Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.94 · 61.9% (193 of 312 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.78 · 79.5% (248 of 312 decks)
- Diamond Mare relevance 0.82 · 70.2% (219 of 312 decks)
- Surge Mare relevance 0.85 · 64.7% (202 of 312 decks)
- Courtly Provocateur relevance 0.86 · 59.9% (187 of 312 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 0.85 · 58.7% (183 of 312 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.73 · 68.9% (215 of 312 decks)
- Phantasmal Mount relevance 0.90 · 47.8% (149 of 312 decks)
- Grappling Hook relevance 0.86 · 48.7% (152 of 312 decks)
- Coveted Falcon relevance 0.82 · 53.2% (166 of 312 decks)
- Imagecrafter relevance 0.86 · 46.5% (145 of 312 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.64 · 75.6% (236 of 312 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.81 · 51.0% (159 of 312 decks)
- Chrome Steed relevance 0.89 · 39.4% (123 of 312 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.72 · 59.6% (186 of 312 decks)
- Akroan Horse relevance 0.85 · 42.0% (131 of 312 decks)
- Magnetic Web relevance 0.89 · 34.6% (108 of 312 decks)
- Unnatural Selection relevance 0.85 · 38.1% (119 of 312 decks)
- The Masamune relevance 0.88 · 33.7% (105 of 312 decks)
- Cobbled Lancer relevance 0.82 · 39.4% (123 of 312 decks)
- Birthing Boughs relevance 0.84 · 34.6% (108 of 312 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.69 · 51.3% (160 of 312 decks)
- Cosmos Charger relevance 0.81 · 36.2% (113 of 312 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 0.68 · 51.3% (160 of 312 decks)
- Phantom Steed relevance 0.63 · 56.4% (176 of 312 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.77 · 34.6% (108 of 312 decks)
- Clockwork Steed relevance 0.85 · 24.4% (76 of 312 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 0.68 · 43.9% (137 of 312 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.64 · 47.4% (148 of 312 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.70 · 38.1% (119 of 312 decks)
- Steel Golem relevance 0.79 · 26.6% (83 of 312 decks)
- Changeling Wayfinder relevance 0.66 · 40.7% (127 of 312 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.63 · 43.6% (136 of 312 decks)
- Workhorse relevance 0.79 · 21.2% (66 of 312 decks)
- Grid Monitor relevance 0.79 · 19.9% (62 of 312 decks)
- Rust Elemental relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (69 of 312 decks)
- Bronze Bombshell relevance 0.78 · 19.9% (62 of 312 decks)
- Xenograft relevance 0.75 · 22.4% (70 of 312 decks)
- Mistwalker relevance 0.71 · 26.0% (81 of 312 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.57 · 46.5% (145 of 312 decks)
- Selective Snare relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (54 of 312 decks)
- Runed Stalactite relevance 0.78 · 15.1% (47 of 312 decks)
- Thought Eater relevance 0.75 · 18.6% (58 of 312 decks)
- Three Tree Mascot relevance 0.69 · 26.3% (82 of 312 decks)
- Taniwha relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (45 of 312 decks)
- Thought Nibbler relevance 0.77 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Thought Devourer relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (49 of 312 decks)
- Bronze Horse relevance 0.77 · 11.9% (37 of 312 decks)
- Peer Pressure relevance 0.70 · 15.4% (48 of 312 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (96 of 312 decks)
Card Stacks
17
Card Stacks
17Showing 1-2 of 17
Cards like Arcane Adaptation
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Imagecrafter
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Imagecrafter 46%
- Unnatural Selection 38%
- Standardize 10%
- Mistform Mutant 3%
Cards like Maskwood Nexus
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Maskwood Nexus 76%
- Birthing Boughs 35%
Cards like Bloodline Pretender
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Steel Golem
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Steel Golem 27%
- Grid Monitor 20%
Cards like Thought Eater
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thought Eater 19%
- Thought Devourer 16%
- Thought Nibbler 14%
Cards like Stalactite Dagger
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Reflections of Littjara
7.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Shifting Grift
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Shrewd Negotiation
Cards like Quietus Spike
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Quietus Spike 44%
- Scytheclaw 6%
Cards like Nettlecyst
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nettlecyst 16%
- Adaptive Omnitool 7%
Cards like Unsummon
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Unsummon 20%
- Fading Hope 9%
- Stern Dismissal 3%
- Unsubstantiate 2%
Other options: Force Away, Repulse, Just the Wind, Ice Magic, Arrester's Admonition, Drag Under, Unexplained Disappearance, Voyage's End, Ephara's Dispersal, Galestrike, Consuming Vortex, Drown in Shapelessness, Symbol of Unsummoning, Sweep Away, Select for Inspection
Cards like Aetherize
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Spell Swindle
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Spell Swindle 18%
- Hornswoggle 3%
Cards like Run Away Together
8.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: String of Disappearances, Withdraw, Peel from Reality, Curfew
Cards like Combat Research
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mithril Coat
7.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mithril Coat 15%
- Darksteel Plate 5%
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.78 · 79.5% (248 of 312 decks)
- Diamond Mare relevance 0.82 · 70.2% (219 of 312 decks)
