Wu Light Cavalry
Played in 141 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
28.5% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (8)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 4.06 · 9.2% (91 of 993 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.82 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 1.58 · 33.3% (3 of 9 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 1.29 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Bill Ferny, Bree Swindler relevance 0.84 · 1.2% (4 of 333 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.79 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 0.58 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.57 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wu Scout relevance 6.09 · 90.1% (127 of 141 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.13 · 74.5% (105 of 141 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 2.93 · 43.3% (61 of 141 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.41 · 36.2% (51 of 141 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.40 · 29.1% (41 of 141 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 1.22 · 41.8% (59 of 141 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 1.20 · 20.6% (29 of 141 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 1.20 · 24.8% (35 of 141 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.07 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Diamond Mare relevance 1.01 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Knights of Dol Amroth relevance 1.01 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 1.00 · 36.9% (52 of 141 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.99 · 31.2% (44 of 141 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.97 · 46.1% (65 of 141 decks)
- Akroan Horse relevance 0.88 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Cobbled Lancer relevance 0.86 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 0.86 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.85 · 31.9% (45 of 141 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.85 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 0.84 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Broodbirth Viper relevance 0.83 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Phantasmal Mount relevance 0.82 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Soulknife Spy relevance 0.81 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.80 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.78 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Konda's Banner relevance 0.77 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Cosmos Charger relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Surge Mare relevance 0.73 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Phantom Steed relevance 0.72 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
All creatures (32)
- Wu Scout relevance 6.09 · 90.1% (127 of 141 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.13 · 74.5% (105 of 141 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 2.93 · 43.3% (61 of 141 decks)
- Diamond Mare relevance 1.01 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Knights of Dol Amroth relevance 1.01 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Akroan Horse relevance 0.88 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Cobbled Lancer relevance 0.86 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 0.86 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.85 · 31.9% (45 of 141 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.85 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 0.84 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Broodbirth Viper relevance 0.83 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Phantasmal Mount relevance 0.82 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Soulknife Spy relevance 0.81 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.80 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.78 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Cosmos Charger relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Surge Mare relevance 0.73 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Phantom Steed relevance 0.72 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Syr Elenora, the Discerning relevance 0.67 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 0.67 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.62 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Marchesa's Infiltrator relevance 0.61 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 0.61 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.58 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Neurok Commando relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Schema Thief relevance 0.53 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.52 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.52 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Sturmgeist relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Quietus Spike relevance 1.20 · 24.8% (35 of 141 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.99 · 31.2% (44 of 141 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.97 · 46.1% (65 of 141 decks)
- Konda's Banner relevance 0.77 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.59 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.56 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.56 · 39.0% (55 of 141 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.52 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 1.22 · 41.8% (59 of 141 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 1.00 · 36.9% (52 of 141 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.57 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
All instants (1)
- Force Away relevance 0.63 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.41 · 36.2% (51 of 141 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.40 · 29.1% (41 of 141 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 1.20 · 20.6% (29 of 141 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.07 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.69 · 14.9% (21 of 141 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.60 · 29.1% (41 of 141 decks)
EDH data for Wu Light Cavalry: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 141 real decks.