Cards like Curiosity
5.9× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Izzet decks
65% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Izzet decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Curiosity 83%
- Ophidian Eye 66%
Cards like Rhystic Study
3.9× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other Izzet decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Izzet decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 54%
- Mystic Remora 51%
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
2.9× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Izzet decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other Izzet decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Izzet decks
Cards
Cards like Dispel
13× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Izzet decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Izzet decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Izzet decks
Cards like Force of Will
5.1× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Izzet decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Izzet decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Force of Will 42%
- Force of Negation 36%
Cards like Misdirection
14× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Izzet decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Izzet decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Misdirection 34%
- Commandeer 26%
- Snapback 20%
- Disrupting Shoal 14%
Cards like Counterspell
1.9× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Izzet decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Izzet decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.81 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Counterspell 67%
- Negate 36%
- Spell Snare 10%
- Minor Misstep 9%
- Wash Away 4%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Stern Scolding 2%
Other options: Envelop, Nullify, Outwit, Preemptive Strike, Intervene, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Wild Unraveling
Cards like Pyroblast
5.7× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Izzet decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Izzet decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Izzet decks
Cards like Pongify
2.5× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Izzet decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Izzet decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Pongify 48%
- Rapid Hybridization 38%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
2.6× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other Izzet decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Izzet decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other Izzet decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Chrome Mox
3.5× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Izzet decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Izzet decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 30%
- Mox Diamond 22%
Cards like Bolt Bend
Over 20× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Izzet decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Izzet decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Izzet decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.7× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 78% of other Izzet decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Izzet decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.85 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 80%
- Commander's Sphere 23%
Cards like Swan Song
8.2× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Izzet decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Izzet decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Swan Song 53%
- Strix Serenade 15%
Cards like Pentad Prism
Over 20× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Izzet decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Izzet decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Izzet decks
Cards like Reshape
Over 20× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Izzet decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Izzet decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Reshape 17%
- Transmute Artifact 12%
Cards like Preordain
1.9× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Izzet decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Izzet decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Preordain 49%
- Serum Visions 23%
- Deliberate 2%
Other options: Scour All Possibilities, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Foresee, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Opt
1.6× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Cards like Brainstorm
4.1× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Izzet decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Izzet decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 81%
- Brainsurge 12%
Cards like Lotus Petal
2.5× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Izzet decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Izzet decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 34%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 13%
Cards like Flame of Anor
3.3× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other Izzet decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Izzet decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Flame of Anor 25%
- Prismari Command 23%
Cards like Spell Pierce
4.7× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Izzet decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Izzet decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Spell Pierce 25%
- Mana Leak 7%
- Quench 2%
- Logic Knot 1%
- It'll Quench Ya! 1%
Other options: Clash of Wills, Reasonable Doubt, Lose Focus, Make Disappear, Revolutionary Rebuff, Force Spike, Metallic Rebuke, Rethink, Don't Make a Sound
Cards like Goblin Electromancer
1.3× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Izzet decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 18% of other Izzet decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.61 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Goblin Electromancer 30%
- Baral, Chief of Compliance 27%
- Stormcatch Mentor 17%
- Haughty Djinn 5%
- Mocking Sprite 2%
Other options: Spectacle Mage
Cards like Daze
13× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Izzet decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Izzet decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Izzet decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
1.8× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Izzet decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Izzet decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other Izzet decks
Cards
Cards like Winds of Change
9.3× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Izzet decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Izzet decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Izzet decks
Cards
- Winds of Change 19%
- Molten Psyche 5%
Cards like Guttersnipe
1.4× as likely as other Izzet decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Izzet decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Izzet decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other Izzet decks
Cards
Other options: Weaver of Lightning, Satyr Firedancer, Rockslide Sorcerer
All top picks (50)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.48 · 27.3% (48 of 176 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.45 · 26.7% (47 of 176 decks)
- Dragonologist relevance 0.45 · 26.1% (46 of 176 decks)