- Surge Mare relevance 0.85 · 64.7% (202 of 312 decks)
- Courtly Provocateur relevance 0.86 · 59.9% (187 of 312 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.73 · 68.9% (215 of 312 decks)
- Phantasmal Mount relevance 0.90 · 47.8% (149 of 312 decks)
- Coveted Falcon relevance 0.82 · 53.2% (166 of 312 decks)
- Imagecrafter relevance 0.86 · 46.5% (145 of 312 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.81 · 51.0% (159 of 312 decks)
- Chrome Steed relevance 0.89 · 39.4% (123 of 312 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.72 · 59.6% (186 of 312 decks)
- Akroan Horse relevance 0.85 · 42.0% (131 of 312 decks)
- Cobbled Lancer relevance 0.82 · 39.4% (123 of 312 decks)
- Cosmos Charger relevance 0.81 · 36.2% (113 of 312 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 0.68 · 51.3% (160 of 312 decks)
- Phantom Steed relevance 0.63 · 56.4% (176 of 312 decks)
- Clockwork Steed relevance 0.85 · 24.4% (76 of 312 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 0.68 · 43.9% (137 of 312 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.70 · 38.1% (119 of 312 decks)
- Steel Golem relevance 0.79 · 26.6% (83 of 312 decks)
- Changeling Wayfinder relevance 0.66 · 40.7% (127 of 312 decks)
- Workhorse relevance 0.79 · 21.2% (66 of 312 decks)
- Grid Monitor relevance 0.79 · 19.9% (62 of 312 decks)
- Rust Elemental relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (69 of 312 decks)
- Bronze Bombshell relevance 0.78 · 19.9% (62 of 312 decks)
- Mistwalker relevance 0.71 · 26.0% (81 of 312 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.57 · 46.5% (145 of 312 decks)
- Thought Eater relevance 0.75 · 18.6% (58 of 312 decks)
- Three Tree Mascot relevance 0.69 · 26.3% (82 of 312 decks)
- Taniwha relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (45 of 312 decks)
- Thought Nibbler relevance 0.77 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Thought Devourer relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (49 of 312 decks)
- Bronze Horse relevance 0.77 · 11.9% (37 of 312 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (96 of 312 decks)
- Tolarian Entrancer relevance 0.67 · 9.9% (31 of 312 decks)
- Turtleshell Changeling relevance 0.67 · 9.3% (29 of 312 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.34 · 64.7% (202 of 312 decks)
- Sage of Lat-Nam relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (46 of 312 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.51 · 24.0% (75 of 312 decks)
- Omni-Changeling relevance 0.48 · 29.8% (93 of 312 decks)
- Barkform Harvester relevance 0.55 · 15.4% (48 of 312 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.51 · 21.8% (68 of 312 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.45 · 31.7% (99 of 312 decks)
- Mistform Warchief relevance 0.57 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Littjara Kinseekers relevance 0.61 · 9.3% (29 of 312 decks)
- Saprazzan Heir relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (30 of 312 decks)
- Razorgrass Screen relevance 0.65 · 4.8% (15 of 312 decks)
- Troop of Ponies relevance 0.51 · 15.1% (47 of 312 decks)
- Rooftop Percher relevance 0.59 · 7.4% (23 of 312 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.45 · 20.2% (63 of 312 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.94 · 61.9% (193 of 312 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 0.85 · 58.7% (183 of 312 decks)
- Grappling Hook relevance 0.86 · 48.7% (152 of 312 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.64 · 75.6% (236 of 312 decks)
- Magnetic Web relevance 0.89 · 34.6% (108 of 312 decks)
- The Masamune relevance 0.88 · 33.7% (105 of 312 decks)
- Birthing Boughs relevance 0.84 · 34.6% (108 of 312 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.77 · 34.6% (108 of 312 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.63 · 43.6% (136 of 312 decks)
- Runed Stalactite relevance 0.78 · 15.1% (47 of 312 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.55 · 20.5% (64 of 312 decks)
- Ace's Baseball Bat relevance 0.62 · 8.0% (25 of 312 decks)
- Magitek Scythe relevance 0.61 · 4.8% (15 of 312 decks)
- Amorphous Axe relevance 0.56 · 5.1% (16 of 312 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.48 · 10.6% (33 of 312 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.50 · 6.4% (20 of 312 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.39 · 18.9% (59 of 312 decks)
- Rogue's Gloves relevance 0.49 · 6.1% (19 of 312 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.38 · 16.0% (50 of 312 decks)
- Scytheclaw relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (18 of 312 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.37 · 15.1% (47 of 312 decks)
- Prying Blade relevance 0.45 · 5.8% (18 of 312 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.35 · 17.0% (53 of 312 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.39 · 10.6% (33 of 312 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.34 · 17.6% (55 of 312 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 0.44 · 4.8% (15 of 312 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.42 · 6.7% (21 of 312 decks)
- Mirrormind Crown relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (19 of 312 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.39 · 9.3% (29 of 312 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (24 of 312 decks)
- Trading Post relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (19 of 312 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (22 of 312 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.36 · 5.4% (17 of 312 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (16 of 312 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (16 of 312 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (22 of 312 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.34 · 5.4% (17 of 312 decks)
