Hunting Wilds
Played in 195 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.84 · 1.3% (4 of 310 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.60 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ranger's Path relevance 2.72 · 45.1% (88 of 195 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 2.17 · 51.3% (100 of 195 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 2.11 · 64.6% (126 of 195 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.98 · 33.3% (65 of 195 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 1.86 · 41.5% (81 of 195 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 1.86 · 30.3% (59 of 195 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 1.52 · 39.0% (76 of 195 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 1.18 · 21.5% (42 of 195 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 1.06 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.96 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.82 · 13.3% (26 of 195 decks)
- Terramorph relevance 0.79 · 11.8% (23 of 195 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.68 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.66 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.57 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.57 · 23.6% (46 of 195 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.51 · 26.2% (51 of 195 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.50 · 33.8% (66 of 195 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.50 · 38.5% (75 of 195 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.48 · 22.1% (43 of 195 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (24 of 195 decks)
- Windgrace's Judgment relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (18 of 195 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (15 of 195 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (19 of 195 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (25 of 195 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (21 of 195 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.42 · 9.7% (19 of 195 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.41 · 10.8% (21 of 195 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.40 · 24.1% (47 of 195 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (26 of 195 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.57 · 23.6% (46 of 195 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.51 · 26.2% (51 of 195 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (24 of 195 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (19 of 195 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.40 · 24.1% (47 of 195 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 1.06 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
All instants (4)
- Windgrace's Judgment relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (18 of 195 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (25 of 195 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (21 of 195 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (17 of 195 decks)
All sorceries (22)
- Ranger's Path relevance 2.72 · 45.1% (88 of 195 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 2.17 · 51.3% (100 of 195 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 2.11 · 64.6% (126 of 195 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.98 · 33.3% (65 of 195 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 1.86 · 41.5% (81 of 195 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 1.86 · 30.3% (59 of 195 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 1.52 · 39.0% (76 of 195 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 1.18 · 21.5% (42 of 195 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.82 · 13.3% (26 of 195 decks)
- Terramorph relevance 0.79 · 11.8% (23 of 195 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.68 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.66 · 17.4% (34 of 195 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.57 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.50 · 33.8% (66 of 195 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.50 · 38.5% (75 of 195 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.48 · 22.1% (43 of 195 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (15 of 195 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.42 · 9.7% (19 of 195 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.41 · 10.8% (21 of 195 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (26 of 195 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.39 · 21.5% (42 of 195 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.38 · 14.9% (29 of 195 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.96 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.54 · 29.7% (58 of 195 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.53 · 29.7% (58 of 195 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.46 · 24.1% (47 of 195 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (24 of 195 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (19 of 195 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.42 · 11.3% (22 of 195 decks)
All lands (11)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.53 · 25.6% (50 of 195 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.49 · 22.6% (44 of 195 decks)
- Woodland Chasm relevance 0.48 · 12.8% (25 of 195 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (24 of 195 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.44 · 11.8% (23 of 195 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.43 · 24.6% (48 of 195 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.41 · 15.4% (30 of 195 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.40 · 13.3% (26 of 195 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.40 · 13.3% (26 of 195 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (26 of 195 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.39 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
EDH data for Hunting Wilds: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 195 real decks.