- Reckless Barbarian relevance 0.46 · 14.8% (26 of 176 decks)
- Vault 21: House Gambit relevance 0.48 · 12.5% (22 of 176 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.44 · 17.0% (30 of 176 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.44 · 16.5% (29 of 176 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.34 · 36.9% (65 of 176 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.42 · 17.0% (30 of 176 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (28 of 176 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 0.24 · 66.5% (117 of 176 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.35 · 29.0% (51 of 176 decks)
- Minor Misstep relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.26 · 55.7% (98 of 176 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (49 of 176 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (49 of 176 decks)
- Winds of Change relevance 0.38 · 18.8% (33 of 176 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.37 · 20.5% (36 of 176 decks)
- Mogg Salvage relevance 0.38 · 15.9% (28 of 176 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.41 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Scuzzback Scrounger relevance 0.44 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.35 · 25.6% (45 of 176 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.40 · 13.6% (24 of 176 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.38 · 15.3% (27 of 176 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (41 of 176 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (22 of 176 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Visionary relevance 0.31 · 36.4% (64 of 176 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.33 · 27.8% (49 of 176 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (33 of 176 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.31 · 33.5% (59 of 176 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (28 of 176 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.35 · 22.7% (40 of 176 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 83.0% (146 of 176 decks)
- Ojer Axonil, Deepest Might // Temple of Power relevance 0.38 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.35 · 21.6% (38 of 176 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (27 of 176 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.35 · 19.9% (35 of 176 decks)
- Goblin Engineer relevance 0.38 · 13.1% (23 of 176 decks)
- Pyrokinesis relevance 0.37 · 14.8% (26 of 176 decks)
- Noble's Purse relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.34 · 22.7% (40 of 176 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.28 · 38.1% (67 of 176 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.38 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 0.35 · 17.6% (31 of 176 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (19 of 176 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.40 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.25 · 51.1% (90 of 176 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.31 · 26.7% (47 of 176 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.39 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.35 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Dragonologist relevance 0.45 · 26.1% (46 of 176 decks)
- Reckless Barbarian relevance 0.46 · 14.8% (26 of 176 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.44 · 17.0% (30 of 176 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.44 · 16.5% (29 of 176 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.26 · 55.7% (98 of 176 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (49 of 176 decks)
- Scuzzback Scrounger relevance 0.44 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Visionary relevance 0.31 · 36.4% (64 of 176 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.33 · 27.8% (49 of 176 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (28 of 176 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.35 · 22.7% (40 of 176 decks)
- Ojer Axonil, Deepest Might // Temple of Power relevance 0.38 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (27 of 176 decks)
- Goblin Engineer relevance 0.38 · 13.1% (23 of 176 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.34 · 22.7% (40 of 176 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.40 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.25 · 51.1% (90 of 176 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.31 · 26.7% (47 of 176 decks)
- Glint-Horn Buccaneer relevance 0.35 · 13.1% (23 of 176 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.29 · 30.1% (53 of 176 decks)
- The Locust God relevance 0.34 · 13.1% (23 of 176 decks)
- Vivi Ornitier relevance 0.25 · 39.8% (70 of 176 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.27 · 30.7% (54 of 176 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.31 · 17.0% (30 of 176 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.25 · 36.4% (64 of 176 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (33 of 176 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (12 of 176 decks)
- Torbran, Thane of Red Fell relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (12 of 176 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.25 · 30.1% (53 of 176 decks)
- Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph relevance 0.34 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Electrostatic Field relevance 0.28 · 14.8% (26 of 176 decks)
- Treasonous Ogre relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
- Mizzix of the Izmagnus relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.31 · 9.7% (17 of 176 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (27 of 176 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.30 · 9.7% (17 of 176 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Dracogenius relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Crackling Drake relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Whirlpool Warrior relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Irencrag Pyromancer relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.26 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.22 · 22.2% (39 of 176 decks)
- Stormcatch Mentor relevance 0.23 · 17.0% (30 of 176 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.27 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.48 · 27.3% (48 of 176 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.45 · 26.7% (47 of 176 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (41 of 176 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (33 of 176 decks)
- Noble's Purse relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (19 of 176 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.40 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Izzet Locket relevance 0.38 · 9.7% (17 of 176 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.34 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.28 · 22.2% (39 of 176 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.28 · 21.6% (38 of 176 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.31 · 13.6% (24 of 176 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (11 of 176 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.29 · 15.9% (28 of 176 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.25 · 29.5% (52 of 176 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (11 of 176 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (11 of 176 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.27 · 19.9% (35 of 176 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.23 · 34.1% (60 of 176 decks)
