20 · 31.0% (48 of 155 decks)
- Darkness relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.23 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.23 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.21 · 21.9% (34 of 155 decks)
- Plumb the Forbidden relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.23 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.26 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.22 · 15.5% (24 of 155 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.21 · 22.6% (35 of 155 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.24 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Vraska's Fall relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.26 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.23 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.23 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.24 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.19 · 24.5% (38 of 155 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.24 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.17 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (31 of 155 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 33.5% (52 of 155 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (31 of 155 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.42 · 21.9% (34 of 155 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.31 · 40.6% (63 of 155 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.36 · 24.5% (38 of 155 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.32 · 16.8% (26 of 155 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.29 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Whispering Madness relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Drown in Ichor relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.28 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Dark Deal relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.21 · 27.1% (42 of 155 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.26 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.22 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.27 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.23 · 12.3% (19 of 155 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.26 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Infectious Inquiry relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.25 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.25 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.22 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Settle the Score relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Game Plan relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.18 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.20 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Of One Mind relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.17 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.19 · 17.4% (27 of 155 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Flux relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.22 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.17 · 21.9% (34 of 155 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
All planeswalkers (50)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.56 · 19.4% (30 of 155 decks)
- Liliana, Dreadhorde General relevance 0.43 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.47 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.50 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.43 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting relevance 0.36 · 21.9% (34 of 155 decks)
- Ob Nixilis Reignited relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Vraska, Golgari Queen relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (19 of 155 decks)
- Vraska, Relic Seeker relevance 0.39 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Lolth, Spider Queen relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.35 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Tamiyo, Compleated Sage relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.36 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.36 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.32 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Liliana Vess relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Garruk, Cursed Huntsman relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Sorin Markov relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Vraska the Unseen relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.27 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.24 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Liliana of the Dark Realms relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Oko, the Trickster relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 0.47 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.31 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.29 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.16 · 34.2% (53 of 155 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.18 · 23.9% (37 of 155 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 12.3% (19 of 155 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (31 of 155 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.20 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.17 · 18.1% (28 of 155 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.16 · 18.7% (29 of 155 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.16 · 18.1% (28 of 155 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.12 · 41.3% (64 of 155 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 19.4% (30 of 155 decks)
- Spawning Bed relevance 0.30 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.17 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.16 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.16 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.17 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.14 · 12.3% (19 of 155 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.15 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.16 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Restless Cottage relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (8 of 155 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.12 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.13 · 12.3% (19 of 155 decks)
- Spymaster's Vault relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (4 of 155 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
All lands (50)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.23 · 20.6% (32 of 155 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.22 · 21.3% (33 of 155 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.22 · 16.8% (26 of 155 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.22 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.22 · 19.4% (30 of 155 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.22 · 16.1% (25 of 155 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.20 · 16.8% (26 of 155 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.20 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.18 · 18.7% (29 of 155 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.22 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (6 of 155 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.22 · 9.0% (14 of 155 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.17 · 25.2% (39 of 155 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.18 · 16.8% (26 of 155 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.18 · 17.4% (27 of 155 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.20 · 12.3% (19 of 155 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.18 · 18.1% (28 of 155 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (11 of 155 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.16 · 28.4% (44 of 155 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.20 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Dreadship Reef relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (5 of 155 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.19 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.17 · 14.8% (23 of 155 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.19 · 8.4% (13 of 155 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (31 of 155 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.12 · 43.2% (67 of 155 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 40.6% (63 of 155 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.13 · 34.8% (54 of 155 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 38.7% (60 of 155 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (12 of 155 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 27.7% (43 of 155 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.13 · 30.3% (47 of 155 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.16 · 9.7% (15 of 155 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.27 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.09 · 56.1% (87 of 155 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 58.1% (90 of 155 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (3 of 155 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.09 · 58.7% (91 of 155 decks)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (7 of 155 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.16 · 6.5% (10 of 155 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (9 of 155 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools, from 155 real Commander partner decks.