Cards like Talisman of Dominance
1.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Sultai decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Kiora's Follower
17× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Forensic Researcher, Kelpie Guide, North Pole Patrol
Cards like Brainstorm
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 41%
- Brainsurge 13%
Cards like Rhystic Study
2.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 28%
- Mystic Remora 25%
Cards like Sol Ring
2.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 79%
- Mana Vault 11%
- Grim Monolith 8%
- Basalt Monolith 5%
Cards like Dimir Signet
2.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Dimir Signet 15%
- Simic Signet 13%
- Golgari Signet 11%
Cards like Force of Will
2.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Force of Will 15%
- Force of Negation 14%
Cards like Flux Channeler
12× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 23%
- Dreamtide Whale 13%
Cards like Windfall
19× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
2.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Vampiric Tutor 23%
- Imperial Seal 9%
- Grim Tutor 3%
- Cruel Tutor 1%
Cards like Thousand-Year Elixir
19× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Magewright's Stone, Jandor's Saddlebags, Synod Artificer, Filigree Sages, Puppet Strings, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Thought Vessel
8.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Contentious Plan
20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Staff of Domination
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Counterspell 34%
- Negate 17%
- Envelop 1%
- Essence Scatter 1%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Wash Away, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Sultai decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Sultai decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 31%
- Three Visits 26%
- Skyshroud Claim 2%
- Ranger's Path 1%
Other options: Hunting Wilds, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
5.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
1.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Sultai decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Heroic Intervention
2.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Teferi's Ageless Insight
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Frantic Search
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Demonic Tutor
2.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Illicit Shipment, Behold the Beyond, Razaketh's Rite, Rhystic Tutor, Demonic Collusion, Demonic Bargain
Cards like Thrummingbird
8.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
All top picks (50)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.56 · 19.9% (30 of 151 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.49 · 31.1% (47 of 151 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.51 · 25.2% (38 of 151 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.53 · 20.5% (31 of 151 decks)
- Liliana's Talent relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.44 · 27.8% (42 of 151 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.49 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Liliana, Dreadhorde General relevance 0.43 · 26.5% (40 of 151 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.46 · 19.9% (30 of 151 decks)
- Carth the Lion relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.41 · 21.9% (33 of 151 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.46 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.41 · 21.2% (32 of 151 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.33 · 39.1% (59 of 151 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.36 · 31.1% (47 of 151 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.39 · 23.2% (35 of 151 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.35 · 30.5% (46 of 151 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.43 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Kozilek's Command relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.31 · 40.4% (61 of 151 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.31 · 41.1% (62 of 151 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.41 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.35 · 24.5% (37 of 151 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.43 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting relevance 0.35 · 21.9% (33 of 151 decks)
- Ob Nixilis Reignited relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Vraska, Golgari Queen relevance 0.40 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.36 · 18.5% (28 of 151 decks)
- Necrodominance relevance 0.42 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.36 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.41 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.39 · 11.9% (18 of 151 decks)
- Szat's Will relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.33 · 22.5% (34 of 151 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.43 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Vraska, Relic Seeker relevance 0.39 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.44 · 27.8% (42 of 151 decks)
- Carth the Lion relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.46 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.41 · 21.2% (32 of 151 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.39 · 23.2% (35 of 151 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.35 · 30.5% (46 of 151 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.43 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.43 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.36 · 18.5% (28 of 151 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.36 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.41 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.39 · 11.9% (18 of 151 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.33 · 22.5% (34 of 151 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.43 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.35 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.27 · 29.8% (45 of 151 decks)
- Ophiomancer relevance 0.33 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Spawnbed Protector relevance 0.40 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Emrakul, the World Anew relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.30 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.29 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Smothering Abomination relevance 0.36 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (27 of 151 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.29 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.28 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Yawgmoth, Thran Physician relevance 0.31 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Gilder Bairn relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.26 · 18.5% (28 of 151 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.27 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.32 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.26 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.32 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Pitiless Plunderer relevance 0.29 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.33 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Tainted Observer relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.26 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Bioessence Hydra relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Scheming Aspirant relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Kozilek's Predator relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Nest Invader relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.51 · 25.2% (38 of 151 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.53 · 20.5% (31 of 151 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.49 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.33 · 39.1% (59 of 151 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.36 · 31.1% (47 of 151 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.28 · 27.2% (41 of 151 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.38 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.30 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.27 · 23.8% (36 of 151 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.28 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.33 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.24 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.27 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.23 · 17.9% (27 of 151 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.20 · 29.1% (44 of 151 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.23 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.20 · 23.8% (36 of 151 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 26.5% (40 of 151 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.22 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.23 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.18 · 19.2% (29 of 151 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.22 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.49 · 31.1% (47 of 151 decks)
- Liliana's Talent relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Necrodominance relevance 0.42 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.26 · 26.5% (40 of 151 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.26 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (31 of 151 decks)
- Moldervine Reclamation relevance 0.28 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.21 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Kaya's Ghostform relevance 0.23 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.19 · 24.5% (37 of 151 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.17 · 27.8% (42 of 151 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Black Market relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.29 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Way of the Necromancer relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Funeral Room // Awakening Hall relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Dreadhorde Invasion relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Grave Pact relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