- Fire Diamond relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (15 of 176 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.31 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (20 of 176 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (22 of 176 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (17 of 176 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.27 · 11.4% (20 of 176 decks)
- Firemind Vessel relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.17 · 42.6% (75 of 176 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.12 · 68.8% (121 of 176 decks)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.19 · 13.1% (23 of 176 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.18 · 13.1% (23 of 176 decks)
- Izzet Cluestone relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.16 · 19.3% (34 of 176 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.09 · 70.5% (124 of 176 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.18 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Tablet of Discovery relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Cursed Mirror relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Ruby Medallion relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.04 · 79.5% (140 of 176 decks)
All enchantments (36)
- Vault 21: House Gambit relevance 0.48 · 12.5% (22 of 176 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 0.24 · 66.5% (117 of 176 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (22 of 176 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 83.0% (146 of 176 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 0.35 · 17.6% (31 of 176 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.33 · 16.5% (29 of 176 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (12 of 176 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.18 · 51.1% (90 of 176 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.27 · 13.1% (23 of 176 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.17 · 54.0% (95 of 176 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 17.0% (30 of 176 decks)
- Fiery Inscription relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (14 of 176 decks)
- Artist's Talent relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (12 of 176 decks)
- Mindmoil relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Spiteful Banditry relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.18 · 10.8% (19 of 176 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Firemind's Research relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Sorcerer Class relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Powerbalance relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Rite of the Dragoncaller relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
All instants (50)
- Dispel relevance 0.34 · 36.9% (65 of 176 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (28 of 176 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.35 · 29.0% (51 of 176 decks)
- Minor Misstep relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (49 of 176 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.37 · 20.5% (36 of 176 decks)
- Mogg Salvage relevance 0.38 · 15.9% (28 of 176 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.35 · 25.6% (45 of 176 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.40 · 13.6% (24 of 176 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.38 · 15.3% (27 of 176 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.31 · 33.5% (59 of 176 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.35 · 21.6% (38 of 176 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.35 · 19.9% (35 of 176 decks)
- Pyrokinesis relevance 0.37 · 14.8% (26 of 176 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.28 · 38.1% (67 of 176 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.38 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.39 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.35 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
- Firestorm relevance 0.37 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.35 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
- Flare of Duplication relevance 0.34 · 15.3% (27 of 176 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (44 of 176 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.29 · 27.8% (49 of 176 decks)
- Ionize relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (15 of 176 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.28 · 29.5% (52 of 176 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (11 of 176 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.27 · 32.4% (57 of 176 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.28 · 27.3% (48 of 176 decks)
- Counterflux relevance 0.32 · 13.6% (24 of 176 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.31 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.27 · 29.0% (51 of 176 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.31 · 14.8% (26 of 176 decks)
- Expansion // Explosion relevance 0.31 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.25 · 35.2% (62 of 176 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.28 · 22.7% (40 of 176 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.30 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.26 · 26.1% (46 of 176 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.21 · 47.7% (84 of 176 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.23 · 37.5% (66 of 176 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.31 · 11.4% (20 of 176 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.23 · 35.8% (63 of 176 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (12 of 176 decks)
- Flame of Anor relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (44 of 176 decks)
- Geistwave relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.25 · 26.1% (46 of 176 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.25 · 23.9% (42 of 176 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.20 · 45.5% (80 of 176 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.33 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.25 · 22.7% (40 of 176 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Reshape relevance 0.42 · 17.0% (30 of 176 decks)
- Winds of Change relevance 0.38 · 18.8% (33 of 176 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.41 · 11.9% (21 of 176 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.29 · 19.3% (34 of 176 decks)
- Into the Fire relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.21 · 48.9% (86 of 176 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.27 · 22.7% (40 of 176 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Tormenting Voice relevance 0.37 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.27 · 15.9% (28 of 176 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.21 · 36.9% (65 of 176 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 0.25 · 21.0% (37 of 176 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.25 · 21.6% (38 of 176 decks)
- Molten Psyche relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.32 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.21 · 35.2% (62 of 176 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.17 · 55.1% (97 of 176 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.20 · 36.9% (65 of 176 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.17 · 49.4% (87 of 176 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.28 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Mizzium Mortars relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (12 of 176 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.16 · 52.3% (92 of 176 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (19 of 176 decks)
