Wu Light Cavalry
Played in 41 Azorius decks
330+22+6+7+4+7+1+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
8.3% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Lu Xun, Scholar General 73.2% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 73.2% of decks
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 75.6% of decks
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 75.6% of decks
Words of Wind 51.2% of decks
Words of Wind 51.2% of decks
Wishing Well 43.9% of decks
Wishing Well 43.9% of decks
Wizened Mentor 43.9% of decks
Wizened Mentor 43.9% of decks
Wrangler of the Damned 46.3% of decks
Wrangler of the Damned 46.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Ayesha Tanaka relevance 0.88 · 1.6% (2 of 126 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.60 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.58 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.98 · 73.2% (30 of 41 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 4.43 · 75.6% (31 of 41 decks)
- Words of Wind relevance 3.38 · 51.2% (21 of 41 decks)
- Wishing Well relevance 3.01 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wizened Mentor relevance 2.99 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wrangler of the Damned relevance 2.98 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Worship relevance 2.98 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Watertrap Weaver relevance 2.97 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Worldpurge relevance 2.97 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Young Blue Dragon // Sand Augury relevance 2.97 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Wharf Infiltrator relevance 2.96 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Workshop Elders relevance 2.96 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 2.96 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 2.95 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 2.95 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Words of Worship relevance 2.94 · 48.8% (20 of 41 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 2.94 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 2.93 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wispmare relevance 2.91 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 2.90 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Worthy Knight relevance 2.87 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wizard's Spellbook relevance 2.87 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Wizard's Rockets relevance 2.86 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Whispers of the Muse relevance 2.86 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Wreck Remover relevance 2.86 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.86 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Wrench relevance 2.85 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 2.84 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wurmwall Sweeper relevance 2.83 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 2.82 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.98 · 73.2% (30 of 41 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 4.43 · 75.6% (31 of 41 decks)
- Wizened Mentor relevance 2.99 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wrangler of the Damned relevance 2.98 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Watertrap Weaver relevance 2.97 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Young Blue Dragon // Sand Augury relevance 2.97 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Wharf Infiltrator relevance 2.96 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Workshop Elders relevance 2.96 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wispmare relevance 2.91 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 2.90 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Worthy Knight relevance 2.87 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wreck Remover relevance 2.86 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 2.84 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 2.80 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Whispering Wizard relevance 2.76 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Zephyr Singer relevance 2.75 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Warren Warleader relevance 2.72 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Zeriam, Golden Wind relevance 2.69 · 39.0% (16 of 41 decks)
- Windstorm Drake relevance 2.69 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- War Machine, James Rhodes relevance 2.68 · 39.0% (16 of 41 decks)
- Wayspeaker Bodyguard relevance 2.68 · 39.0% (16 of 41 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 2.67 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Wishing Well relevance 3.01 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 2.94 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Wizard's Spellbook relevance 2.87 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Wizard's Rockets relevance 2.86 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Wrench relevance 2.85 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Wurmwall Sweeper relevance 2.83 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Words of Wind relevance 3.38 · 51.2% (21 of 41 decks)
- Worship relevance 2.98 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 2.96 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Words of Worship relevance 2.94 · 48.8% (20 of 41 decks)
- We Ride at Dawn relevance 2.77 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Zur's Weirding relevance 2.74 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Wingspan Stride relevance 2.68 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
All instants (4)
- Whispers of the Muse relevance 2.86 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Whirlwind Technique relevance 2.77 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 2.68 · 48.8% (20 of 41 decks)
- Wings of the Cosmos relevance 2.68 · 39.0% (16 of 41 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Worldpurge relevance 2.97 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 2.95 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 2.95 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.86 · 41.5% (17 of 41 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 2.82 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
- Water Whip relevance 2.79 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Wrath of the Skies relevance 2.67 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Will Kenrith relevance 2.93 · 43.9% (18 of 41 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Winding Canyons relevance 2.85 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 2.68 · 46.3% (19 of 41 decks)
All lands (1)
- White Lotus Hideout relevance 2.68 · 39.0% (16 of 41 decks)
EDH data for Wu Light Cavalry: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 41 real decks.
















