- Bloodforged Battle-Axe relevance 0.37 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.33 · 5.4% (17 of 312 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 40.7% (127 of 312 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Psychic Paper relevance 0.39 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
Enchantments
31
Enchantments
31 Showing 1-10 of 31
Page size
All enchantments (31)
- Unnatural Selection relevance 0.85 · 38.1% (119 of 312 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.69 · 51.3% (160 of 312 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.64 · 47.4% (148 of 312 decks)
- Xenograft relevance 0.75 · 22.4% (70 of 312 decks)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.55 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.45 · 30.4% (95 of 312 decks)
- Endless Evil relevance 0.51 · 17.6% (55 of 312 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.35 · 41.3% (129 of 312 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.43 · 19.9% (62 of 312 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (55 of 312 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.38 · 16.0% (50 of 312 decks)
- Cunning Evasion relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.27 · 13.1% (41 of 312 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Chamber of Manipulation relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Puca's Mischief relevance 0.40 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.15 · 29.8% (93 of 312 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (20 of 312 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.12 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 9.0% (28 of 312 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Standardize relevance 0.67 · 9.9% (31 of 312 decks)
- Get Out relevance 0.52 · 27.6% (86 of 312 decks)
- Trickery Charm relevance 0.63 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.40 · 42.3% (132 of 312 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 0.51 · 16.7% (52 of 312 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (40 of 312 decks)
- Sudden Substitution relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (44 of 312 decks)
- Wings of Velis Vel relevance 0.54 · 6.7% (21 of 312 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (55 of 312 decks)
- Artificial Evolution relevance 0.51 · 8.0% (25 of 312 decks)
- Mystic Reflection relevance 0.40 · 12.2% (38 of 312 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.36 · 19.6% (61 of 312 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (39 of 312 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.38 · 9.0% (28 of 312 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (24 of 312 decks)
- Become Anonymous relevance 0.41 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.29 · 9.9% (31 of 312 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.26 · 13.1% (41 of 312 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (16 of 312 decks)
- Hornswoggle relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (10 of 312 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.23 · 17.0% (53 of 312 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.20 · 29.2% (91 of 312 decks)
- Depths of Desire relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (8 of 312 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (10 of 312 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.15 · 37.5% (117 of 312 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.21 · 11.2% (35 of 312 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (18 of 312 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (18 of 312 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.21 · 6.1% (19 of 312 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.18 · 10.6% (33 of 312 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (23 of 312 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.13 · 39.7% (124 of 312 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.16 · 16.3% (51 of 312 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (17 of 312 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.13 · 30.4% (95 of 312 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.13 · 20.8% (65 of 312 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (8 of 312 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.12 · 21.8% (68 of 312 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.16 · 6.4% (20 of 312 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.14 · 10.6% (33 of 312 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.11 · 23.4% (73 of 312 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 15.7% (49 of 312 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
Sorceries
46
Sorceries
46 Showing 1-10 of 46
Page size
All sorceries (46)
- Selective Snare relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (54 of 312 decks)
- Peer Pressure relevance 0.70 · 15.4% (48 of 312 decks)
- Modify Memory relevance 0.56 · 20.2% (63 of 312 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.55 · 19.2% (60 of 312 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.45 · 30.4% (95 of 312 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.44 · 13.1% (41 of 312 decks)
- Anchor to Reality relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (24 of 312 decks)