- Reforge the Soul relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Day's Undoing relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.22 · 17.0% (30 of 176 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (47 of 176 decks)
- Beacon Bolt relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.25 · 8.0% (14 of 176 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.19 · 19.3% (34 of 176 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (15 of 176 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Brotherhood's End relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Wheel of Misfortune relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Cathartic Reunion relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.19 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.15 · 17.6% (31 of 176 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Past in Flames relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Grapeshot relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Mana Geyser relevance 0.17 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.33 · 19.3% (34 of 176 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
- Ral, Monsoon Mage // Ral, Leyline Prodigy relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (12 of 176 decks)
- Ral, Storm Conduit relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (11 of 176 decks)
- Dack Fayden relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Ral, Crackling Wit relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Chandra, Torch of Defiance relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Saheeli, Sublime Artificer relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.31 · 34.7% (61 of 176 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (15 of 176 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.25 · 29.5% (52 of 176 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.25 · 26.1% (46 of 176 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (14 of 176 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (13 of 176 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.24 · 23.9% (42 of 176 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.28 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (19 of 176 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (15 of 176 decks)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.16 · 52.8% (93 of 176 decks)
- Restless Spire relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Shatterskull Smashing // Shatterskull, the Hammer Pass relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.17 · 40.9% (72 of 176 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.18 · 34.1% (60 of 176 decks)
- Prismari Campus relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.17 · 33.0% (58 of 176 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.24 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.17 · 31.3% (55 of 176 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.23 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.16 · 38.1% (67 of 176 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 20.5% (36 of 176 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (11 of 176 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 41.5% (73 of 176 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (12 of 176 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Desolate Lighthouse relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Coastal Peak relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Airship Engine Room relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (14 of 176 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Rush of Inspiration // Crackling Falls relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
- Spikefield Hazard // Spikefield Cave relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (4 of 176 decks)
All lands (50)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.40 · 18.2% (32 of 176 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.41 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.28 · 34.1% (60 of 176 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.28 · 29.0% (51 of 176 decks)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (9 of 176 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.36 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.29 · 16.5% (29 of 176 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.24 · 30.7% (54 of 176 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (44 of 176 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.29 · 11.4% (20 of 176 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.23 · 31.3% (55 of 176 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.23 · 31.8% (56 of 176 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.24 · 24.4% (43 of 176 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.30 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (25 of 176 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (15 of 176 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.22 · 32.4% (57 of 176 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.25 · 14.8% (26 of 176 decks)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (55 of 176 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 0.20 · 35.2% (62 of 176 decks)
- Highland Lake relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (8 of 176 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (11 of 176 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.18 · 43.8% (77 of 176 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (19 of 176 decks)
- Spirebluff Canal relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (38 of 176 decks)
- Molten Tributary relevance 0.27 · 8.0% (14 of 176 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.23 · 13.6% (24 of 176 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (17 of 176 decks)
- Great Furnace relevance 0.25 · 9.1% (16 of 176 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (22 of 176 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.17 · 33.0% (58 of 176 decks)
- Eroded Canyon relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.17 · 33.0% (58 of 176 decks)
- Scorched Geyser relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (18 of 176 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Silverbluff Bridge relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (10 of 176 decks)
- Riverpyre Verge relevance 0.17 · 26.7% (47 of 176 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (7 of 176 decks)
- Peculiar Lighthouse relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 0.14 · 41.5% (73 of 176 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.13 · 51.1% (90 of 176 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.11 · 61.9% (109 of 176 decks)
- Turbulent Springs relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (14 of 176 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.19 · 11.4% (20 of 176 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (5 of 176 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.10 · 59.1% (104 of 176 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.11 · 48.9% (86 of 176 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
- Volatile Fjord relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (6 of 176 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Niv-Mizzet, Parun, from 176 real Commander decks.