Baneful Omen
Played in 166 Sultai decks
30+23+4+4+11+4+4+
Color Identity Spread
2.6% Sultai
Most Relevant
Twilight Prophet 60.8% of decks
Twilight Prophet 60.8% of decks
Hidetsugu and Kairi 25.3% of decks
Hidetsugu and Kairi 25.3% of decks
Doom Whisperer 39.2% of decks
Doom Whisperer 39.2% of decks
Enhanced Surveillance 36.1% of decks
Enhanced Surveillance 36.1% of decks
Keen Duelist 19.9% of decks
Keen Duelist 19.9% of decks
Scroll Rack 24.1% of decks
Scroll Rack 24.1% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 3.52 · 60.8% (101 of 166 decks)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.73 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 1.54 · 39.2% (65 of 166 decks)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 1.44 · 36.1% (60 of 166 decks)
- Keen Duelist relevance 1.35 · 19.9% (33 of 166 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 1.34 · 24.1% (40 of 166 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 1.29 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 1.27 · 23.5% (39 of 166 decks)
- Sage of the Beyond relevance 1.25 · 26.5% (44 of 166 decks)
- Savvy Trader relevance 1.24 · 31.9% (53 of 166 decks)
- Nissa's Expedition relevance 1.24 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 1.23 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.23 · 42.8% (71 of 166 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 1.23 · 27.1% (45 of 166 decks)
- Overwhelming Remorse relevance 1.22 · 22.9% (38 of 166 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 1.18 · 26.5% (44 of 166 decks)
- Dream Eater relevance 1.16 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 1.15 · 26.5% (44 of 166 decks)
- Pile On relevance 1.13 · 24.1% (40 of 166 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 1.07 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 1.06 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Curtains' Call relevance 1.05 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 1.04 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.02 · 33.1% (55 of 166 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 1.01 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 36.7% (61 of 166 decks)
- Oakhame Adversary relevance 0.97 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.93 · 38.6% (64 of 166 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.91 · 16.9% (28 of 166 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.89 · 35.5% (59 of 166 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 3.52 · 60.8% (101 of 166 decks)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.73 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 1.54 · 39.2% (65 of 166 decks)
- Keen Duelist relevance 1.35 · 19.9% (33 of 166 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 1.27 · 23.5% (39 of 166 decks)
- Sage of the Beyond relevance 1.25 · 26.5% (44 of 166 decks)
- Savvy Trader relevance 1.24 · 31.9% (53 of 166 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 1.23 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Dream Eater relevance 1.16 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 1.15 · 26.5% (44 of 166 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 36.7% (61 of 166 decks)
- Oakhame Adversary relevance 0.97 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.93 · 38.6% (64 of 166 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.91 · 16.9% (28 of 166 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.89 · 35.5% (59 of 166 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.83 · 53.6% (89 of 166 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 0.81 · 22.9% (38 of 166 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.80 · 41.6% (69 of 166 decks)
- Lilysplash Mentor relevance 0.79 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.79 · 27.1% (45 of 166 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.78 · 39.8% (66 of 166 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.76 · 12.7% (21 of 166 decks)
- Honest Rutstein relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Scroll Rack relevance 1.34 · 24.1% (40 of 166 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 1.23 · 27.1% (45 of 166 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 1.06 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 1.04 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 1.44 · 36.1% (60 of 166 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 1.01 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.86 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.76 · 31.9% (53 of 166 decks)
All instants (11)
- Price of Fame relevance 1.29 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.23 · 42.8% (71 of 166 decks)
- Overwhelming Remorse relevance 1.22 · 22.9% (38 of 166 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 1.18 · 26.5% (44 of 166 decks)
- Pile On relevance 1.13 · 24.1% (40 of 166 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 1.07 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Curtains' Call relevance 1.05 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.86 · 22.3% (37 of 166 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.84 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Baleful Mastery relevance 0.81 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Discovery // Dispersal relevance 0.75 · 11.4% (19 of 166 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Nissa's Expedition relevance 1.24 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 1.02 · 33.1% (55 of 166 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.88 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.79 · 24.1% (40 of 166 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 1.14 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 1.12 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.81 · 22.3% (37 of 166 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.80 · 30.1% (50 of 166 decks)
EDH data for Baneful Omen: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 166 real decks.









