- Donate relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Switcheroo relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.36 · 7.4% (23 of 312 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.28 · 21.5% (67 of 312 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.30 · 12.8% (40 of 312 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.30 · 11.5% (36 of 312 decks)
- Legerdemain relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (10 of 312 decks)
- Voidwalk relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (17 of 312 decks)
- Knowledge Exploitation relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.26 · 11.9% (37 of 312 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.26 · 10.3% (32 of 312 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.20 · 28.2% (88 of 312 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (17 of 312 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (10 of 312 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (20 of 312 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 0.33 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (15 of 312 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.16 · 11.9% (37 of 312 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (10 of 312 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (10 of 312 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (15 of 312 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (48 of 312 decks)
- Secret of Bloodbending relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (8 of 312 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.14 · 10.6% (33 of 312 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (13 of 312 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (10 of 312 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (8 of 312 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (8 of 312 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
Planeswalkers
1
Planeswalkers
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (29 of 312 decks)
Utility Lands
47
Utility Lands
47 Showing 1-10 of 47
Page size
All utility lands (47)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.68 · 63.8% (199 of 312 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.67 · 15.7% (49 of 312 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (72 of 312 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.48 · 5.1% (16 of 312 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.29 · 38.8% (121 of 312 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.45 · 5.8% (18 of 312 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (23 of 312 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (22 of 312 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.27 · 17.3% (54 of 312 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.28 · 14.1% (44 of 312 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.28 · 11.2% (35 of 312 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 24.7% (77 of 312 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.24 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (22 of 312 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.21 · 19.6% (61 of 312 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.21 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Soulstone Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (8 of 312 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (16 of 312 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.25 · 5.8% (18 of 312 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 22.1% (69 of 312 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.21 · 12.8% (40 of 312 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.19 · 11.9% (37 of 312 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.18 · 11.2% (35 of 312 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (43 of 312 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (15 of 312 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (24 of 312 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.17 · 9.0% (28 of 312 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.17 · 9.9% (31 of 312 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 15.1% (47 of 312 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.15 · 14.1% (44 of 312 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (11 of 312 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (17 of 312 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 38.5% (120 of 312 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (9 of 312 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 34.6% (108 of 312 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (8 of 312 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (8 of 312 decks)
Lands
12
Lands
12 Showing 1-10 of 12
Page size
All lands (12)
- Treasure Map // Treasure Cove relevance 0.54 · 13.1% (41 of 312 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (14 of 312 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.37 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (26 of 312 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (16 of 312 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.18 · 19.6% (61 of 312 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.17 · 8.7% (27 of 312 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (20 of 312 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (12 of 312 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (7 of 312 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 85.6% (267 of 312 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Bill Ferny, Bree Swindler, from 312 real Commander decks.