All instants (50)
- Kozilek's Command relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.31 · 41.1% (62 of 151 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.41 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Szat's Will relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (52 of 151 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.30 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.29 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.30 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.21 · 39.7% (60 of 151 decks)
- Village Rites relevance 0.29 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.30 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.26 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.25 · 11.9% (18 of 151 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.20 · 31.8% (48 of 151 decks)
- Darkness relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.23 · 14.6% (22 of 151 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Plumb the Forbidden relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.23 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.21 · 21.2% (32 of 151 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.20 · 22.5% (34 of 151 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.22 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.22 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.24 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.22 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.23 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.19 · 23.8% (36 of 151 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Vraska's Fall relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.17 · 25.8% (39 of 151 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.17 · 19.9% (30 of 151 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 33.8% (51 of 151 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.17 · 21.9% (33 of 151 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.46 · 19.9% (30 of 151 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.41 · 21.9% (33 of 151 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.31 · 40.4% (61 of 151 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.35 · 24.5% (37 of 151 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (26 of 151 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Whispering Madness relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.28 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Drown in Ichor relevance 0.30 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Dark Deal relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.21 · 27.8% (42 of 151 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.22 · 16.6% (25 of 151 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.23 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.25 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.25 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Game Plan relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Of One Mind relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.17 · 26.5% (40 of 151 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.18 · 23.2% (35 of 151 decks)
- Flux relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Infectious Inquiry relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.19 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.21 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.18 · 16.6% (25 of 151 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.22 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.20 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.16 · 21.2% (32 of 151 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
All planeswalkers (50)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.56 · 19.9% (30 of 151 decks)
- Liliana, Dreadhorde General relevance 0.43 · 26.5% (40 of 151 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting relevance 0.35 · 21.9% (33 of 151 decks)
- Ob Nixilis Reignited relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Vraska, Golgari Queen relevance 0.40 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Vraska, Relic Seeker relevance 0.39 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.41 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Lolth, Spider Queen relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.35 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Tamiyo, Compleated Sage relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.32 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Liliana Vess relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.29 · 11.9% (18 of 151 decks)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Sorin Markov relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Garruk, Cursed Huntsman relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.27 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.23 · 13.9% (21 of 151 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Vraska the Unseen relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.27 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Liliana of the Dark Realms relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Oko, the Trickster relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.31 · 23.8% (36 of 151 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.28 · 22.5% (34 of 151 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.26 · 10.6% (16 of 151 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.21 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.18 · 23.8% (36 of 151 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.16 · 33.8% (51 of 151 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.17 · 19.9% (30 of 151 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 25.8% (39 of 151 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (27 of 151 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.16 · 18.5% (28 of 151 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.16 · 18.5% (28 of 151 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Spawning Bed relevance 0.30 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.12 · 41.7% (63 of 151 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 19.2% (29 of 151 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.20 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.16 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.16 · 11.9% (18 of 151 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.17 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.14 · 11.9% (18 of 151 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.15 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Restless Cottage relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.14 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.15 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.13 · 12.6% (19 of 151 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.12 · 16.6% (25 of 151 decks)
- Spymaster's Vault relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (4 of 151 decks)
All lands (50)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.23 · 21.2% (32 of 151 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.22 · 21.2% (32 of 151 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.22 · 16.6% (25 of 151 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (29 of 151 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.22 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.22 · 15.9% (24 of 151 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (17 of 151 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.20 · 16.6% (25 of 151 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.22 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.18 · 18.5% (28 of 151 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.20 · 13.2% (20 of 151 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.18 · 17.2% (26 of 151 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.18 · 17.9% (27 of 151 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.17 · 25.2% (38 of 151 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (12 of 151 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.18 · 17.9% (27 of 151 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.19 · 11.9% (18 of 151 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.15 · 28.5% (43 of 151 decks)
- Dreadship Reef relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (5 of 151 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.17 · 15.2% (23 of 151 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.19 · 8.6% (13 of 151 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.16 · 20.5% (31 of 151 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (14 of 151 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.12 · 43.7% (66 of 151 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 41.1% (62 of 151 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.13 · 34.4% (52 of 151 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (8 of 151 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 39.1% (59 of 151 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 28.5% (43 of 151 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.13 · 31.1% (47 of 151 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.16 · 9.9% (15 of 151 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.27 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.17 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.09 · 55.6% (84 of 151 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 151 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (9 of 151 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 58.3% (88 of 151 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.09 · 58.3% (88 of 151 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.16 · 6.6% (10 of 151 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (6 of 151 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.16 · 4.6% (7 of 151 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools, from 151 real Commander partner decks.